Is Neo[Atheism] a Rational Religion?

"Blue" is not a proposition. "Yellow" is not a proposition. And, by the way, green is a composite of yellow and blue WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT MATERIAL . . . PIGMENTS. If we are just talking about light instead of pigments, then no, green is not a composite of yellow and blue. It's a primary color if we are talking about light.

Regardless, PLONK, you still don't understand how propositions work. Try again. This time try present an actual, logically-constructed argument. Your yellow/blue/green "argument" is not an argument. It has no propositions.

 

Yes, it is. As has already been demonstrated. Read.

 

Atheism is not a belief system. It is a position on one issue. There are many atheist belief systems. Everyone but you understands this.

 

actually Klima, a highly regarded philosopher said its merely semantic so we compar that to your citations.

Oh wait you didnt post any citations, just a BS narrative.

I choose klima! He understands philosophy and logic, most importantly grammar and the english language you do not.

 

I dont see a quote, it didnt happen outside your imagination. we all know your drill.

So hows that "I dont know" workin for ya? LMAO

 

We have to deal with only one of your contradictions at a time, so we'll have to leave your contradiction about "I don't know" on a shelf for now. But keep making fun of yourself if you want. Meanwhile, you have claimed that you do not believe in God, you have claimed that you do not disbelieve in God, and you have claimed that not believing in God and disbelieving in God are the same thing. This is a contradiction -- yet another one you've added to your constantly growing collection.

 

LMAO
"Green = yellow and blue". I said absolutely nothing about "pigment"
You had to change my argument because as I said it cannot be further reduced.
I know how difficult this is for you, so please try to refrain from changing my proposition to your strawman.

 

Before you think alleging I have contradictions you first have to deal with the bullshit you posted:
So hows that "I dont know" workin for ya? LMAO

All you have proven is that you run away from your own claims.

 

Then you have no idea what the **** you are talking about, because "green = yellow and blue" is only true if we are talking about pigment. It doesn't work, for example, if we are talking about light instead of pigment.

You presented no argument. You didn't even have any propositions/statements.

You offered no proposition. Yellow is not a proposition. Blue is not a proposition. Green is not a proposition.

 

I'll only cover one of your contradictions at a time. I know you are impatient to get to more of your contradictions, but one at a time.

 

not real good at this are you, that is false on its face and you know it.

 

there you go folks he is still DODGING RUNNING away as fast and anyway he can.

Before you think alleging I have contradictions you first have to deal with the bullshit you posted:
So hows that "I dont know" workin for ya? LMAO

All you have proven is that you run away from your own claims.

 

No, it isn't. Looks like you are failing at color theory as hard as you've failed at logic, physics, history, etc.

 

You have yet to address any question about any of your claims, address any challenge to any of your claims, etc. When you find yourself failing at one argument, you try to shift to another. So, which of your contradictions would you like to talk about? I'll let you pick the topic.

 

looks like you have no clue about color theory, as proven by your lack of a citation.

 

You've provided no citation. According to your "logic," you have proven you have no clue about color theory. You contradict yourself once again. But, since you are begging to be proven wrong, I'll be kind and oblige you. Here you are.

 

Says the poster who just strawmanned my proposition. The hypocrisy know no limits!

there you go folks he is still DODGING RUNNING away as fast and anyway he can.

Before you think alleging I have contradictions you first have to deal with the bullshit you posted:
So hows that "I dont know" workin for ya? LMAO

All you have proven is that you run away from your own claims.

 

You offered no propositions. None. "Blue" is not a proposition. "Yellow" is not a proposition. "Green" is not a proposition.

 

Huh? you have not even made a case, nothing was proven, nice fake out, FAIL

 

I made it perfectly clear, more figments of your imagination. Never ceases to amaze me the stupid **** you can invent

 

Unlike you, I've provided a citation. One that you asked for, but now run and hide from.

 

You made it perfectly clear that you think "Blue" and "Yellow" or propositions. They are not.

 

your 'narrative' is not a citation, wow attempting degenerate the debate into bald faced lies, ****ing seriously?
Please dont insult the intelligence of the readers

 

I provided a link. I provided a citation. You've provided none. Do I need to teach you how links work?

 

what post?