What will happen is, he will strike a plea deal and be back on the street within a year or two, mugging and raping peaceable people at gunpoint, and summarily executing anyone who gets in his way. It will be yet another failing of our judicial system to dutifully segregate violent people from peaceable society.
Just did another google search : First for "euric Cain" got this : https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=+Euric+Cain&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=jH5UVojVEYrxUqavudgO Then for "Barry Kirk" and got this : https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Barry+Kirk&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=MH5UVp_uDMKRUb-bktgG So a mass murderer gets only 3 links on the first page and an attempted murderer gets 11 links on the first page and from major news outlets.
Oh how clever, the problem is that what you're describing (deflecting to) are rare events, whereas what I'm talking about is an every day occurrence, responsible for thousands of deaths per year. There's no equivalency to be made.
*bows* Then you should be warning white people about the dangers of other whites... intra-racial murder being a far more frequent occurrence when compared to inter-racial crimes. Seems you're highlighting rare events when they suit your narrative?
Except they are not rare events. Whites are the victims of black interracial crime in 9 out of 10 instances. Tens of thousands of white women raped every year by blacks, with no rapes of black women by whites.
The utter nutcase nonsense of trying to claim that there are supposedly "no rapes of black women by whites" makes white supremacists Stormfront makes even Donald Trump green in envy in the Bigotry Sweepstakes!
I guess you'll need to contact the Justice Department, let them know their statistics are racist. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0502.pdf (Table 42) 0.0 percent of black rape victims claimed a white person was the perpetrator of the crime.
I'm sure they're just lying about this one=) Liberals LOVE the govt, until they don't. Bet he'll trust all those numbers on cop violence WITHOUT QUESTION, though. And how Bush's intel lied about the war and such. But THESE numbers.....total rubbish!!! /wink
If it would have been hate crime statistics from the same source, which is heavily biased against whites, it would have been accepted as the gospel truth.
Sure, they are. Murder - 2013 White Victim: 3,005 White Offender: 2,509 Black Offender: 409 Result: White offenders represent 84% of murders committed toward other whites, while Black offenders represent 13% toward the same demographic. White people should fear other white people. For the reasons stated above, you're using the only statistic that suits your narrative... while ignoring the much more likely scenario.
Your statistic is based on the fact that most whites spend most of their lives around other white people, and that the only reason they aren't victimized more by blacks is that they aren't around them as much. That's a pretty good argument against left-wing diversity policies. Mind if I use it?
Well, I'm sure it's probably comforting to pretend that the U.S. is some segregated utopia where no one from outside their respective races ever convene, but reality is true... and it is that most murders occur via someone you know vs. someone you don't, and to paint a picture that says the boogey black man will come to get you (and your little dog, too) is problematic... both statistically, and practically.
Races mostly are segregated. Most blacks live in the South. Most whites live in the North. Most Hispanics live in the Southwest. Even in regions where they do mix, they generally stay clustered together in certain areas of a state, certain cities, certain neighborhoods, etc. It's rare to have a truly mixed society, even in a city like Chicago, which is heavily segregated based on the part of town you are in. I'm not convinced by your argument, which is really more of an obfuscation. Just because more whites are killed by fellow whites doesn't mean whites can't be concerned about the disproportionately high level of victimization they suffer from blacks, especially when it is such a one sided affair. Next I'll be told that since heart disease and cancer kill more than blacks, I shouldn't worry about the latter.
Which would be an excellent point.... if people didn't work, shop, travel or generally convene outside of their living spaces on a day to day basis. I must say... I'm shocked. If 13% is more concerning to you than 84%, then that should tell you everything you need to know about your bias.
That's true to some extent, but even in these activities, people of the same race generally live amongst each other. Whites in most areas are going to go shopping in mostly white areas. Your statistic doesn't take Hispanics into account, but even aside from that, you're comparing apples to oranges. We're talking about the likelihood of being victimized in a random event. If some white guy gets cheated on and kills his girlfriend's lover, that's different than some guy going to the ATM one night and getting shot in the head. If a white guy kills his neighbor over a property dispute, that's different than having a group break in one night, and rape a pregnant wife before shooting her in the head. The types of murders that whites commit, aside from the random school shooting crazy, are less random, and therefore, less of a threat to the general public. Blacks are more likely to pull up next to you and kill you as part of a gang initiation. That doesn't really happen with whites.
Did you normalize your data to account for population differences? Tell me which people are statistically more dangerous.
I'll return to this soon. As promised: The persistence of the intraracial character of assault offending on the local level (paired with findings from homicide research) does not lend support to the assertion that black offenders have a propensity to select white victims for crimes of violence. On the contrary, these findings suggest that if offenders demonstrate a propensity, it is to select victims within race. and regarding the segregated living area suggestion: That the pattern persists even when local-level segregation is taken into account makes it apparent that factors beyond residential segregation operate to produce predominantly intraracial assault offending. Though causes behind the predominantly intraracial nature of violent crime remain open to and worthy of investigation, the proposition that black offenders racial animosity for white people is what drives high levels of interracial offending can be dismissed. Certainly, events of criminal violence motivated by racial hatred do occur. However, aggregate, national, city-level, and neighbor-hood-level patterns demonstrate that black (or white, Latino/a, Asian, or Native American for that matter) assault offenders do not exhibit a general propensity to select victims interracially It's a very good read that goes into greater detail than I care to. With regard to violent crime (which includes robbery and gang-related violence) it is likely intraracial first.
Yep and the majority of the threads on this forum are about a crime that someone black committed. Funny how all the sources come from CNN, ABC, CBS, etc., but let folks like you tell it they only report crime when someone white commits it.
Statistically, you'll find that murderous blacks account for less than 1% of the demographic on an annual basis.. Is .01% "more dangerous" than .001%? Sure, but I'm sure I don't have to spell out where I'm going with that. I hope.
maybe just commit less crime, that would be a solution hey... P.S. majority would mean 51% but clearly there are many threads every time a white person kills a black person, usually multiple for the same incident, that spin off into other threads about racism against black americans... if you would like to prove me wrong, just add up all the thread topics for the past calendar year and I shall issue an apology once you prove your statement... but until then its just more hyperbole to fit your agenda... I shall await your fact checking and proof...
Last I checked I have never committed one, hey. How about you take your own advice. Last I checked you have more to worry about from someone white than you do someone black.
