McCain: Obama Might Be Conducting ‘Massive Cover-Up’ With Libya Attack

Yeah, simple mistake....for TWO WEEKS!

The simpleton clung to an obviously patent lie for two weeks and now won't come clean about why additional security was not dispatched. They had forces less than an hour away and those cold hearted mothers sat watched in real time while four Americans died.

Where was Obama, the commander in Chief?

Just answer that , why was not life saving assistance not sent in?


wait, why do I bother....this guy is a bigger coward than Jimmy Cater who left American soldiers to rot in the desert and that's OK with Americans.....

 

Bring out the race card, what a despicable way to deflect. It is almost beyond question that Obama lied about the attacks. The only question left is why.

 

Actually it isn't beyond question. Oh I suppose it is if you listen to anonymous sources and people who get paid to bash anything Democratic give there opinions on phantom emails.

 

What makes these emails "phantom"?
The fact that you'd rather not acknowledge them?

 

Get your head out of the sand!! We KNOW now that there was no demonstration. We also KNOW that the Obama administration was referencing the video 2 weeks later. The only way you can possibly maintain your position is if you allow that they didn't know the facts for that period of time.

 

To believe that you have to believe they are inept.

I believe the president is a lying Chicago thug.

Either way he has to go in November.

 

Left is why.

Or maybe he was planning an October Surprise with Egypt's Morsi. He stripped Stevens of American security. Then Islamist radicals sent by Morsi could kidnap Stevens. Obama, after six weeks of brilliant maneuvering swaps Stevens for the "Blind Sheik". Morsi gets what he wants. Obama gets what he wants.

Left is why.

 

When, in your opinion, did that happen? When was that budget passed?

We both know the Senate has not passed a budget in nearly four years.

So I must conclude that you are uninformed, misinformed or a lying partisan hack. It is too early for me to know but I suspect you will clear that up.

 

You don't know (*)(*)(*)(*). All you know is what some talking head on the tube tells you what their "sources" tell them. Get me someone who actually matters who says Obama is responsible. Until then it is just right wing smear.

 

And McCain is probably the perfect guy to take this up.

 

Who would that be? VP Biden? LOL

 

Yeah, apparently retired and current high ranking military officials don't count.

 

Yeah, get the lying tax-cheating crazy magic underwear wearing guy who thinks that he's going to become a god with his own planet when he croaks.

 

Yeah because we can't count current and former high ranking military officials.

It's obvious but not too curious that the weasels make their little catch22 defense that works so well when defending leaders who are responsible for investigating themselves.

On the one hand, these leaders lie, obfuscate, refuse to answer questions, stifle investigations and try to brush everything under the rug and divert your attention to something else.

Then on the other hand their apologists go "hahahahha you have no evidence!"

The fact that the admin. REFUSES to investigate what happened, and no one else investigates, and fact that you or they have NO PROBLEMS with obvious questions that need answers but no one seeks them, IS the evidence.

(notwithstanding the real concrete evidence which others have managed to find despite government attempts to hide it, which you people ignore of course)

Think about it... You're the president, and four Americans died on your watch, in the country you spearheaded the reform in... It's just protestors.. Okay.. Wouldn't the president be even SOMEWHAT curious the circumstances to how they died? Were they overrun by a crowd and trampled? Firebombs? What was it?

No.. Either he didn't care, which is damming, or he did care, so he found out it was mortar fire, leaving him no reason to continue the story about the video.

That's the funny thing about this issue. It's not about politics anymore. I'm not partisan, I just see the logic. It's simple logic. The guy is either guilty of a coverup for obviously sinister reasons, or guilty of letting these people die, if not both, if not even wanting the ambassador dead and helping towards it... Based on what we know, at least SOME of that MUST be true.

There is no physical way you can assemble these facts which is in no way damming to the president in very serious ways. IN NO WAY can you arrange these facts in which the president can be excused. The magnitude of the nefarious conspiracy can be debated.. The fact that there is one, one AT LEAST as bad requiring an end to his presidency and a senate questioning under oath, cannot.

 

You can't blame the President for letting the four Americans die once the attack had actually started. What could he have done at that point to get assistance to the consulate in time to aid the American staff being attacked? This is actually a red herring that obscures the two more important facts: that security at the consulate was inadequate and that the Obama administration (at best) seriously misread the meaning of the attack for at least a week after it occurred or (at worst) tried to cover up the nature of the attack for political reasons.

 

He could have done a lot besides rehearsing his Las Vegas speech.

Obama could have dispatched armed fighter-bombers and sent in the Delta Force.

But instead he did nothing.

 

Do you have any idea how damaging it can be to the president if it turns out that he is the incompetent who let 4 Americans die without lifting a finger to help them?

And then flew off to a fundraiser in Las Vegas the next day as if nothing had happened.

 

It's sad watching McCain try to hold onto the glory days of his political career like a sports star that's pushed on a few too many seasons. He's become a caricature of himself. He's like an old man that stirs awake when there's any mention of lunch. Only with him it's military or war instead of lunch.

zzzzz.....mrmmmm...huh...Did someone say military?...was it us or them?....them?...mrrmmm...Ok, then i'll go on the record saying it's a bad decision...huh?!...what?!...let me turn up my hearing aid...oh...ooops...it was us that said it?....then I go on the record saying it was a good decision...mrmmm...zzzzzzzzz

 

McCain is only one of many who are accusing Obama of not doing his job as commander in chief.

 

$2.2 billion dollars for upgrading security and the State Dept is just sitting on it? Why? They could have easily provided the Bengazhi consulate with some real security, but didn't. For the sake of the four dead men and their families I hope the House Oversight Committee can get a handle on what really happened and why State was just sitting on the money instead of using it on what it was allocated for....additional security. Hillary Clinton really need to resign or get fired. This is all on her watch and she owns it.

There's your reason they won't blame Republicans Bill, they'd look like total idiots if they did.

 

Yeah, Obama could have jumped in with both feet like McKinley did and get us into another war. We could have gotten at least a million Libyan slaves as trophies to add to our imported workforce.

 

[video=youtube;znVqyfxfbRQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znVqyfxfbRQ[/video]