Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”

Leaked Bilderberg Documents: “Nationalism Is Dangerous”
Infowars exclusively obtains Senator’s notes, minutes, agenda from 1966 confab

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Editor’s Note: We have obtained hundreds of documents from the 1966 meeting. This is a Wikileaks-sized data dump and we will be writing several more articles over the next few days to cover the myriad of different issues at hand.

Leaked documents from the 1966 Bilderberg Group conference exclusively obtained by Infowars betray how even as far back as five decades ago U.S. Senators were being indoctrinated with the belief that “nationalism is dangerous” by Bilderberg elitists, in addition to top union heads scheming behind their members’ backs with titans of capitalism and industry.



Previously leaked documents from meetings have illustrated how the Bilderberg Group, contrary to the media-generated myth that the confab represents a harmless talking shop, sets the consensus for policy decisions sometimes decades in advance.

A clear example is the 1955 Bilderberg meeting held in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, West Germany. Documents read by the BBC and later released by Wikileaks divulge how Bilderberg members were discussing the creation of the euro single currency nearly 40 years before it was officially introduced in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

Continued


Comment: Good Find Infowars, this is going to be interesting. Spilling all the evil beans of the elites plans against us in 1966, and they are still doing it!

 

Well I cerainly agree that nationalism is dangerous.. Its always aggressive and the complete opposite of Patriotism.

 

But they want and end of the USA, and a world government run by them and their buddies. And most people dead.

Do you agree with that?

 

Any thread that has infowars.com as a source should be in the conspiracy section. For all we know Alex Jones had those made up.

 

You should be more worried about Special interest Corporate News...Thats where the problem is, like Foxnews owner said "we tell you the news we want you to know"

David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
Bilderberg

 

There is absolutely nothing valid about infowars.com as a source. This thread should be moved.

 

Yes there is, they aren't special interest corporate MSM news. Don't you understand how the MSM is used against the people and not for us? Infowars does a great job at exposing what the establishment hides from the people they are screwing, which would be "we the people"

 

No offense, but that's ridiculous. Infowars is like Wikipedia.

Would you believe it if one of the big companies reported it?

 

Way to ignore his post.

 

They have more credibility than Fox, MSNBC, and CNN at this point, to be honest.

 

Well for sure, Infowars is run by normal people who know we are in a battle for our republic and our lives.
MSM, is run by special interests corps, like MSNBC owned by GE who makes money on wars, and all the smiling people who read to us off teleprompters aren't worried about our republic and lives, they are just worried about their jobs, they are just doing their jobs...just like TSA.

 

No it should not.

I am sick of people like you demanding that threads be moved here, simply because you do not like the link or the narrative.

Get this...it is not your forum to make such demands, so rather than stamp your feet, why not address the content?

Would you prefer it it came from Fox?

 

Depends what you mean by 'nationalism', Margot.

In 2014, Scots will get to vote on whether or not they wish to leave the union.

We have Scottish Nationalists, indeed, Scottish Nationalists run our Parliment.

But all they want is for Scotland to self determine fully, and to promote Scottish interests in Scotland.

It is nationalism. But it has never and won't be violent, dangerous, or para militaristic.

Why is that?

Jack

 

I don't see any purpose for the elites of countries around the world to meet behind closed doors - unless the purpose is nefarious. If the purpose was to promote good will and prosperity, hold the (*)(*)(*)(*) meetings in front of the cameras.

 

So you are a Scot, I'm part MacKenzie

 

This whole thread is continuing to fill up with conspiracy theories. Time to report it and get it moved. Infowars.com is a laughable source. Period.

 

I think you are going to see a real rise in independent media again, and that is a good thing.

In 1980, over 50 companies covered and ran the US media. All indp of one another, and any other.

Now there are six.

And there narrative is much the same.

This has been on purpose, not all $ related, and entirely damaging.

People are so fed up, that they are turning to their own research and other media.

Good for them.

That is what they should do.

For too long we have been too lazy to do our own reading.

Anything that stimulates people to do that is good.

For too long people have contaminated their brain with a monologue from an owned media that has a bad agenda.

Anything that removes them from that is a good thing, and the media hate it when people do not pay attention to their version.

Viewing figures for much of MSM are down 30% in some cases.

The media have been put on trial.

Charged with lying all the time.

And dumbing people down.

The verdict is guilty - no doubt.

The sentence should be financial ruination.


Jack

 

Why not stop moaning and acting like a control freak, and address the OP and the information?

How about THAT?

 

Hopefully the important part!

 

That looks about as genuine as the Bammer's Hawaiian birth certificate.

 

They could do that actually, as a trick, an appeasement.

A false flag.

They could have two meetings.

One that was public, and talked a lot of cuddly waffle.

And another that was private and still dealt with the gritty things.

I am surprised they have not thought of that?

The naive would lap it up.

 

Hey I'm being nice. Personally I think the whole thread should be deleted completely since there is NOTHING to talk about. It's a laughable source reporting something that is TOTALLY unprovable. There is no way to prove that those documents are real or not. This is not a proper thread, it's a hit job based on nada, nothing, zilch.

 

Other people seem to disagree with you though.

If a thread is moved simply on the basis that one does not like the source/link, then we would be in big bother, eh?

 

Allot of these threads, I would say a majority of threads are based off nothing more than opinion. You want to censor those as well?

 

I think it needs to be done.

We could just have threads started by Belus.

With links given and approved by Belus.

We are ALL Belus.