Let's debunk what CO2 does. Let's also explain what it does not do.

I hoped you understood that Carbon Dioxide is not a solid but is a gas. And it is heavier than air.

 

What happened is I hit a nerve. Had I stuck to the two poles, more than likely you would have been fine.

 

I hoped you might learn about Carbon Dioxide since at this point you do not understand it.

 

So for the second time you ask for a source, I provide one and you ignore it. It is starting to look like you don't want to discuss this at all.

Not only are you still trying to change the subject to regional weather, now you are under the impression that CO2 stays within national borders.

 

Why is it that denialists always ignore that whole "global" part of global warming?

 

You mention Coral Reefs with no blow back. I mention deserts and get nothing more than blowback. Funny innit?

Look, I am able to deal with Calculus. So do not teach me average. I passed that so long ago, it got mouldy.
'
OK, let's study Australia to get to the heat waves you mention and see what causes it in Australia.

 

I watched your video. I learned nothing new.

This is not about me. So try discussing only the topic. When I tell you I am under the impression that CO2 stays inside borders, then and only then can you accurately make such a claim as to what i think.

 

Why do alarmists alarm?

 

Let's check on the Global warming in the USA.

 

What course was that? If I remember correctly it was a course on weather balloons. Could it have been in the thread where you were denying Evolution?

 

There are also carbon dioxide scrubbers in modern submarines that prevent the content from getting so high its harmful to humans. The Earth has no such system for its biosphere.

Or rather, it does, but we are doing our damndest to kill it.

 

I

If you didn't learn anything new, then you already knew the warming effect of doubling atmospheric CO2, so I'm not sure why you asked for physics that you now say you already knew.

 

CO2 is a gas.

the atmosphere is full of gases.

try again.

your lexicon on this subject is severely basic and lacking.

 

OK, clearly you are no pilot. FAA mandates one study the course on weather and in the course global climate is written about. Frankly there was nothing there that I recall on this alleged man made climate. I think at one point the natives believed if they danced and hit drums and chanted, they could change weather.

As to Weather balloons, that is not what I spoke of though I can't say I am shocked to read such dishonesty.

I don't believe I denied evolution. I believe I focused on abiogenesis. I further pointed out that you can see evolutyion in front of you by looking at your own family. Notice no two family members looks 100 percent alike. I can't rule out at least a particular pair of twins seems alike, even parents can tell the difference.

 

You are at last making progress. I will try to help you understand lexicon.

 

Frankly I hoped you had something brand new.
Actually if you read my evidence, you will learn that there really was a hiatus. Dr. Curry testified on that to congress. The flawed report saying there was no hiatus I debunked by the report of a former SR climate scientist who retired from NOAA. Bates is his last name. Did you read his report? I posted it so you could read it and link to his report.

 

Good point we can focus on. Earth indeed has scrubbers. All are currently working extremely well.

To harm humans, carbon dioxide has to exceed by a good margin, 20,000 ppm. We are not close to that right now.

 

lol, 20,000 ppm and we'd all be dead. The report you are talking about is talking about has nothing to do with global warming. It is a straw man that tries talking about what levels would be dangerous to inhale.

If you are familiar with the physics in the video you watched, you'd know that any "hiatus" (which only exists in cherry-picking nonsense in the first place) is ephemeral.

 

Will you so kindly prove to us all that 20,000 ppm kills humans?
Your video did not mention the hiatus. Maybe you never watched it.

I have offered proof from one Mr Bates on the hiatus issue. Seems you did not read his short commentary.

 

They are not working extremely well. Massive deforestation is occurring all over the world and ocean acidification is killing the CO2 scrubbers there too.

 

Accurate, but irrelevant.

I wouldn't expect an FAA course on climate to discuss what causes climate change. However, it is good of you to acknowledge that. Since there was no discussion on the causes of climate change in the FAA course you took, why did you bother posting...

Was it to convey a false impression of your expertise on the subject?

I did say "If I remember correctly". Are you stating that your FAA course contained nothing regarding the use of weather balloons?

None of which has anything to do with evolution.

But set's see. Do you accept the Theory of Evolution (ToE) including what some refer to as Macro Evolution?

 

We all live in a yellow submarine
Yellow submarine, yellow submarine
We all live in a yellow submarine
Yellow submarine, yellow submarine​

Now we know why. Too damn much CO2!

 

What you expect is not relevant. Why did you bring that up?

Climate did not begin with the revelation by Al Gore, Earth is warming up. FAA is Government. FAA rules on pilot training is extremely strict. It has to be complete. It won't make you a doctor of climate study, but they do learn how the system of the Earth works. We know that Summer at Australia is not the same months as Summer in the USA. We do not have but one global weather system. The planet is very large. While other planets are larger, this one is large enough it takes days using some means of transportation to get all the way around. Even the modern 550 mph jet airplane takes over 2 days to fly all the way around Earth. Add in stops for fuel and maybe food and you see the problem. (They must refuel during the trip)

Since we often are told the science to cause global warming is pretty old, dating back to the 1800's, naturally since we pilots have long flown in a variety of weather conditions, some extremely dangerous, thus avoided, such as thunderstorms, the FAA would have brought up changes to climate. It would prepare pilots better to realize that with such changes, comes danger. I tend to doubt that today FAA gets into the topic of global warming. However that is, there is not one of us who can relate truthful claims we got harmed by a changing climate. All the alarmists forget to tell us when they got harmed or when it took place.

 

really? did they teach you this at FAA training?

LOL!!!!

 

Why weren't you watching the Trump speech so you could mock him? I get notices from PBS for a variety of live broadcasts. Democrats on the PBS site were very mouthy.