More Is Better

Approximately 300,000,000 guns is the accepted number of guns in America. I don’t know how it breaks down, or how many of those guns the government has targeted for confiscation, but 3,00,000,000 is not enough guns in civilian hands. Here’s why:

I’m pretty sure the government has the names of every member of the NRA, Gun Owners of America, gun clubs, and so on. That means the government knows where many of those 300,000,000 guns are located, while the Communists seized the opportunity to go all out for gun registration because of the school shooting in Connecticut. My point: It’s the number of guns the government does not know about from this day forward that count the most.

Incidentally, if you are not a member of the NRA, but support that organization’s efforts, I would advise you to make anonymous contributions.

Now, let me admit that I never knew Russians were so well-armed in Tsarist Russia:

Nor did I know that it was the Communists who confiscated the guns leaving the Russian people in a position of bringing a knife to a gunfight.

Notice how Soviet Communists lied just as Hussein & Company are lying today. The difference is that American Socialists prefer brainwashing over posters. Listen to a young Eric Holder:

[video=youtube;0nM0asnCXD0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nM0asnCXD0&feature=player_embedded[/video]​

Rather than believe anybody in Hussein’s administration put your trust in a few words by Andrew Napolitano:

[video=youtube;MpYTzvY1ZFs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MpYTzvY1ZFs[/video]​

 

After reading this I got to thinking about the role journalism played in the events cited in the OP:

It wasn’t long before I realized that no matter which role print press played in Tsarist Russia —— newspapers did not have the influence, or trust, our talking heads exercise, yet a majority of Americans know better than to hand over their guns to a Communist government that is afraid well-armed Americans will do the same thing to them that Communists do to everybody else.

This excerpt opens the article I linked in the OP:

I’m not certain what a comparison between our media and the one that helped bring the Communists to power in Russia means. I do know that the so-called intellectuals in Europe and in America supported the Communists.

As a matter of fact American millionaires funded a large part of the Russian Revolutions. I don’t recall ever reading what intellectuals and millionaires thought about Communists disarming the Russian people. That’s a line of inquiry historians might want to look into.

Oh well, 1 million words cannot say it as effectively as this picture:

​

 

Exactly, if the Communists were real liberators, they would not have had to force the russian people to surrender all their guns. It was all about consolidating their own power, not freedom for the people.

 

Hussein is persistent if nothing else. He started out trying to set himself as the nation’s spiritual leader. Lie after lie after lie turned that into a joke. Now, he’s back at it on the graves of 20 murdered children. It pains me to post a video of this guy since I can’t stand to look at him on TV, but you have to listen to him in this brief video to get a sense of his duplicity:

[video=youtube;oTcF17Je6Co]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTcF17Je6Co&feature=player_detailpage [/video]​

The filthy sneak is all about politics. “Stronger background checks” would make some sense if it kept guns out of the hands of criminals and the criminally insane. It won’t. What it does do is help the government identify gun purchasers. Background checks ain’t as good as registering all guns, but it accomplishes the same thing with new gun purchases. Once the government does a background check the law-abiding American is tagged as a gun owner forever. It’s a pure political move that works for the government’s agenda.

Hussein’s delusions about his own infallibility makes him think he can get around the 2nd Amendment by pretending more gun controls is about children. Concern for children is coming from a guy who heads the party of infanticide, assisted suicide, population controls, euthanasia, and death panels. Now he wants everybody to believe he cares about saving children. The only thing he cares about is trying to win the House in 2014 on the strength of gun controls. His remark about members of Congress examining their consciences prove it.

The man is really sick if he is waiting for recommendations from Biden. After the all-time baby butcher, Ted Kennedy, died, Biden inherited the title of the worst piece of Democrat excrement in the Senate. Oh yeah! By all means let’s hear from Biden.

There is a light at the end of the tunnel. It’s very far away but at least it’s there:

There isn’t much chance a Senate trial will remove Hussein. It would if Democrats took the advice of their spiritual leader and examined their consciences. Like I said, the light at the end of the tunnel is very far away if anyone expects Democrats to put the Constitution ahead of party politics.

GOP congressman threatens impeachment if Obama uses executive action for gun control
5:20 PM 01/14/2013
Caroline May

Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman threatened Monday afternoon that he would file articles of impeachment against President Barack Obama if he institutes gun control measures with an executive order.

Stockman warned that such executive orders would be “unconstitutional” and “infringe on our constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms.” (RELATED: Levin: If Obama sidesteps Congress on debt ceiling, ‘no choice’ but impeachment)

“I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment,” Stockman said in a statement.

At his press conference Monday, Obama floated the possibility of using executive action to enact policies aimed at reducing gun violence.

The freshman congressman, who served one term in Congress in the mid-1990s, further labeled the possibility “an existential threat to this nation” because, he said, the purpose of the Second Amendment is to allow the people to protect themselves from tyranny. (RELATED VIDEO — Walter Williams: People misunderstand the point of the Second Amendment)

“Any proposal to abuse executive power and infringe upon gun rights must be repelled with the stiffest legislative force possible,” he added. “Under no circumstances whatsoever may the government take any action that disarms any peaceable person — much less without due process through an executive declaration without a vote of Congress or a ruling of a court.”

He concluded by claiming that an executive order would be not just “not just an attack on the Constitution,” but also an “attack on Americans.”

“If the president is allowed to suspend constitutional rights on his own personal whims, our free republic has effectively ceased to exist,” he said.

http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/14/g...-obama-uses-executive-action-for-gun-control/