Is the Regime hiding Benghazi survivors under new names to avoid Congress?

Watergate would have been a 'witch hunt that had fallen flat' as well if the President had been a democrat. Folk understand the beloved 'democrat exception from the law' clause the left so relies on...

 

It was Obama's people that had the CIA stand down instead of rescuing those being attacked in Benghazi so your damn right it's his fault. On 9/11 there was no time to put up a defense. Bush did close the air and put fighters up to combat any further terroristic activity. Obama pretended it wasn't happening. Obama pretended it was over a video.

 

So are the Benghazi survivors in the same secret FEMA camp where Barbara Olson and the 9/11 passengers are being held...or the one where the still-livnig 96 year old Jack Kennedy is kept.....or a different secret FEMA camp?

 

Watergate was real, it was proven that Nixon lied and covered up for his men. Your party hasn't been able to prove anything in Benghazi other than that they like to waste taxpayer's money chasing rabbits.

 

>>>MOD EDIT: INSULT<<<. Provide a link with a credible source other than some conservative on Faux News spewing more lies or just admit that you got nothing.

>>>MOD EDIT: INSULT<<< Obama said the very next morning that it was an act of terror. Blame Petraeus, the Republican who was director of CIA and signed Rice's talking points. Incredible that you are still spewing that pap after it has all be debunked!

Why have there been no charges? Because it's all a pipe dream from the Republican party, gone sour!

 

Your statement implies that you expect me to use only liberal sources. Well (*)(*)(*)(*) you! There is not a damn thing wrong with Fox news. If you don't accept them as a news source than you are the problem.

 

I guess other than Faux News everything else is "liberal"?

Well show me what you got from Faux News? Surely Faux News has proof from the Military that Obama ordered a stand down? Name names.

Other than that it lies and makes up (*)(*)(*)(*), I guess there is not a damn thing wrong with Faux News! Bwahahaha

Oh, I'll accept something from Faux News that is supported with actual proof, not just because they say so, like you.

 

Oh for God's sake! The exception to the law is not Obama dependent. It applies to all senior dems. We also 'proved' Clinton broke a host of laws and no one on the left cared. Obama's regime has done about everything possible to hide the truth in the Benghazi debacle, Fast and Furious, the IRS scandal and the universal NSA snooping violations of the law. You know it, I know it but we also know that none of these will make the dems look at their guy regardless of what he and his do...They are protected by the Democrat Exception and no amount of sleaze and illegality will trump that.

 

You moved the goal post. I did not say Obama ordered a stand down. I said Obama's people did.

[video]http://video.foxnews.com/v/2374545573001/who-gave-stand-down-order-in-benghazi/[/video]
Someone gave the order and the only ones who legally could give the order is in Obama's chain of command, thus his people.

 

DANGER! DANGER! The notorious Logic Error, the Genesis Fallacy appears again in which the truth of something depends on its source...In the NY Times..of Biblical truth. On FOX, a dam*ed lie!

Silliness pretending to be an argument.

 

But there is no evidence whatsoever to back up these claims. This is complete BS that people simply make up, and call fact without actually backing up what they say.

 

There is vast evidence, the left simply refuses to view it and pretends it does not exist. I am reminded of the Clinton impeachment. Throughout the entire trial in the Senate the senators of the left declared "There is not hint of evidence of the fellows wrongdoing" yet not a single democrat senator visited the evidence room where the evidence was found...

 

Some guy saying it's true without actually giving any proof is not evidence. Post sources for this evidence or shut the (*)(*)(*)(*) up.

 

Awesome, so can we conclude that CNN is no longer part of the gigantic liberal media conspiracy?

 

http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/08/politics/benghazi-hearing/index.html

I would also recommend you read the transcript of the Congressional hearings,,,

The 'evidence' has been noted in perhaps hundreds of posts on this forum and still the Regimes apparatchik's squeal...'No evidence'...as they will until the issue is resolved. It is what they do. The Democrat exception from both the law and morality applies.

I am amused with your pretense that some silly fellow on an internet site gets to tell other folk to remain silent....Good luck with that.

 

YAWN.....

Get back to me when you have something of substance on Benghazi, not bloated up minutia.

 

Who exactly in Obama's administration did? I can't open your video, no surprise since it's from Faux News!

But, for your information, that has already been debunked. I guess you weren't paying attention when Faux News amended their claim, or maybe they never amended it? I told you, you shouldn't put your faith in Faux News, they make you believe crazy stuff that isn't true.


More than a month after the attacks in Benghazi killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, Fox began airing accusations that security forces present in Libya at the time were ordered to "stand down" by the Obama administration.

A search of the Nexis database shows that the accusation that these security forces were ordered to "stand down" was made in 85 segments on the network's primetime shows by Fox hosts, contributors, guests, and in video accompanying news reports and commentary.

But now even Republicans are admitting that a "stand down" order was never given. According to The Associated Press, Gibson told a Republican-led congressional committee on June 26 that he was never ordered to "stand down."
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/06/27/no-benghazi-stand-down-order-was-given-another/194644

 

Ah, the pretend indifference. I am reminded of another fellow too deluded to know what was happening...

- Chamberlain...

Go back to sleep. All is well. Ask BoBo...

 

Aha, just as I suspected, nothing there, just more gibberish.

 

What is 'gibberish' to the left is called an education to the right.

 

But the right doesn't favor education....remember, they tried to compare Palin's lack of education to Obama's "elite" education and thought she was just as qualified!

 

A quota education followed by ineptness as a politician pretty much confirms the rights view on the issue...

 

goggle it. All sources point to some gal by the name of Valerie Jarrett.
http://conservativereport.org/benghazi-valerie-jarrett-cic/

 

Experience is more important than education and Palin had executive experience while Obama didn't.

 

Yea. I think Palin would have done a better job than Obama.
And the libs are just running from the Benghazi thing, I think. I think there is something there. Did anyone address the changing of people's names, I wonder? (I didn't want to read whole thread).