Very true and an interesting example. But they did try and take over half of the world when they saw the opportunity.
The latter. One time some americans tried to exercise their right to secede as stated in the Declaration of Independence, but that area of the country was invaded and laid to waste...by the U.S. Government. They burned towns, killed livestock, murdered civilians, destroyed the infrastructure...of their fellow americans. Essentially the same as carpet bombing today. Look up Sherman's march to the sea.
except for just a couple times WITH a righteous purpose. NOt like the ows or flashmob, KKK, communism, etc. and the french revolution which leftists seem so enamored with nowadays. But you go for that because it will backfire.
Yes..we straightened them out...The only nation in the world to ever use a nuclear weapon...and we used it against civilians... They claimed at the time it would save hundreds of thousands of lives because the u.s wouldn't have to invade..LMFAO..and people believe that. Think about it..an ISLAND nation...with NO natural resources...completely isolated...We had defeated their air force, their navy and their army...they had no more means to make war... All we had to do was blockade for a few weeks/months and starve them out...but no...we had a new toy to show off to the russians...
Let's apply Occam's Razor. Human greed and degrees of larceny are relatively constant across all demographics... if not poverty or culture, what explains the glaring disparity between black and white violent crime rates...or these obviously racially motivated flash mob attacks leftie national media is so quick to obfuscate?
Don Glock once again makes a good point for the wrong reasons. Flash mobs are due to the negative effects of the lingering black subculture (which derives from the rampant racism of the past where Blacks were not allowed to be part of mainstream society) and the resulting ghetto culture in various poor black neighborhoods. Where the liberals are definitely at fault is the reverse racism inherent in the non-reporting and under-reporting of flash mobs and their crimes. If DG had stuck to that point and left out all his political baggage, this thread would have had a better frame for discussion and probably a higher quality of posts.
The Left can always find its voice concerning the Klan, Jim Crow, or lynching.........flash mob assaults? Not so much. _
So, why the sudden news black out at the national level? Why the silence regarding the issue and the race of the criminals? Would reporting the KKK rallies as a "group of teens garbed in linen dept. gear" fly in the media today? _
So how much longer until they are past all that? There are more blacks in the senate, the congress, business, entertainment, law, military, governors, mayors, supreme court, councilmembers, etc... than ever before in the history of this country. Christ, the A.G. and the president are black..well..arguably so, anyway..they're mixed breeds....Look at the crime stats again. How long will that crutch be used? another 500 years? 750 years? Forever? At what point do they become responsible for themselves? America's crime rate and prison population is a reminder of the great costs of a multiracial society, where certain segments of the population's predilection for criminality means longer prison sentences and harsher consequences for them because they are simply incapable of abiding by the law.
Liberal politics drives PC speech codes and media censorship of the welfare state's failure. You can't discuss this, so you attack me. _
Japan was an imperialistic and nationalistic nation. The reasons for that approach you've just explained - no natural resources beyond those they could get from invading other nations. Hitler used the same concept to invade European countries. Whatever method was used they had to be stopped.
Nice conversation we're having. I appreciate your interest. It's very refreshing. about 2012... Well...I see the U.S. eventually collapsing..whatever the reason...and people will naturally band together along racial lines. Not because of the Trotsky smear "racism", but because of the nature of human beings. Lions like to live with lions and hyenas like to live with hyenas, for example. Neither is "better" but...they just don't get along. People will naturally segregate themselves just like they would if there were no government interference. Each segment could run their own smaller country and organize however they see fit. That way no one could blame whitey for "keepin em down" or racism or stealing their land or whatever. They can work if they want or pass out free money to each other however they choose and self determine how they live and what kind of nation they will form. Abraham Lincoln said the same thing essentially. He was a sleazy, slimy, scheming, vengeful politician and is pretty much hated in the south because we saw right through his duplicity... but he had some good ideas. "But what shall we do with the Negroes after they are free? I believe that it would be better to export them all to some fertile country with a good climate, which they could have to themselves." -- Abraham Lincoln -From, Letter to General Benjamin F. Butler March 1865 (Vol. VII) "Negro equality! Fudge!! How long, in the government of a God great enough to make and maintain this Universe, shall there continue knave to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagoguism as this?" -- Abraham Lincoln -From, Fragments: Notes for Speeches Sept. 1859 (Vol. III) "I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, (applause from audience) that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people. I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race." -- Abraham Lincoln -From, 4th Debate with Stephan A. Douglas in Illinois Sept. 1858 (Vol. III) "Judge Douglas has said to you that he has not been able to get an answer out of me to the question whether I am in favor of Negro citizenship. So far as I know, the Judge never asked me the question before. (applause from audience) He shall have no occasion to ever ask it again, for I tell him very frankly that I am not in favor of Negro citizenship. (renewed applause) If the state of Illinois has the power to grant Negroes citizenship, I shall be opposed to it. (cries of "here, here" and "good, good" from audience) That is all I have to say." -- Abraham Lincoln -From, Speech at Sringfield, Illinois June 1857 (Vol. II) "In the course of his reply, the Senator remarked that he had always considered this a government made for the white people and not for the Negroes. Why, in point of mere fact, I think so, too." -- Abraham Lincoln -From, Speech at Peoria, Illinois Oct. 1854 (Vol. II) "I think your race suffers very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffers from your presence. In a word we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason why we should at least be separated." -- Abraham Lincoln -From, Address on Colonization to a Deputation of Africans in Washington D.C. August 1862 (Vol. V) During the Civil War, Lincoln also organized the Bureau of Emigration within the Department of Interior. The sum was $600,000, a huge amount at the time and considering the tremendous war efforts. This Bureau was appropriated with the recolonization and emigration of the African slaves. Two attempts to do this were made with the actual establishment of a colony at Isle-a-Vache, in Haiti, consisting of 453 slaves transported from Virginia. Later, another attempt failed to colonize them in Colombia, South America.
Funny how when flash mobs first started it was basically white people doing it for the simple purpose of laughs and fun entertainment. They were used to bring people together and make a fun peaceful atmosphere. Then blacks took the idea and bring nothing but chaos and violence. Just like clubs here in Memphis. First it starts out as wall white clientele and it's a smooth and nice atmosphere. Then blacks take it over and the shootings begin and don't even take your girlfriend because the black males will try to be all over her and they will jump the boyfriend to get him out the way.
Really, come to Atlanta and I can take you to plenty of black clubs where there is a great atmosphere and no one is getting shot. Clubs that are 25 and older you don't see any of that useless violence.
You must be new to Atlanta.......must have missed the transition of Buckhead's nightlife from a fun, predominately white crowd to a thuggish, violent cruising seen for blacks....killed what was a great nightlife experience......