Most Americans (71%) Oppose Transgender Agenda

There are? Of course I'm not a city dweller so I may be ignorant of the ample opportunities for indecent exposure in urban life, but how is that not a crime?

 

??
There are reasons for having police beyond hunting down nude humans riding bicycles.

 

No doubt, but in most communities I've lived in indecent exposure is a crime. Not so in your naked bike utopia?

 

I am not finding a substantial point of interest in what you are saying here.

As I've pointed out, a good number of cities have naked bike events.

The attempts to tie pride parades with nudity are ridiculous. It's just one more attack on those who happen to be so oriented.

 

I didn't say anything about Pride Parades, I was talking about this naked bike riding. Now again, these are perfectly legal? You can ride your bike in front of kids totally nude and that's great? No laws are broken?

 

The reason the issue came up is because it is being used as a tactic against the LGBTQ community - even though pride parades aren't so oriented.

I don't care what you think about naked bike ride events.

 

Naked Bike rides is what you were talking about.

 

Yes. I pointed out that the concern for public nudity was entirely misplaced, and was being used as an excuse to assault LGBTQ.

If the issue were nudity, they would go after naked bike rides, public nude beaches on lakes and oceans, etc.

But, they actually just hate LGBTQ people.

Also, MTGreene seems have a close personal appreciation for dick pics shown in public.

 

Your position seems a bit ridiculous to me. You are arguing (apparently) that no one has a problem with naked bike rides, we all love them, it's only when LGBTEIEIO+ go naked bike riding, suddenly "they" have a problem with it.

Is that your position? That no one has a problem with naked bike rides unless it's a gay doing the riding?

 

I stated my position.

 

Yes, pro indecent exposure, as long as you are on a bicycle seat.

 

No, I never came anywhere close to saying that.

What I said was that there are a good number of cities that have naked bike riding events.

And, I see no indication that naked bike riding was a part of the LGBTQ celebration march in question.

The attempt to paint that event as pro-nudity was cheap, false, and reflects on the miserable idiot moralists who really need to get over themselves.

If they want to whine about naked bike riders, they can go to the events where that is the whole purpose of the event.

 

I never made any claims about LGBT being part of nude bike riding. My only point is that nude biking, in public, is indecent exposure. Any time that kids can see adult genitals that's indecent exposure. I'm not sure why you are trying to defend that. Any time you guys claim you have nothing to do with adult nudity in front of kids...there you are; defending it.

 

Would you agree that when it comes to sexualizing something and then strutting it out in public it's most likely to be done by libs and the LGBTQE-2+ people instead of cons? I've never seen conservatives dress up in dildo costumes, penis costumes or vagina costumes; they always seem to come from the same sort of people.

 

Human society has sexualized nearly everything that can be sexualized, and done it through to today in the USA.

Yet, today we are writing LAWS against people who are LGBTQ, working to make our society more divisive, working to turn people into non-people.

Given that, you ARE going to get it thrown in your face from time to time.

There are sound reasons for there being pride parades, recognizing the existence of those who are not purely hetero throughout our nation.

 

Ah yes, we must honor the most noble penis or vagina costumes.

?

 

I'm guessing that disapproval would be much lower if they could just leave children out of it

 

perfect outfits for children story hour! and if you don't agree you are a BIGOT!!!

 

Some companies do seem to be wising up.

And here is one hell of a teacher:

'This is utterly brilliant. A student accuses
@jk_rowling
of being transphobic. This teacher skilfully dissects the claim and challenges it by asking questions. He teaches not what to think, but how to think critically. Watch until the end. You see the epiphany in real-time.'

https://twitter.com/addicted2newz/s...n^s1_&ref_url=https://instapundit.com/630329/

 

The result of that conversation was that Harry Potter was probably not transphobic when taken as a single work.

So, good! She wrote something that wasn't transphobic.

However, JK Rowling has stated flat out that she is transphobic. (Has she changed her mind? I don't know.)

So, you haven't supported your claim.

 

How do you know they are not Republicans?

 

Most Americans (71%) Oppose Christian Agenda

people do not support any agenda, they want to believe as they want to believe....

that said, doesn't give anyone the right to discriminate against any religion, including Christians

nor to discriminate against the LGBTQ

 

That's exactly the approach people should take.

 

agree, good teacher and also a good student that was able to learn and see things differently using critical thinking

 

I don't care about the transgenders. I have a problem with the "agenda." I have friends and employees who are gay but they have no agenda. They simply are what they are and don't bother others about it. The problem is proselytizing the agenda.