Massive Oil Spill in Yellowstone River Contaminates Drinking Water

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by TheTaoOfBill, Jan 26, 2015.

  1. TheTaoOfBill

    TheTaoOfBill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    13,146
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/e...ellowstone-river-contaminates-drinking-water/

    40,000 gallons of oil spills into the yellowstone river. Yet another example that it's not if a pipeline leaks. It's when. We should not be putting a pipeline through one of our largest source of fresh drinking water! This is why I support Obama's keystone veto threat. The few thousand jobs it will create (almost all of which temporary) is not worth the potential damage!
     
  2. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,376
    Likes Received:
    91,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's not if a car will crash, it's when.
    It's not if a plane will crash, it's when.
    It's not if people will electrocuted, it's when.
    It's not if a gas leak will blow up a house, it's when.
    It's not if Muslims will attack, it's when.

    Should we do away with everything that might harm us some day?
     
  3. TheTaoOfBill

    TheTaoOfBill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    13,146
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    None of those things can cause massive irreversible damage to our water supply.
     
  4. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If I've said it once I'll say it a thousand times, the right could care less. Once the pipeline is complete, the job numbers will be down to a trickle. This is all right-wing politics for their donors. Nothing more! It's pathetic!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Prime example that they have zero argument for this pipeline, with his ridiculous counter argument. What a joke.
     
  5. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,147
    Likes Received:
    63,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    is this a private pipeline like the keystone pipeline, will the tax payers get stuck with the bill for the cleanup?
     
  6. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,376
    Likes Received:
    91,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But your argument against it is that it's OK for other countries to have a possible oil leak so you can get your gas as long as it's not here. I thought we were all global citizens, you know, my oil leak is your oil leak and so on. have you ever thought that, even though accidents will happen, they're less likely to happen here because of all the regulations we have? But with XL being killed the pipeline will now move to Canada where we have no control over the safety and environmental standards they'll employ.
     
  7. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    nevermind the fact that this private FOREIGN corporation is being allowed to use eminent domain to FORCE American landowners to sell their property.

    what kind of bull(*)(*)(*)(*) is this???
     
  8. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,376
    Likes Received:
    91,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Irreversible? That's total and absolute BS.
     
  9. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ah yes, the other topic about oil that the right would rather not talk about but use as a last resort to find an excuse to pump dirty oil here, while contaminating our water. News flash; without potable drinking water, oil is as useless as .... on a .. hog. I'm for doing away with oil all together and reverting to alternate fuels. Nothing is worth going without pure drinking water.
     
  10. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm assuming you don't use, buy, or own any of the following products that are made from petroleum...

    A partial list of products made from Petroleum (144 of 6000 items)
     
  11. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,376
    Likes Received:
    91,232
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    In exchange for guaranteed oil-free drinking water, are you will to exchange your car for a horse? Are you willing to wait two days for the Maytag repairman and his donkey cart to get there instead of an hour?
     
  12. bwk

    bwk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    23,837
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    113
    >>>MOD EDIT Quoted Post and Reply Deleted<<<

    Would you prefer the short answer or the long one? How about I give you the short one; YES.
     
  13. TheTaoOfBill

    TheTaoOfBill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    13,146
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What exactly does that have to do with anything? Just because I buy oil doesn't mean I have any interest in building a pipeline for oil companies.
     
  14. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    1. 40,000 gallons is not a "massive oil spill".
    2. The damage is not "irreversible".
    3. More oil spills out of Obama's buddy Buffet's train cars than pipelines.
    4. I like how PBS ignores all the oil spilled out of train cars and blasts this story out... what a joke of a news organization. It's propaganda for "Willing Idiots" to repeat.
     
  15. 10A

    10A Chief Deplorable Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,698
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Transporting oil via rail is so much safer!

    [​IMG]
     
  16. Texsdrifter

    Texsdrifter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Messages:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    171
    Trophy Points:
    63
    My opposition to the pipeline is for that reason alone. I don't even care it's a foreign company. Stealing peoples land for profit just shows individual citizens do not own their land. We just rent it from the govt till it decides it has a better use.
     
  17. 3link

    3link Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    10,770
    Likes Received:
    4,401
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL silly libs. Who cares about drinking water? Just drink a soda instead or something.
     
  18. HTownMarine

    HTownMarine Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    8,348
    Likes Received:
    4,155
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The pipeline was 6 feet underground in 2011 when it was last checked, yet somehow, it is now uncovered and has a hole in it?

    I'm assuming we will probably never find out why it is leaking.
     
  19. publican

    publican Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2014
    Messages:
    4,872
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We've had miles of pipeline running through our nation for decades. BTW, will you be giving up your car anytime soon?

    [​IMG]
     
  20. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is the second time in the past 3-4 years and they haven't completely cleaned up the first spill.
     
  21. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are three ways to transport oil from the oil fields to the refinery; 1) by pipeline, 2) by train, or 3) by truck.

    The cheapest is by pipeline, then by train, and lastly by truck.

    And any of those methods of transportation can result in an oil spill.

    So, what exactly are you trying to say with your thread?????
     
  22. Radio Refugee

    Radio Refugee New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2008
    Messages:
    24,800
    Likes Received:
    318
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Scumbag-in-Chief and his flying monkey minions have attempted to take credit for the oil boom and lower pump prices.

    They damn well better own this spill, eh?
     
  23. Oldyoungin

    Oldyoungin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    22,629
    Likes Received:
    6,163
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One just needs to raise the requirements on these pipelines and how they are constructed. The pipeline that leaked was last serviced in the 1970's ! 40 + years ago ! Regular maintenance will increase jobs and decrease spill chances...while also taking thousands of back and forth truck visits to transport oil....which will further lead to less damage being done to our highway system because it will have less trucks on it. Win-Win.
     
  24. Iron River

    Iron River Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    7,082
    Likes Received:
    161
    Trophy Points:
    63
    There is not possible to cause "irreversible' damage to our water supply with oil. The dems have made the oil companies add some chemicals to gasoline that are hard to get out of water but crude oil can be removed from water.
     
  25. Hotdogr

    Hotdogr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    11,079
    Likes Received:
    5,299
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good to know you are in favor of trucks and trains spewing tons of C02 into the atmosphere to move that oil instead. Of course, those trucks and trains NEVER spill a drop of oil, either.
     

Share This Page