It's obvious Abortion is wrong

Good post, I had to laugh at :


""""""Quote Originally Posted by Robert View Post

Does that apply to her crib in her home as well?""""




You: She can have her crib sucked out of her home if she wants.

 

WHAT was the murderers sentence?

 

Your own link says a woman won't show before 12 weeks, and that means showing for the people who are looking for a baby bump. Even if a woman develops a baby bump at 12 to 16 weeks, you or other casual acquaintances have no way of knowing whether the woman is pregnant or merely been gaining weight. If your sister is actually showing at 1 month, she probably has one of the other ailments mentioned in your link, or a multiple pregnancy. Another possibility is that she is farther along than that, either she didn't know she was pregnant or she doesn't want you to know she was pregnant that soon.

 

No, earliest survival was 21 weeks and 6 days. Women having abortions as late as 20 weeks are having them for medical reasons, many defects cannot be detected until around the 20 week stage.

 

You've been looking at protester's sign pictures, didn't you know those are fake? They are late term stillbirths. A picture of an early term abortion really doesn't amount to much.

 

More emotional nonsense. What you're describing resembles a late-term abortion more than any other, and that type is hardly taken lightly or done all that often, and not without some pressing reason that justifies it to some extent when it is done.

 

Your own link proves you wrong!

- - - Updated - - -

Non sequitur!

The topic is whether the fetus is attached or not.

 

Prove that 20 week premature babies have survived.

 

Semantic squirming out of your own OP now?

What does the "removal" of a "parasite" imply?

That you are still going to feed it and care for it once it is removed?

 

What the heck are you talking about? NO where in the post you quoted did she ask men to pay for it:


""""Quote Originally Posted by Zeffy View Post

Only if all who voted to ban abortion had to go through a pregnancy and labour simulator every time a woman who wanted to abort was prevented from doing so legally.
- - - Updated - - -
I don't give a fat rat's arse if it is a baybee, if it's in my body and I don't want it there, it's being removed.""""""


NO WHERE!


Why do think men alone should have a voice in funding?

What funding are you blathering about...??

The same "funding" that goes for any other medical procedure??

 

First of all, there is nothing you can say that will offend me.

If you are pro-life and believe that a woman should be forced to give birth, I will challenge your claim that you care about the unborn child. You will ignore my challenge just like 100% of the pseudo-pro-lifers here on the forum.

The only question is what do we do with those unwanted children. Are you going to step up and offer your love, home, and parenting skills?

Let me translate your post into English:

"I am trying to give others the impression that I care, but in reality, I don't care enough to take on the burden of making these unwanted kids feel wanted, loved, and cared for. It's just too much work for me. It is much easier to post on forums and shake my fist."

 

Izzat so?

Over 200 posts and you want me to understand this has not wavered a bit off the OP?

 

Uh huhhh

Sort of like me telling you that you are to start showing up to perform abortions so you really understand what the baby goes through. Uhhh huhhhh

 

Hahahahahahahaha, your own link proves you wrong.

 

Incorrect. There have been zero preemies that survived that young. The youngest is 21 weeks and 5 days (almost 22 weeks) and I think there are only two that survived that young.

 

This has zero to do with the posts you are responding to.

 

There are other threads for that topic.

If you want your posts deleted for being off topic then sobeit.

However I will not aid and abet the derailing of this thread for your pet peeve.

Have a nice day!

 

Its an awful procedure and I would encourage the mother to consider having the child and putting him/her up for adoption. The problem is that there are way too many unwanted children who will never see the inside of a loving home. If you are a pro-lifer claiming to care about the unborn child, I am challenging your claim by asking how many you have adopted. 100% of pseudo-pro-lifers on this forum care until it involves doing more than posting and shaking fists. It would like me claiming to care about the homeless by insisting they come live with you.

What about the on topic question I asked you? (Post #211)

 

Post #211 was directed at MrNick, not me.

 

D'oh!

My mistake.

 

I'll take that as no, mine, mine mine... The words of an entitled generation. Never want to work for anything, always entitled to someone else's stuff. Don't care if society falls apart as long as they can have theirs now.

 

Of course it is the best argument. It is also a rock solid argument in the early stages of pregnancy.

If anti-aborts really cared about their issue they would give up on the " a single human cell is a living human" nonsense and focus on when the fetus actually has a few characteristics required to make an entity a Homo sapiens.

Even better, if anti aborts really cared about human lives as they claim, they would help born humans in need or at risk.

Such raging hypocrites these folks are.

 

This proves how little you know about me.

 

Did that make your stance on the TOPIC any stronger? No.

 

It's a shame he could not have got hold of one of the devices produced by the company I work for in the UK, it would have enabled him to 'speak' for himself

- - - Updated - - -

Yep, A newborn baby is no longer physically using another person in order to sustain their life, a fetus is.