Is Sanders more "dangerous" than Trump?

I agree on the silver spoon, but Trump has faced difficult situation in his life such as bankruptcies, winning or losing contracts, having and not having money. Clearly it is not political experience, and I don't think he is qualified for the Presidency. He would certainly benefit from this campaign however with such big publicity, Sanders on the other hand is a bully, strongly motivated in old style politic (he would be a perfect leader of a Syndicate), with zero foreign experience. I don't like Trump in politics, but I would trust him more than Sanders in difficult situations. Trump would avoid a dangerous controntation, looking for advice; Sanders would go ahead like a crazy bull. I prefer to be led by a cool leader, not a bull.

 

Of the three, the wisest in politics, is definitively Hillary. 8 years with Clinton and his advisers, 8 years with Obama and co-advisers. She is also much appreciated in Europe and elsewhere. Choosing Trump (a newcomer) or Bernie (an impulsive crasher) seems a really bad choice to me.

 

To be clear, those "difficulties" you speak of are solely due to his incompetence as a business person. Ironically, the same trait he likes to sell to people to garner their vote.

 

If Hillary is a warmonger, then I am James Bond. What absurd statement! There has been only one American military intervention, in Lybia, in the Obama years. I am afraid that if there would be a Sanders, an excitable and strongly reactive man, we would not be so lucky..

 

She is. Name the military intervention she was initially against. Name one.

Obama has attacked 8 different countries, so far.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...izza-says-obama-has-bombed-more-nations-bush/

 

I don't see these WARS, apart of Lybia started by the stupid French. The other were interventions against the ISIS or the continuation of other actions. So, unless you believe that we should let ISIS invade Siria, Turkey and Lybia, I donn't see these interventions and I don't see Hillary as the extreme warmonger.

 

Sanders character is good, its his politics that I differ. But I consider Sanders a fairly honest politician which is something one can not say about Hillary or Trump. If this election was based on character of the individual, it would be Sanders hands down.

 

You said he only attacked one country. He has bombed 8. Those are hard facts of history, not silly putty for you to mold into the shapes you like and then eat.

 

So, your claim is that a Republican-controlled House will acquiesce to Sander's demands? Or are you claiming the Democrats will gain control of the House?

 

No, I am only stating that Sanders is a populist who claims to do changes he will never be able to do. Changes are achieved step by step and not in the way sanders is proposing to do. Honestly when I listen to him and his brutal way of pretending things, he reminds me of Castro and other communist leaders of the past. . America reached greatness because it managed to keep out such ideology. Do we really need a populist as a President?

 

I'm a conservative, and I would vote for Bern before someone like Jeb Bush or Rubio. The Gazi's (global socialist) own just about everyone but Bernie and Trump. I feel in the force that Bernie is an all around good human being. We disagree politicaly, but that's ok. Atleast he's not a sell out.

 

He is dangerous because of his ideologies. He belongs to the one of the most dangerous political sect of leftwing ideology. It's frightening really.

 

Bernie's heart is in the right place.....but in order to fix a system you have to work within that system.

He is actually right about most of the things he talks about.

But he has absolutely no way of safely implementing those ideas.

AA

 

Great Satan, I travel a lot, everywhere. I compare Sanders to others i have seen in other countries, and would stay away as far as possible from him. To judge a person you have to look at how he behaves with others. He behaves with the Democratic party and with Hillary with abbrutality unseen in other political persons. This brutality may please people that hates Hillary, but cannot be considered acceptable : he is disloyal, bossy, self centered. A very dangerous person if he would lead a nation. A President has to listen to other most of the time. Sanders listen only to myself. If he gets angry if one north-korean or Iranian or russian doessomething wrong,would he be able to control himself? If we are afraid of Trump' actions, we should be even more cautious with Sanders temper. I hope Hillary gets this nomination quickly, and actually win the election. Enough of angry or arrogant men.Maybe what we need is a woman leader with a cool head.

 

That's why President's have advisers; Reagan who knew virtually nothing about foreign policy had advisers on staff including a palm reader for added security. If Sanders was provoked by a foreign country, you bet he'd contact his advisers to see what should, if anything be done.

I don't believe Sanders is an "angry old man", in fact I think he's more level headed then both Hillary and Trump.

 

like who and where?

I thought you libs just look at what race/sex/religion someone is and assign stereotypes to that person that the central nexus deems for that class. It's why people like you see a white male christian and are free to project your hatred upon them.

I think you're just mad because the collective bought and paid for Hillary and now this dude comes along and threatens to derail corruption as usual. I see a good person when I see Bernie. I'm 100% different then him politically too and it doesn't bother me one bit that he has white skin and male genitalia.

If you're heavely invest in crooked government contracts, selling American interest for personal gain, or a global bank, I'd be scared too.

The president don't got to listen. Like The Obama, he has a pen and a phone.

you mean himself? How do you know? He seems pretty cool to me.

Are you worried we won't smuggle ISIS weapons and prop up/arm Iran? Last I checked, the Gazi's (global socialist) who like there predecessors, the Nazi's, really have it out for Russia. Russia is not our enemy, but the Gazi's are trying to pick a fight between us. An outsider who isn't bought and paid for by the collective is what this country, and the world need right now.

Gross... Why would you want a total corrupt POS like Hillary to take control? A vote for Hillary is a vote for global rule through global banks/corporations. You want some CEO in Holland telling Hillary how to run your life?

your sexist remarks really shows how "deep" of a thinker you really are. You should get out more.

 

So? Every presidential candidate makes those claims. See some of Ron Paul's outrageous claims.

Perhaps you do need a populist. I'll take Trump or Sanders. Sometimes it's necessary to adopt a hard-line in order to create room to negotiate.