Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Mueller's report looks bad for Obama

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MolonLabe2009, Apr 19, 2019.

Page 21 of 21
  1. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Here's a cable going all the way back to Bush. Vicky Nuland was the US ambassador to NATO at the time. https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06KIEV1706_a.html
    Wiki is really the only outlet willing to publish unflattering info about our seedy "foreign diplomacy". I have no idea why you, or anyone else would find that surprising.
     
    PrincipleInvestment, Apr 27, 2019
    #501
    chris155au likes this.
  2. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So then why didn't the media mention anything about this Wikileaks leaked cable (NOT publish it) if it shows corrupt conduct by the US government in interfering with a Ukrainian election?

    I don't find that surprising at all.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2019
    chris155au, Apr 27, 2019
    #502
  3. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How many times can I answer the question about MSM? Accept my opinion and reasoning, or formulate your own. Meddling happened. It was under reported, and lacked substance when it was covered.
     
    PrincipleInvestment, Apr 27, 2019
    #503
  4. ibobbrob

    ibobbrob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Messages:
    12,744
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obama did respond.
    Fact Check: Did The Obama Administration Respond To Election ...

    https://wamu.org/.../fact-check-did-the-obama-administration-respond-to-election-inte...

    Fact Check: Did The Obama Administration Respond To Election ...

    https://www.npr.org/.../fact-check-did-the-obama-administration-respond-to-election-in
     
    ibobbrob, Apr 27, 2019
    #504
  5. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    "Under reported." So it was reported, but why not with any mention of Wikileaks?
     
    chris155au, Apr 27, 2019
    #505
  6. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Was it reported? Link me to an MSM source you've found. I've given you my opinion on the exclusion of Wiki. Review the replies I've already given you.
     
    PrincipleInvestment, Apr 27, 2019
    #506
  7. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, don't you recall linking to a Politifact article and BBC article earlier?
     
    chris155au, Apr 27, 2019
    #507
  8. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The ones you immediately pointed out omitted Wiki right? Then you asked why I said under reported. I thought you had evidence to the contrary. My mistake. I see you have nothing to add, and I have nothing else to share.
     
    PrincipleInvestment, Apr 27, 2019
    #508
  9. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Has Obama commented on this yet?
     
    US Conservative, Apr 27, 2019
    #509
  10. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I partly agree. The part I do not agree with is about the info about Iraq.

    When Clinton believed it, I asked this of Democrats. Why not, rather than fly fighter jets over Iraq, lash out at Saddam using missiles and bombs, sanctions that are killing the public of Iraq, .... why not finish the job started by GHW Bush when he assembled all the troops needed to cure the problem then and there?

    Democrats are so bigoted and partisan they argued in favor of Clinton and later on even for Bush the son, #43.

    It was the later reports by the media there was no WMD that caused the problem. Democrats like a top spun on their axis and called GW Bush a liar.

    But this General officer was one of Saddam's trusted. He explained what happened to the WMD
    Saddam did have it. And shipped it to Syria.

    Saddam's secrets Saddam had WMD page 13.jpg
     
    Robert, Apr 27, 2019
    #510
  11. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, but I'm asking why you think they would have omitted Wikileaks, if Wikileaks was the source.
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2019
    chris155au, Apr 28, 2019
    #511
Page 21 of 21

Share This Page