Sooooooooo... ...you support Gerry Studds for boinking an under-aged male congressional page just like all the rest of the hypocritical liberals who supported him did? The hypocrite liberals even re-elected him. Several times.
Why are you lying about me? Is your argument so weak that you have to lie about me? I guess if you are so divorced from reality that you can't tell between child rape and adult consensual sex, you probably can't tell between my statements and the voices in your head.
Translation: I refuse to rule myself. Our prisons, insane asylums, and zoos are populated with such a mentality.
Pedophilia by example and word is worse than outright force because it corrupts the soul of the innocent.
Are you going to answer MY question or not? I was nice enough to answer yours when you asked. What's YOUR answer to MY question?... http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=455107&p=1066148230#post1066148230B]
Your liberal brethren supported one of their own who had CONSENTUAL sex with a minor. Do you support what your liberal brethren supported? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Now all you have to do is prove that the "soul" exists and that it can be corrupted. - - - Updated - - - No. I don't. Do you support your conservative brethren in Russia violating the rights of gays?
LOLOL!!! - - - Updated - - - That's not what they are doing so your decerebrate question is bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
The funny part is, performing the "gay anal taste test" is enough to get you convicted of gaydom, in kenya. PS Isnt that where obama is from?
1. Yes, typos are hilarious to idiots. 2. They most definitely are. Any civil rights attorney worth their salt would have a field day with Russia's policies. Everything from the government refusing to protect gays from physical assault to aggressively attacking their freedom of speech and expression is a violation of gays' rights.
No, I need prove nothing, especially when it is self evident. Though your willfulness and inability to address it is duly noted.
You don't just get to arbitrarily say things are "self-evident" when it comes to using government power to restrict others' rights. If you want to use government power to restrict the rights of gays, you need to be able to prove your claims.
Putin is the leader of your gay - fixated front. only Western far -right , bamboo people, and Putlerists see homosexuality as an issue. ps tastes - testes, after Crimea anything is possible , when it comes to Putler
[video=youtube;pwLvPR2KedI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwLvPR2KedI[/video] Putin´s best friend Kisel, about homosexuals....
the topic would be more of a US and World news section but the supporting post within the OP does not meet the standards. It's an interesting topic because sovereign nations can have any laws they wish including laws against gay-sex.
Do you know what would be super-de-duper? If heteros would STOP telling gays how and what they should think and feel about what affects them. Do you think yall can do that?
