Jeff Flake: ‘We Can’t Have That on the Court’

Who does this sniveling pants waste find the stones to complain about what Kavanaugh did in the committee? With the left wingers assassinating his personal and professional credibility, where does this loon come off finding the indignation that he's asserted in the finding that somehow, now mr Kavanugh might be partisan?

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...cizes-supreme-court-nominee-kavanaugh/571915/

Laughable.

 

I think Flake wants to run against trump in 2020

 

What I find laughable is that the extreme right wing of the party and Trumpeizdas accuse the dEmocrats of running a Plantation but her one of the good GOP guys does something right and you make him out to be a runaway slave.

 

One of the good guys? Flake? Seriously? Well, at least we know where you're head is.. Can you perhaps explain to us the effective way mr Kavanaugh should have defended his honor in the Senate hearing? I mean, put yourself in his shoes. Baseless accusations aside, do you really expect someone to not be angry? More, does that anger then he isn't just stating a fact when he identifies the opposition party in his comments since they are, effectively, the folks assassinating him?

That isn't being partisan. It's being accurate. I would have thought given your history that accuracy was valuable to you. Instead, we see more lame half stepping. Yes, lame.

 

Unlike most right wingers he calls them like he sees them!!

 

Yea to hell with getting to the truth, I just want my man to win at all costs.

 

Thats how democrats are playing it except they want our man to lose

 

Which simply fails. Mr Flake isn't interested in truth here. He's suggesting that Kav can't be a part of the court because of his description of democratic character assassination. Clearly, there is no truth finding in the Flake. And sit on the sidelines while your team is batting away at this guy with air swings. Cause it's not like your team are attempting to "win at all costs" are they? Again, laughable.

 

No money for Flake in the squishy pseudo left center he's placed himself in.....

 

I think soros and other lefties would fund Flake in the primaries

 

Perhaps. I doubt it though. Soros et al have made it clear that their support will be dependent on their various litmus tests for purity. I doubt Flake has any purity left...

 

Kavanaugh is a partisan hack who drinks like a fish and lies like a rug.

 

Your depth is duly noted.....

 

Coons never should have offered him an out. The gop old men should have been forced to vote for Kavenaugh last week. Put them to the test.

 

When Kavanaugh made it clear in his opening remarks he might be partisan...

When he mentioned "revenge on behalf of the Clintons", he might as well have pulled out a MAGA hat and chant 'Lock her up'.... His goose should have been totally cooked at that point, but Mitchy the Kid certainly doesn't care...

In full disclosure, I actually laughed out loud at that statement and I bet others did too (speaking of laughable)..

P.S. Invalid thread title...

 

The right wing may have won some elections here, but, their ideology is in the minority. It will come to an end and thus their fever pitch at getting this guy on the court.

 

Jeff Flake is coward. I expect him to vote against Kavanaugh no matter what and he'll try and get another Republican to defect with him.

 

Another LAUGHABLE Rule 11 violation (courtesy of the RW Troll Squad).

You didn't copy/paste the link verbatim.

The article you cited is Titled:

Jeff Flake 'We Can't Have That on the Court'

If you are going to change the title (and violate Rule 11 with your RW editorializing BS), next time post this sort of RW BS in PO&B

How can you expect to be taken seriously here if you can't even follows the rules of Thread Creation?

Of course, it is obvious that you have long since abandoned any hope of being taken seriously at PF.

So feel free to carry on.

PS--Read the rules.

 

Ok, My new all time favorite quote by a politician. Mr Kennedy . Quote: "If you believe this investigation is about truth.. put the bong down".

Ta Da..

 

Sweet. the thread stasi are here. Thanks. Noted. Title changed. You are fabulous btw... Carry on.

 

He is a never-trumper. It was to placate him essentially that they opened the 7th FBI investigation. This was after he cowered before the protester. Sad to see someone so weak in the Senate.

 

He should have conducted himself in a respectful, cooperative manner much like Hillary Clinton did for 10 hours straight while being viciously attacked by Gowdy and his rabid pack of jackals who were accusing her of far worse crimes than Kavanaugh was charged with. She sat there calm and composed for the entire hearing (lynching party). Compared to that gaggle the Senate Democrats treated Kavanaugh with kid gloves.

Kavanaugh on the other hand acted like a little sissy, rich brat crybaby. He was indignant, sarcastic, nonresponsive, evasive and flippant. His disgusting, sniveling performance certainly showed us all what a weak suck he is. This guy sure is not my kind of guy. He is obviously a viscious little political hatchet man who can dish it out but he sure can't take it. Anyone who defends his disgusting, sniffling, wimpy performance on Thursday is no doubt cut from the same jib...

 

Looks like a Mod stepped in and edited the Thread Title for you.

Just think--if you had followed Rule 11, the Mods wouldn't have to follow you around all day cleaning up your messes.

Please try to have more respect for PF's Hard-Working Mods in the future (by following the Rules).

Thanks in advance.

Oh, and on topic, as to Flake:

The jury is still out.

Carry on.

 

He came across an a Paranoid DELUSIONAL RW Tinfoil Hat.

Mentioning "the Clintons"?

Kavanaugh is a Paranoid RW LOON, who makes Alex Jones seem reasonable.

 

Yikes... Hillary was respectful? Cooperative even you say.. I mean, seriously, there's video... And to be fair, if you're going to use this as an example, be prepared to also have to defend the many many lies she uttered, the half truths she mumbled, all in her "respectful, and cooperative" testimony. She did what she always does, she endured. And frankly why shouldn't she have? She thought she was going to be President. Well, I suppose you can see who got the last laugh out of that one.

I'll put it to you a bit more pointedly though. Ms Feinstein was assuming that he'd be, as you suggested, subservient. Demure even. "respectful" to a fault. That was obviously the calculus. Why? Because you could use that feigned indifference in a thousand election ads showing just what a putz Kav would have been. Now? They have footage of him credibly decimating ms Feinstein. Guess he didn't get the memo on the plan, huh? Fun stuff. I look forward to his future rulings from the SC.