Don't forget to BUY those LOTTERY tickets once you CRACK that "unique code structure" so you can "win big" actual money too.
Theordox must be about the third or fourth alias that he has had in the last 2 or 3 years all posting the same nonsense
We can predict future events in science , what makes you think numbers are any different ? The odds of any number being drawn in any lottery or finite numbers game is 1/t . Anyway I'm now on a new campaign , forgetting science , I have to free African people from tyrants .
If it was nonsense I posted you'd see a challenge to my work which there isn't . Alias? I challenge any scientist on universal physics and I already know they'd lose the challenge because axioms don't lie . I'd like to put science ''on trial'' and i'd be the prosecution ! I'll give science 10/1 odds too , I'm that confident !
Hard to "forget" something you NEVER knew in the first place but I will give you credit for acknowledging that your attention span has significant limitations.
The final line of defense for desperate failure is proclaiming the dominant a troll . People can see all you ever say is blah blah blah without actual scientific discussion . Your attempt as regular trolls will probably influence the moderators in banning me . I suspect you are English and don't wan't me talking to NASA about rocket improvements
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA! Another LEGEND in their own mind! If YOU are banned then YOU only have YOURSELF to BLAME for FAILING to abide by the forum RULES that EVERYONE else manages to do successfully. Sad!
Thank you very much , your support is kindly appreciated . I am trying to help the world but science is refusing to listen even though I present axiom premises for argument .
YOU posted this FALSEHOOD about other members; I explained that all YOU need to do is to FOLLOW the rules in order to NOT be banned. How difficult is it for YOU to comprehend something that simple?
I recall other members referring to me as a troll , namely yourself ! ''Agreed! Trolls do tend to give themselves away by regurgitating their drivel.'' You are not a physicist so your drivel is irrelevant as you can't give objective scientific counter argument . You are claiming falsity in my scientific findings but can't backup that claim , in essence that which makes you a hypocritical person . Of course you have the opportunity to backup your claim and actually have a scientific discussion ?
The first and last expressions, m = q1 + q2/ V and v(hf) = E/V(Quote) are not equalities, since both sides have different dimensions. If you have charge on one side of the expression, you must have units of charge on the other side.. You said that q was charge. The 3rd expression has energy on one side times velocity and the other side has energy divided by volume. I have never seen QUOTE in an equation. This is all B.S. and you have no credibility here. You have wasted my time and the time of others. You are violating forum rules by knowingly posting false information and you should be banned.
Are you a physicist ? Define false information ? You and others just can't comprehend what am I saying and this forum will not let me upload models that show you what I am talking about . I have done a quantifiable measure of photons energy in this thread , I have explained that the speed of light is zero , I have explained several axioms and postulates that demonstrate science is full of errors in thought . My physics is real physics , your mathematical measures are measures , not physics . Do you want to challenge my physics ? Why don't you start with explaining what mass is so I can destroy your fake ideology ? No doubt you won't accept the challenge and either : 1)not reply 2)Say something like a waste of your time P.s It isn't velocity times hf , it is the velocity of hf is equal to energy divided by volume which is the transition speed of light .
Thank you for DISQUALIFYING yourself from any further meaningful exchanges as far as I am concerned. Have a nice day!
No problem , I have better things to do than wasting my time talking to arrogant people who might as well believe in fairies with their physics beliefs . Instant
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Given that YOU are NOT a QUALIFIED physicist by YOUR own admission you are in NO position to claim to have any "expertise". Hilarious!
Have you ever heard that a person who spends lot of time doing something , they become experts in that something ? I don't see anybody challenging my physics , do you ? P.s Grow up Troy or is it Ed ? Are you with me
How are you MISSING all of the RESPONSES that DEBUNK your nonsensical blather? By YOUR own admission you are ONLY 26 years old which is NOT a "long time" therefore you just NULLIFIED your own claim to being an "expert". Too FUNNY for words.
I am not a physicist but I have a B.S. in physics. I also took courses in electrical engineering and worked 10 years as an electrical engineer. You are right that I can't comprehend what you are saying. Planck's constant times frequency is the energy of a quantum of light at that frequency. Light generally acts like a wave but when it acts like a particle it can make a frequency (or energy) transition. The energy transition of a quantum of light when an electron in an atom changes from 1 orbital to another is instantaneous, so the velocity would approach infinity. According to you, if I understand you correctly, this instantaneous change in a quantum of energy = energy of something divided by the volume of something. You didn't provide any narrative or description of whatever physical process that you were talking about, didn't provide any units for the variables, didn't show a constant of proportionality if one exists that would be the only way to make a couple of your expressions dimensionally correct. Your expression of velocity (transition) = energy/volume is not dimensionally correct. BTW, did you write this: Is the speed of light zero? Einsteins postulate is that the speed of light is constant but Einsteins postulate does not explain the quantum mechanics of how the speed is achieved . A photon does not have a propulsion mechanism therefore I propose the photons momentum is a consequence of gravitational transition . Gravitational transition being higher energy states progressing to lower energy state spatial points . Explaining the process Momentum hf = F<E Suggesting that photons are attracted by force to lesser energy state points rather than having an unique speed of its own. A comparison to spectral transitions . Last edited: Oct 26, 2020
The thread, "Is the speed of light zero", had some interesting comments. Can anyone explain why this poster on page 2 said that "c" is not the speed of light in a vacuum? All of the textbooks say it is and I have seen how this equation was derived (E=mc2) so I am perplexed. "Nope. You notion on the speed of light carries an assumption; one that is illustrated by the fact that light can be slowed (it’s been done), it can be imaged (cool paradox, eh?), and even imaged such to show it’s duality, and it can be frozen (this has been done as well). And yes, we can tell when it has. The speed of light does not change time, that would be a misunderstanding of Special Relativity. In the simple equation e = mc2 what is C? Though many refer to it as the speed of light, it isn’t, yet it seems conventional to use that euphemism...why? Answering that question will go a ways in clearing confusion as well as why the euphemism is still used, though it is misleading." Back to the OP post, photons travel at the maximum speed because they have zero rest mass. All particles with a zero rest mass travel at the speed of light and no explanation is needed for how that speed is achieved. Those massless particles don't interact with the Higg's field., which is the source of mass. Notice that the "equation" Momentum hf = F less than E is not dimensionally correct unless one concludes that the author is talking about the change in momentum of a quantum of energy = some force, perhaps gravity but force and energy are two different things, so what does force less than energy mean?
In simple algebra form we could state a/b a=hf b=spatial volume Edit : The rest of my post has just been high jacked and vanished before my eyes huhhh? .
I give up , I have just wrote a long response in reply and it vanished sorry . Nuclear Fission , the energy is extracted by force . The Sun , the energy is extracted by force , That force is negative energy F=<E hf →F
