Major Democrat, Clinton Donor Indicted for Fraud, Violating Iran Sanctions

Pay for play at its finest.

https://m.theepochtimes.com/major-d...r-fraud-violating-iran-sanctions_2728343.html

I haven't been able to track down yet the huge contribution to the Clinton foundation yet that isn't behind a paywall... but I will. I know it is over 100k... in addition to 100k to the indelibly tied Terry McCauliff at that time.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/local/mcauliffe-clinton/

Millions of dollars go into Clinton coffers, billions go out in fraudulent contracts.

Scurry. Let's hear it.

 

Iran is not nearly the threat Saudi Arabia is.....just sayin

 

A Clinton supporter indicted?? Say it isn't so...

 

Overbilling the Pentagon 4 billion dollars to not build the 8 billion dollar contract is a bit of a scandal wouldn't you say? And the KSA is building nukes and is the #1 state sponsor of terrorism? Using govt funding to funnel projects through a sanctioned enemy of the US is bad. Thoughts?

 

How so? What has the SA Govt done to America?

 

Sounds likes a crime to me... and all crimes should be punished accordingly.... Thoughts?

 

So the company lied to the military in order to get a contract.
How does that implicate Clinton? She was not in charge of handing out military contracts in 2012. Or ever.

 

Just sayin wrong then.

The biggest state sponsor of terrorism on the planet is Iran. On what planet is Saudi Arabia worse?

 

Including pay for play... thoughts?

 

It implicates Clinton, because a person who donates millions of dollars to the Sec of State gets billions of dollars in contracts that the defraud on that nobody notices until an IG report 7 years later.

 

Millions? Millions?

The report says that $13,000 was donated to various Clinton campaigns since the 90s. That's peanuts.
And she was SecState. Not handing out military contracts.
The guy LIED to the military to get the contract. This isn't pay for play. It is smearing by association.

 

"Pay for Play" is not always a crime.... Fraud and Violating sanctions is...

 

Clintons being Clintons....all Dem leadership does is get rich off the taxpayer.

 

Millions. Hundreds of thousands to Clinton interests, and we don't have a figure yet to the Clinton foundation itself, save that it was over 100k. I know you have no interest in actually following the money. And Open Secrets has more than 13k personally from his homemaker wife alone. Then there are ahman corporate and other family donations. A full accounting is forthcoming, but you can put together about 1 mil with available above board contributions.

 

Lol... ok. You run with that.

 

Anyone else shocked donations to the Clinton Foundation have dried up since she lost in 2016? I'm not....it's obvious why the "donations" were made now.

 

That's a terrible way to create a connection. Simply saying that 'because Clintons got money, and someone else got something that was connected to the Govt, then there MUST be a connection'.

You have to show that the individual receiving the money (Clinton) had the ability and/or means to make the approvals for said projects.

 

To influence the decision. The Clinton legacy is mired in this sort of influence peddling. At what point do you say "Another one? The is starting to feel like more than coincidence."?

 

You still have to show that she would even be able to have said influence.

And there are an epic ton of accusations, lots of calls into investigations, at least one FBI investigation that has seemed to have gone nowhere (the last news reports were Jan/Feb of this year) over a witness for the Steele Dossier, but that's literally It.

I mean, for the amount of mud thrown against this particular wall, and for literally (as of this moment) Nothing to stick, through multiple changes of Party Control of the various levels of Govt, shows me that it's likely more hot-air. Show me something more substantial then 'money to Clinton, Govt does something'.

 

Keep connecting them dots. With all that horseshit you are finding, you'll get to that pony later than sooner.

 

Lock her up.

 

That's the spirit. She hasn't committed any criminal offence, but lock her up.
Just - why - because she is Hillary Clinton?

 

Not her, Ivanka.

 

I'll wait for someone to be convicted before calling for them to be locked up.

 

KBR got a no-bid contract from the army in Irak. KBR was a subsidiary of Halliburton. KBR defrauded the US government on that contract. Cheney had been the CEO at Halliburton. Playing guilt by association is way too easy. Pretty much anyone commiting fraud in BIG numbers will have government acces left or right and will have donated to left and right (or both). Halliburton donated over 1 million dollars to RNC and various republican PACs in 98 and 99 before Bush and Cheney ran. Coincidence? I dont think so. I will get outraged when you show me a real conection. Right now all this story is is: big company commits fraud.