@Nasa The speed of light is point to point displacement .

instead of posting anonymously on the internet, why not take your "inventions" and publish your theories? You would be hailed as the greatest scientific mind since Einstein. Even more so, since you think you've disproven Einstein, lol.

 

Advanced on Einstein to be correct !

It as taken me over a decade to gain the knowledge I needed to put it all together . Doing a scientific paper on it all is not fruitful , I would rather have a job as a consultant or similar and earn some money . Alternatively a research grant would be nice . Nobody wanted book rights .......for a fee of course .

 

Your complete lack of knowledge of mathematics would be a barrier to any kind of research grant. Then again your complete lack of knowledge about physics would be an equal barrier.

Merely dreaming up things which violate the laws of physics, presenting them as viable and then asking others to do the mathematics and the engineering really won't get you very far.....

 

Hmm, my complete lack of knowledge ? I know quite a bit of maths including my own beginning of the universe maths that explains an energy expansion and also atomic matter .

 

Yes, complete lack of knowledge. Your maths rises to the same level as your engineering - i.e. bearing no resemblance to anything anyone else would understand.

 

The N-field Theory

Abstract - The N-field theory is an united theory that unites field matter ( spatial quantum fields ) and atomic matter ( Visible objects ) into an united manifold that is independent of space , making reference to Albert Einsteins notion of space-time and Newtons absolute space . Additionally , the N-field theory explains a spontaneous creation of an Electrical Universe making reference to Dirac and Tesla .
Penultimately the N-field theory provides a set of simplicity maths to reach conclusion that the creation of the Universe is a miracle .

Extra content :

1:Explaining the nature of light

2:Explaining the mechanism of gravity

3:Explaining time

I have started my theory !

 

Oh really , so you can't understand A + B = 1

A=0.5
B=0.5

You're talking absolute garbage.

 

Your post #31 is a perfect example, an abstract with no underlying mathematics. You don't even get as far as simple arithmetic, much less the complex mathematics required to model your "theories".

 

Not in any scientifically useful way - heck not even in comprehensible English.

 

A binary energy particle is formed of two halves A + B / t = 1

You cannot understand that ? really !

 

You haven't described either half of the particle mathematically, you've merely asserted it's the case without any underlying theory or supporting experimental evidence. You're not doing theoretical science, you're barely doing science-free philosophy.

 

I think you will find atoms are binaries of -e +1e , i.e A and B . Are you that clueless you couldn't work that out on your own ?

 

Atoms are composed of protons, neutrons and electrons (well, except Hydrogen). The protons and neutrons are composed of subatomic particles - the electron is an elemental particle. Your "binary composition" makes no sense.

Quite the opposite. I'm sufficiently smart, and more importantly well educated to know that your binary composition is incompatible with basic high school physics.

 

hmm , your physics is mostly incorrect in regards to theory

(A+B/t) + A/k + B / k = >4/3πr³/t

BH binary field equation

A+B = 1

1 + A + B = 2

etc

 

Nope, it's spot on.

What is this gibberish ? What do you think it describes ? What do you think the various terms mean ? Heck, what do you think the units are ?

 

There you go , you have no idea what my maths means !

 

It appears to be a random collection of terms. There certainly seems to be no consistency in units between the terms.

What do the terms mean, what are the units ?

 

It explains a process and the rudiment of energy that powers the Universe . I call it mono pole micro bangs in reference to Dirac and particles popping into and out of existence

Monopole A divided by space k = 0

Monopole B dived by space k = 0

A + B / t = 1

A and B have to manifest simultaneously at the exact same point to form a binary energy particle


That's the brief and quantum singularity that then expands because A + B = M1 and the gravitational force attracts A / k and B/k

 

Monopole measured in what ?

Space measured in what ?

What are the units of k ?

As I suspected, it's gibberish in which the units of the terms don't even match.

 

1. Negative and positive electrostatic charges

k is space and it is infinite


Its not gibberish


A mono pole has no binary retainer so it disperses by its own repulsion , additionally these low energy micro bangs are still a higher energy state than the void space so as in thermodynamics high energy is attracted to lower state energies . Mono poles are self annihilating unless combined with an opposite polarity monopole to retain spherical form .

Q1 / k = 0Q

ok ?

where Q1 is a monopole electrostatic charge

 

One one side of the equation, the units appear to be charge (sometimes divided by unitless infinity), on the other, volume over time.

Like I said, gibberish where the units don't match.

 

The virtual particle pops into and out of existence by dispersion into an infinite volume of space .

A / k and B / k

The energy magnitude becomes negligible of either mono pole .

 

More gibberish. Not only does the maths not make sense, neither does the English.

 

A five year old can work with A and B , why can't you ?

The maths is new so it had not suppose to make sense until you've learned it like some of your maths doesn't make sense to me .

My maths tells the physical process as well as putting in simple quantity


Try it this way

(A+B) + A + B =2A.2B

or this way

(0.5 + 0.5) + 0.5 + 0.5 = 2

Later on in my theory I use A and B but this time it is for negative energy

A + B = 0

q1 + q2 =0q

-0.5q + 0.5q = 0q

It's not that difficult to learn , I am only using small numbers and A and B .

 

Now when I warned ''you'' about the N-field density increase that may send us all insane , I wasn't joking

(q1+q2 ) + (q1+q2 )^∞ = 0q

The field charge magnitude could increase to an infinite amount but we'd still only measure zero charge .

If field charge density increases to a critical level , we won't be able to move .

It will come from the core outwards , at first it will feel like pulling your feet through thick mud , then it will feel like your feet are set in concrete .