Yeah, from truthers? Bwahahahaha. You can believe whatever you want but I thought you said you were educated.
See, I think half the truther's have an agenda as well. I am a firm believer in people putting false conclusions out to undermine the legit questions. The fact that you are always attacking, is what makes me believe you have an agenda. Stay on offense, rule #1 right?
So give us some facts then, what is the percent of load the outside walls bore, the inner core? How were the floors attached to the columns and how would that affect the reserve strength of the remaining columns? What was the force hitting the towers by a Boeing 767-200ER loaded with fuel and passengers, how would the damage to the core affect load on the core?
Kinetic energy is one half the mass times the velocity squared. Thus the difference in energy between the nose cone and the landing gear is very little because their velocities were the same and velocity affects the energy much more than mass does. I don't see you destroying anyone anytime soon.
I have never spent the time needed to really evaluate this info, I also don't think my work would not be too happy if i start using Matlab and CAD programs to really look at this properly. I have questions about 9-11. I am impartial on the idea of a false flag operation, or doctored evidence. My questions about 9-11 can be sourced to Sibel Edmonds.
You work 24/7? Why are you diddling on the internet now then? Don't worry, much smarter people have already done it at MIT. Look it up.
I think it's funny when people, trying to name drop evidence of their expertise, make it obvious that they don't know what they are talking about.
You didn't explain at all how a flat piece of aluminum that is about 3/8ths of an inch thick, doesn't disintegrate under those forces. Round piece of aluminum, bullet shaped piece of aluminum? Sure, no problem. A cone shaped piece of aluminum with no aerodynamic qualities once separated from the fuselage? ****!
How would that be? I wouldn't use CAD and Matlab to determine material strengths for a given structure?
You do realize, don't you, that the outer walls were a lattice structure. Care to tell us what concertina shearing of sheet metal is?
See now despite the attempt to undermine through labeling, this is a legit question, and why I asked for a source.
What sheet metal son? It is made of aluminum! I would give you the dog gone specs right now if I wouldn't lose my job for it!
yeah, and now you are showing your arse. So when the skin of an AP is created, they take sheet metal to form the skin huh? LMAO!!! Yeah, that is how suppliers produce things. they are using hammers, metal, and heat huh? Welcome to the 19th century!
Man, you don't know much about aircraft. What do you think the stringers are made of? What do you think forms the skin of an Boeing 767-200ER? Oh, and you are using AP incorrectly. An AP mechanic is an A & P mechanic which means Airframe and Power plant.
Naw, kid. You find me anyone in the industry that uses AP, to describe an A & P mechanic, and I'll give you a cookie, or a Tulley's card.(yeah, more references you aren't going to get, because I am the subject matter expert here) Just so you get it, you could have a AP electrician, an AP part, a AP sealer. Have you figured out what AP stands for yet? As for your other question, IDK, I work on the 747-8. Want to ask me questions about it, that I can actually answer without losing my job?
Its media fraud, the invincible beer can. this was on of the premier scenes rerun thousands of times to promote stealing ME lands. its hilarious, troughers dont like it though
