Is it true that new evidence has been found pretaining to a fatal shot coming from inside the car and another shot was proven to have been fired from the grassy knoll?
No...don't fall for the conspiracy lunicy my friend, you only aid these idiots in their continued money making scams. Time and technology have only solidified the Warren Report and slammed the stupid House Select Committee as the partisan, pro-liberal, anti-American pile of s***t that it always has been. There were 3 shots, fired from one rifle, by one individual who had motive, material, training and opportunity presented to him by a self-absorbed, over-grandizing, over-rated Boston idiot. Lee Oswald killed JFK, the story is over.
Yep.Look at this thread of Sevens. - - - Updated - - - Yep.Look at this thread of Sevens and read through all his posts here.also read my last post on his thread.its pretty clear cut the driver shot JFK. http://www.politicalforum.com/jfk/223484-driver-killed-kennedy-right-rear-exit-evidence.html It doesnt sound like you have seen the movie JFK with Kevin Costner that Oliver Stone directed either.You should see that movie soon as you can. Only the people in denial and afraid of the truth who after seeing that movie will still say oswald killed kennedy.there was never a shread of evidence as you will see when you see the movie. when stone made that movie,he sifted through thousands of documents that a reseacher in dallas had gathered over the years to make that movie and I met the researched in dallas Larry Howard was his name,and asked him how accurate the movie was and he said about 95%. the movie was 100 time more accurate to the truth on what actually happened that what the warren commission said,thats for sure. as far as the shooter behind the fence? yeah there was a shooter behind the fence.If you look at Grodens book,you can see a photo where you can see a man behind the picket fence with a rifle which a few witnesses reported seeing. He was there as a diversion so everybody would be focused on him shooting while William Greer,the driver of the car who had connections to the CIA,fired the fatal head shot. there were many witnesses who came forward and gave versions different than the governments who ended up dying in very mysterious ways. Because of that,many witnesses that were there that day who saw a gunman behind the picket fence with a rifle,they have come forward years later and talked about seeing that man.they kept quiet for many years because of the fact so many people died.there used to be a special on the history channel that exposed all that called THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY.as well but for starters,since your new to the event,I would for sure see the movie JFK sometime.the movie is what got me interested.
Dont listen to the lies and propaganda of what the second poster said.The first poster is correct.You should read through his link.the second poster has no answers to these links of information of videos I posted in my first thread here http://www.politicalforum.com/jfk/2...kill-kennedy-but-did-not-kill-tippet-wel.html nor to these facts below.they lone nut theorists blatantly ignore these facts below as well and have no answers for them. http://www.politicalforum.com/jfk/2...ll-kennedy-but-did-not-kill-tippet-wel-2.html read my last post on this thread. http://www.politicalforum.com/jfk/2...ll-kennedy-but-did-not-kill-tippet-wel-2.html it clearly spells it out that Oswald was innocent and there was a conspiracy by the CIA to kill him.
so dont listen to any of those nuts.they have no debating skills and they ignore the facts all the time.
I'm actually not new to the event, taking that I did a 6 page paper on his assassination for Black History Month back in school. I aimed it towards the alleged 2 black people that were having a coke on the grassy knoll and they would have been key witnesses to identify the man whith the rifle taking they were right there beside the fence, or more of on the wall there. Most of it was about the findings of the assassination and things like that which appointed the driver as the possible shooter but I never believed Oswald assassinated him nor assassinated him alone..... My uncle was rprpior service Navy Seal and Sniper, highly decorated for what they could decorate him for and some that he claims they couldn't because of certain variables, but he was not allowed to discuss the situation with it but he talked to us so much about facts and fiction, ballistics, range of motion, distance and manuverablility. I have wathced the Kevin Costner movie, I've watched 3 other movies pertaining to the assassination as well as rtead books, articles, and of course informative material but I was told that more evidence came about that discredited the grassy knoll shooter (whom allegedly fired above the car) as the assassin, and Oswald (whom couldn't have made those shots with the conditions of the rifle, position of car to kennedy, and speed of motocade against his range of motion from the window) according to some, he (Lee Harvey Oswald) would've had to lean out of the window, virtually blowing his cover fire, and aim to fire off the shots...the rate of fire isn't difficult with basic marksmanship training but rifle condition and range of fire would increase difficulty by so much when it comes to accuracy.... but I would like to read more on the assassination.
your one of the few people that have posted in this section that understands all that stuff.there is this one book written as well that talks about that also called KILLZONE where this decorated sniper who served in vietnam,onne day at a convention in dallas he went up to the 6th flloor museum to kill time cause there was a delay at the convention and he looked down and he knew no way did oswald do it cause he knew as a trained sniper,he could not have done i and that it would require a tame to pull it off.. so dont listen to any of those nuts.they have no debating skills and they ignore the facts all the time. i should say just dont listen to the nut who endorced the lies of the warren commission,seven made a great thread you should look into as well.
That movie is a pile of dog s***t full of classic conspiracy lies that have no basis in fact. JFK was no where near pulling out troops from Vietnam by 1963. If anything, JFK had increased the danger of nuclear war by his actions against Cuba which precipitated the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. As for Jim Garrison, he was a retarded, self-glory seeking ass-h**le, his whole attempt at a trial was a disgrace and should have never gone to a judge let alone a grand jury and his mythical conspiracy theory was the basis for another self-grandized American hater named Robert Blakey who chaired the infamous House Sellect Com-sh***ty on Assasinations in the 1970's. All liberal shams and lies of course.
A mythical sniper...big f**ken deal! Don't fall for the "because I'm an expert with a title bull s**t." facts are facts. Oswald had more than enough experiance with a rifle, he'd been shooting rifles since he was 8 years old. His Marine recruit rifles scores were average to above average using iron sites with an M-1 Garand. He was a very good shot. It's obvious he didn't use the scope that day in Dallas, he didn't have to. He tried using it when he shot at retired Army General Walker a year before. No one has yet proven the Warren Report wrong, no one has brought forth any other suspects because they didn't exist. Oswald had motive, he had the opportunity and thanks to JFK's ego grandzing and that ridgid backbrace he was wearing....three shots, one dead average president. case closed.
Gee, your Uncle was a Navy Seal? What was his name and rank so I can bounce him against the official list of those who completed BUDS? Sounds like a load of bull.
Jim Mars? Ask yourself what qualifies this dumb bastard to be an expert in anything. Mars has no professional experiance that qualifies him as an investigator, a weapons expert, a criminologist or medical expert so why would you accept anything from such a person? He hasn't even fired, let alone handled, a Carcano. If you want to know what a Carcano can do, ask someone who owns and fires one. By the way...I own a Carcano.
thats what all your posts are,lies.I love how you conveintly forget to mention the jury while not convinced that shaw was involved,did say they were convinced there was a conspracy. oh and Richard Helms the former CIA director later admitted that Clay Shaw indeed did work for the CIA.Doesnt sound like Garrison was retarded to me.Your posts are retarded though.Just like the warren commissions conclusions were retarded with NO EVIDENCE!!! how much your bosses pay you to make this crap up? You just hate blakely because he proved all you do is ramble,that the warren commission was wrong,saying there was a second shooter.lol. Oh and stones movie was 100 times more accurate than the fairy tales of the warren commission.we both know that.you fail miserably in your posts.nobody is listening to you and i wont reply anymore to your posts full of lies either.you are obviously not committed to the truth,its obvious what your agenda here is and you fail at it.
facts that you blatantly ignore.you have no answers for the facts in that JFK BUSH CONNECTION vido that has overwhelming evidence it that it was a conspiracy and as always,you lying,many books have proven the warren commission wrong as we both know.miserable fail as always!!!!!! hahahahahahahaa,yep it was a conspiracy,case closed. - - - Updated - - - sure you have.like anybody should believe anything YOU say.hahahahahahahahahahaa - - - Updated - - - Oh the irony. the only one here that sounds like a load of bull is YOU.HAHAHAHAHAHAA
You have NO FACTS! Nothing in that video is provablein a court of law, all hearsay and b.s. stories from misfits like you who parrot each other and support each other with the money you waste giving them a living. You conspiracy people are a gang of sorry misfits. The bottom line with Garrison was....NOT GUILTY! NO PROOF! The jury wasn't convinced no matter what you spout they said, they came to the conclusion that Claw Shaw was not involved in any conspiracy to kill John Kennedy. Case closed.
Richard Helms.......oooooooo....another jerk who made money off appearances for JFK related material.....would not stand up in a court of law.
TO WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN: (rotflmao) I chose to requote you simply for 2 reasons due to a very unique point of view has registered to me. Several others participating in the debate is the 1st and the 2nd is this... " to entertain utter stupidity is a lack of self-confidence in one's own intellect!" ~ Book of Scorpio 5:22 Basically stating that an attempt to persuade belligerence and/or retorical non-sense is what is called "baiting" and we are DEBATING so whenever you decide to grow out of adolesence, we shall continue debating. (If you can understand that)
I will ask you again to prove that your Uncle was a Navy SEAL, give me his name so I may check it against the registry of those who have completed BUDS training. There is a real NAVY SEAL who makes it his mission to out imposters and I have his e-mail. if you refuse then all you said carries no weight. And even an expert sniper, Navy SEAL or other poser will overlook simple evidence in order to prove a personal or political or monitary bent towards conspiracy theories. Another simple question, look at the fall lay of the 3 spent cartridge hulls from Oswalds rifle and deduce for me how each fell where they did. It is you who show utter stupidity, even deception in your refusal to offer proof of your facts. Just because you say your uncle was a SEAL doesn't carry weight in an investigation....as Reagan once said...trust but verify, verify then trust.
