More Than 3,000 U.S. Prisoners Locked Up for Life Without Parole for Non-Violent Crim

Discussion in 'Human Rights' started by katsung47, Nov 16, 2013.

  1. katsung47

    katsung47 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,124
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    More Than 3,000 U.S. Prisoners Locked Up for Life Without Parole for Non-Violent Crimes


    November 13, 2013 |

    At about 12.40pm on 2 January 1996, Timothy Jackson took a jacket from the Maison Blanche department store in New Orleans, draped it over his arm, and walked out of the store without paying for it. When he was accosted by a security guard, Jackson said: “I just needed another jacket, man.”

    A few months later Jackson was convicted of shoplifting and sent to Angola prison in Louisiana. That was 16 years ago. Today he is still incarcerated in Angola, and will stay there for the rest of his natural life having been condemned to die in jail. All for the theft of a jacket, worth $159.

    Jackson, 53, is one of 3,281 prisoners in America serving life sentences with no chance of parole for non-violent crimes. Some, like him, were given the most extreme punishment short of execution for shoplifting; one was condemned to die in prison for siphoning petrol from a truck; another for stealing tools from a tool shed; yet another for attempting to cash a stolen cheque.

    http://www.alternet.org/print/civil...locked-life-without-parole-non-violent-crimes
     
  2. mikezila

    mikezila New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    23,299
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    if they could have learned not to steal, they would have learned it in their first 2 stays at the iron bar hotel.
     
  3. MaxxMurxx

    MaxxMurxx New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is simply totalitarian oppression, arbitrary punishment, not "justice", the mark of the totalitarian ruler. In no way it serves the advancement of the law. When people for all offenses from minor to capital crime receive the maximum penalty, then from a risk/benefit view it is better to commit capital crimes. The risk always is constant. The change is only in the possible profit. From a human perspective I cannot understand one single judge committing such a horrible "crime of justice". Those must be monsters. Hyperinflated Supernazis.
     

Share This Page