Isn't Looking Good For Romney

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by CSWorden3, Jun 30, 2012.

  1. dadoalex

    dadoalex Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    10,894
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The president's job is not to get you a job. That's your job. And sitting on a computer whining on an anonymous message board won't help.

    If you were unemployed this president made sure you're unemployment compensation was extended. Romney would not.
    If you have a family this president made sure you had money to pay for food. Romney would not.
    If you have kids and no insurance this president made sure they were covered. Romney would not.

    Maybe this president hasn't done for you what you should be doing for yourself be he has done what you could not do for yourself.

    Romney would not.
     
  2. dadoalex

    dadoalex Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    10,894
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, please pick KindaSleezy.

    One of the architects of Bush' war in Iraq and his debacle in Afghanistan. Just as a reminder of the mess Bush left behind and the progress Obama has made in cleaning it up.
     
  3. PatrickT

    PatrickT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    16,593
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Of course, Gov. Romney has an uphill battle. President Obama has the money, he spend taxpayer money for re-election, he has the criminals in the unions and in the DOJ, he's suing to keep Democrat election fraud a significant factor, and he has a flock of disciples who are as delusional as Tom Cruise. And, Gov. Romney doesn't exactly energize the conservatives. Fortunately, Rachel Maddows "Boy King" does energize conservatives. The Boy King's Obamacare energizes conservatives. The King's support for Moslem extremists energizes conservatives. And, President Obama's racism energizes most Amercians.
     
  4. nuclearoption

    nuclearoption New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It will come down to a few states...michigan, pennsylvania, ohio, florida, virginia a few others. Polls dont really mean much to me right now. I'm tiring of the electoral college sytem of voting, but thats what we have.
     
  5. dadoalex

    dadoalex Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    10,894
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Despite the efforts of Republicans, an effort every Republican should be ashamed of, Blacks will turn out and vote.

    Yeah? Tell that to Colorado, Arizona, and Nevada.

    Yeah. True. But a lot of union members, past and present, have realized what voting Republican really means. Romney won't get their votes.

    Isn't that the same mistake Hillary made in 08? Obama's organization is deep and wide and those kids know that Romney is not their answer.

    Can you say "Ryan Budget?" Which destroys medicare?
    Can you say "privatize?"

    Willard has managed to clip away a significant portion of the Republican base.

    Me. Very proud. And very Republican.


    The choice comes down to whether the American people can trust a guy who won't talk about his business experience, won't talk about his government experience, has flipped on virtually every issue and cannot even handle a softball interview on FAUX.

    Barring the economic disaster each and every "conservative" dreams of Romney is toast.
     
  6. flounder

    flounder In Memoriam Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    27,364
    Likes Received:
    653
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I heard on MSNBC yesterday Romni has not spent nearly what he could in the battle ground states yet, he's waiting. I was surprised to hear that, but that's what they said,,,I have not checked to see if they are correct, but why wouldn't they be?
     
  7. flounder

    flounder In Memoriam Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    27,364
    Likes Received:
    653
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I hope you are correct, Real clear politics has Obama care 38.1 for, and 48.9 against,,that's almost half the country against this thing,,I hope the election is on that. I just do not know if the people are smart enough to realize just how important it is, they did give the Repubs Congress, so maybe they are still against it as much.
     
  8. tkolter

    tkolter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,134
    Likes Received:
    598
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If the Republicans were serious about replacing Obamacare they need to put out an alternative that will help cover the poor uninsured and I don't see anything which is why ,once the exactly costs come out for those affected by the law, under 400% of the Federal Poverty line Obama will gain votes. I explained the law to a couple with a child earning around $22,000 a year and they get it the insurance is cheap and the care out of pocket costs for them cheap so will vote for Obama. Poor people are not dumb, working class low income not dumb and the lower middle class not dumb we can do simple math and if its presented as low cost insurance with a big chunk of the out of pocket costs the usual black hole for insurance and low income people they will vote for Obama in large numbers to matter.

    How this is paid for, more taxes, nuances in the law for race etc. mentioned do not matter.

    And its five months to go if the economy gets better and the health care is explained to the group most in benefit this can chance Obama just needs enough votes for re-election not a huge majority. The Democrats need to also do this to look at gaining seats in Congress.

    This fight is not over and its not looking good for Romney.
     
  9. flounder

    flounder In Memoriam Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    27,364
    Likes Received:
    653
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I disagree, the public never figures that much, all they have to hear is TAX'S,,,that's why they got killed last time,,what plan did they have then? nada!

    Romney will draw in much more money than Obama,,what did Obama raise against McCain,,,three to one?,,,more? Remember Mccain was still winning before the crash,,,remember? The crash now is in Obam's court,,it will favor Romney. So,,,all things being equal Romney should take it. Obama will get much less votes, not more, and his cash and turnout will be less. Also the economy is around his neck, not his opponents...and the majority hates Obama care.


    If that was the case last time, McCain would have won, there is no denying that, he was already ahead.
     
  10. E_Pluribus_Venom

    E_Pluribus_Venom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    15,691
    Likes Received:
    151
    Trophy Points:
    63
    ugh stop listening to "the news".
     
  11. flounder

    flounder In Memoriam Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    27,364
    Likes Received:
    653
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL,,,,I know, but to be fair I listen to both MSNBC and Fox. They said he's holding off till after Labor day. They think he is making a mistake. I dont, I do not think the average voter is into this yet.
     
  12. signcutter

    signcutter New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,716
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So this election..in the eyes of a lot of people.. will be decided by who has the biggest warchest with which to spread spin and half-truths.
     

Share This Page