It’s Official: Britain’s Muslim Population Doubled

The 'news' outlet in question is, well, questionable at the very best.

Here's another one.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/d...hers-what-does-this-mean-for-liberal-britain/

Maybe the OP has a point.

hang on a mo....

Looks like some old story that has been dragged up for some reason or another, probably some extremist Jewish or anti Islam group out to score points.
or is it?

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3500/islam-growing-religion-britain

Prisoners converting for better food...sounds a bit bad. Better look at who claims this so we have an idea of who we're dealing with.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/about/

A couple of Muslim sounding names on there. Maybe they're honest.

James Woolsey, Jr.

Most ex CIA are known for being lefty fluffy bunnies - not.

Amir Taheri

A known liar, claiming Iran had passed laws that were never even considered.

M. Zuhdi Jasser, MD

Seems he's in it for the cash he makes from crappy films about Islamic terrorism.

Douglas Murray

Looks like he thinks Islam is about to stone him to death for being gay. Just a sad loser with a chip on his shoulder.

Naomi Perlman - nothing, not a sausage, she doesn't exist. How odd.
Oh, hang on again....
http://www.njjewishnews.com/njjn.com/020509/pmbPrincetonShulChosen.html

Not a lot to go on there except the dodgy company.

What a dedicated, unbiased bunch we have.

 

Brilliant work.

Happy Christmas.

 

And belated Happy Hanukkah, for sure

 

I'm not really into Christmas but thanks for the thought and a happy Christmas to you.

 

I just like it because I know Santa passes them by..




[video=youtube;EP1gNYU27Tk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP1gNYU27Tk[/video]

 

No matter how the facts are stacked, the mindset of islamism is not compatible with harmony and humanitarianism. For any free thinking country to take in large numbers of muslims, is to invite future weakness, and instability of it`s society, by virtue of perpetual division.

 

I disagree.

 

With what?

 

The number of foreign-born residents in England and Wales has risen by nearly three million since 2001 to 7.5 million people, according to the 2011 census. The most common birthplaces outside the UK for residents are India, Poland and Pakistan and the Irish Republic. The number of Polish-born people living in England and Wales has risen by almost 900% since the last census and they now make up 1% of the population - more than Irish-born residents and most of the Polish migrants tend to be younger, and more prepared to move for work. Slough, in Berkshire, has the highest proportion of foreign-born residents in the South East - with well-established Asian communities and a large proportion of more recent migrants from Eastern Europe. In Leicester, much of the Asian population is second or third generation - descendants of migrants who came to the city from East Africa in the 1970s.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20713380

 

Always knew you were a closet Islamist.

 

Everything you say.

 

Another book commits suicide....

 

Exactly why none take your posts seriously. No one like trolls.

 

Please tell us Jack how Islamism and Humanism go hand in hand....

 

They bother you, because you are really here to just spread hate against Americans, Europeans, and Muslims, for 'the tribe'.

 

Depends how you define both.

How would you say humanism and the OT go hand in hand?

Or humanism and Talmudic Jews?

 

Humanism and any religion don't go hand in hand.

But I'm quite confused by how you would say Islamism and Humanism go together. If you would look back Islamic history you will see Muslims ruling and killing other Muslims. The Caliphs were killed by fellow muslims. The ottomans and barbary pirates come to mind. Sectarian violence has always waged with the Muslims. That's why I think you're a closet Islamist.

 

Tom.

Your position is dull.

Think of a new one.

 

Do you know how many people lost their lives due to the Barbary pirates alone? Educate yourself.

 

Marlowe, if you get bored with your repeats, and want someone a bit better qualified than the Daily Moron, then read what Dr Kevin MacDonald has to say.

Kevin B. MacDonald (born January 24, 1944) is a professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach, best known for his use of evolutionary theory to support his claim that Judaism is a "group evolutionary strategy."

MacDonald's most controversial claim is that a suite of traits that he attributes to Jews, including higher-than-average verbal intelligence and ethnocentricism, have eugenically evolved to enhance the ability of Jews to conspire to out-compete non-Jews for resources while undermining the power and self-confidence of the white majorities in Europe and America whom he insists Jews seek to disposess
.

MacDonald is the author of seven books on evolutionary theory and child development and is the author or editor of over thirty academic articles in refereed journals. He received his B.A. from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1966, and M.S. in biology from the University of Connecticut in 1976. He earned a Ph.D. in 1981 (Biobehavioral Sciences) from the University of Connecticut where he studied under Professor Benson E. Ginsburg, one of the founders and leaders of modern behavior genetics, as his advisor. His thesis was on the behavioral development of wolves and resulted in two publications: MacDonald, K. B., and Ginsburg, B. E. (1981). "Induction of normal behavior in wolves with restricted rearing." Behavioral and Neural Biology, 33, 133-162; MacDonald, K. B. (1983). "Development and stability of personality characteristics in prepubertal wolves." Journal of Comparative Psychology, 97, 99-106, 1983.

He completed a post-doctoral fellowship with Ross Parke at the psychology department of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1983.


**

Theory of Judaism as a "Group Evolutionary Strategy"


MacDonald is best known for his trilogy that analyzes Judaism and Jewish culture from the perspective of evolutionary psychology, comprising A People That Shall Dwell Alone (1994), Separation and Its Discontents (199, and The Culture of Critique (199. He proposes that Judaism is a group evolutionary strategy to enhance the ability of Jews to out-compete non-Jews for resources. Using the term Jewish ethnocentrism, he argues that Judaism fosters in Jews a series of marked genetic traits, including above-average verbal intelligence and a strong tendency toward collectivist behavior, as manifested in a series of influential intellectual movements. MacDonald repeatedly emphasizes that he does not argue that all Jews in all circumstances display the traits he identifies; for example, his Understanding Jewish Influence argues that neoconservatism is a Jewish intellectual movement, while in the 2000 US Presidential Election about 80% of the Jewish vote went to Vice President Al Gore, who was campaigning against George W. Bush whose campaign was heavily staffed with and influenced by neoconservatives.


On Jews and immigration policies

MacDonald says that "the organized Jewish community" has been the single most important and powerful group in favor of unrestricted immigration to the United States, and that the community has been acting in its "own perceived collective interests," regardless of whether these are in conflict with the interests of other Americans.

MacDonald's main thesis centers on the period preceding the 1965 Immigration Act when strict, country-of-origin based quotas existed, mostly favoring immigration from Europe. According to MacDonald, while most of the ethnic communities in that period were somewhat active in trying to affect the increase of immigration quotas from their own countries of origin (i.e., the Irish for immigration from Ireland, Greeks for immigration from Greece, etc.), only the Jewish community activists were requesting (and ultimately obtained in 1965) the dismantling of country-of-origin quotas and an increase in immigration across the board.

This policy shift benefited primarily non-European immigration and had a profound impact on the U.S. demographics in the following decades

MacDonald says that Jews opposed immigration quotas because a diverse America was safer for Jews.

Neoconservatism

MacDonald published a series of three articles in The Occidental Quarterly on the alleged similarities between neoconservatism and several other influential intellectual and political movements that he claims are Jewish-dominated. He argues that "Taken as a whole, neoconservatism is an excellent illustration of the key traits behind the success of Jewish activism: ethnocentrism, intelligence and wealth, psychological intensity, and aggressiveness.
His general conclusions are that neoconservatism fits into a general pattern of twentieth-century Jewish intellectual and political activism. Since Leo Strauss, a philosophy professor, taught several of the putative founders of the neoconservatism movement, MacDonald concludes he is a central figure in the neoconservative movement and sees him as "the quintessential rabbinical guru with devoted disciple".

MacDonald contends that, like Freudian psychoanalysis and Marxism, neoconservatism uses arguments that appeal to non-Jews, rather than appealing explicitly to Jewish interests. MacDonald argues that non-Jewish neoconservatives like Jeane Kirkpatrick and Donald Rumsfeld are examples of an ability to recruit prominent non-Jews while nevertheless preserving a Jewish core and an intense commitment to Jewish interests: "it makes excellent psychological sense to have the spokespeople for any movement resemble the people they are trying to convince


He considers it significant that neoconservatism's supposed commitment to mass immigration is uncharacteristic of past conservative thought and is identical to liberal Jewish opinion.


*Wiki*

 

Now that we've gotten the full blast of your fact-empty HOT AIR, how about if you give us ONE EXAMPLE of Jihad Watch saying anything that is false or incorrect.

 

Originally Posted by aussiefree2ride View Post
"No matter how the facts are stacked, the mindset of islamism is not compatible with harmony and humanitarianism. For any free thinking country to take in large numbers of muslims, is to invite future weakness, and instability of it`s society, by virtue of perpetual division."

Why ? Sounds like he made a quite sensible statement.

 

The Red Crescent, which is the Islamic equivalent of the Red Cross, is one practical demonstration of Islamic humanitarianism in action.

 

LOL.

Jihad Watch.

Oy vey, oy vey...

 

To you.

That does not really count for much, since you have not a wit what you are talking about, on anything.

Imo of course..