Jamele Hill goes off the deep end

Honestly, if they get beat up then they get beat up.

 

What criticism was white QBs taking that McNabb was given a free pass on?

So 12-4 is now atrocious and a NFC Championship game is atrocious. Wow.

 

And outside of those moonbats, everyone thinks it's a terrible position.

 

That IS NOT what he said.

He said the LIBERAL SPORTS MEDIA is easier on McNabb, nothing he had to say dealt with McNabb's path except that they gave him a pass because of his race.

 

Trump goes off the deep end and the right make him President



and wow, he wasn't even fired from his show for his tweet

 

How did the Liberal sports media give McNabb an easier path than they did any white QB in the league. History in this league has always shown that black QBs have had a harder road than their white counter parts.

 

AntiFA attacked innocent Trump supporters.

 

Trump called Obama a racist for the content of a speech in '07. Did you consider the content? Or are you upset that Trump used the same standard calling Obama a racist that you have to call HIM a racist?

 

If they're innocent Trump supporters then that's different.

 

Which speech is this btw?

 

But you are. You're supporting the group that gave Nazis in Germany relevance. Ironically - and history repeats itself here - it is your side's thuggish, violent and fascist reaction to protests by the opposition Nazi party in Wedding, Germany (called Red Wedding for its leftist/communist bent) that led to the Nazis being able to seize power in Germany.

Learn your history, and how you're stupidly enabling the very group you claim to wish to defeat.

http://www.salon.com/2017/08/26/how-should-we-protest-neo-nazis-lessons-from-german-history_partner/

Now - clearly - Salon wrote this historically accurate piece within the context of an attempt to draw exact parallels to today wrt to Nazis and Trump (read: Salon is attempting to claim that this will give Trump more power, and they're attempting to associate Trump with Nazis, though no association exists).

But hey: whatever gets you antiFA supporters to knock down antiFA and get them to do the right thing.

Because - at this point - neither you or they are.

 

Have you not seen videos of antiFA attacking Trump rallies? Not neo-Nazi crap, but Trump rallies?

Who do you think got hit over the head with a bike lock?

 

I don't know. The point is: neither did dairyair. All that mattered to him/her/it is that Trump called Obama a racist, without questioning whether or not what he said actually was.

 

And?

 

That's why I said it was something totally different, I didn't say it was cool or necessary.

 

:facepalm:

You are why history repeats itself. You claim you want to make Nazis irrelevant, right?

 

Hey, here's an idea, maybe people are opposing Nazis and white supremacists now is because they don't fcking like them, no one wants to hang around someone who proudly wears a swastika.

 

Opposing, and physically confronting them - allowing an open reminiscence of the same identifying tactics as Nazis themselves - are two different things, and isn't winning you or they the day.

You're losing it.

 

Another thing to consider, micfranklin.

Did you buy the claim from leftists that calling Islamist terrorists things like 'radical Islamist terrorists' and physically opposing them did nothing but assist in their efforts to recruit?

Have you heard that oft repeated narrative? Have you agreed?

 

same thing she did, that is the point, both called the President racist, he is white, he kept his job on the air, and later he became President that someone else called him racist based on his actions

 

No. They are not the same thing. Trump determined Obama to be a racist based upon some specific content in a specific speech, and you didn't even bother to cite the speech or understand the context.

I don't know what context Trump is referencing either, but I'm not the one that brought the comparison. That was you, and you should provide the context of the '07 speech to validate the claim you say is baseless.

 

what nonsense, no one said opposing Muslim terrorist would help them recruit, making it into a religious war would help them by losing support from our allies that are Muslim

 

If they're upset that people are bullying them because they're Nazis, then that's too bad.

 

Terrorists need to be physically opposed because they're a threat, so no.

 

exactly, regardless of their religion