Navy releases map showing location of fleet positions during Benghazi attacks

Ok, so what did Obama do that night? Timeline please-and from an offical source. See, you're convinced he did nothing so I guess the onus is on you to provide that evidence.

 

Maybe he was smoking dope.

We don't know.

But we know the half Kenyan was not in the Situation Room trying to save American lives in Benghazi.

 

You know nothing of the kind and, as usual, your racist retort is pure conjecture. You 'know' but you don't know? How does that work?

 

The Kenyan is a lying, non-transparent scumbucket! He and The Hildebeast both should be at Gitmo, as prisoners!

Those who voted for Obama owe the country an apology! His non-constitutional incompetence is totally appalling!

 

We know he as nowhere near the action in the Situation Room.

Leon Panetta said that he didn't hear from the half Kenyan all night.

 

Dont be ridicules.

Our Ambassador was in Al Queda controlled territory on the anniversary of sept 11th, after threats and attacks had been carried out against the british embassy and the Red Cross.

Youd have to be a retard not to expect an attack.

 

isn't it funny how armchair quarterbacks have all the answers long after the game is over?

maybe what he did prevented lots of first-responders from getting killed, too

don't you think he was probably sleeping, is that a crime now?

you guys remind me of the birthers, one questions leads to another and you're never satisfied

 

With all the early warnings, why weren't prepared in advance?

 

Youre quite the bully, good work, Saul Alinsky would be so proud.

- - - Updated - - -

because that requires effort and leadership.....

 

see what i mean

your fairy tales are amusing

 

You men smoking dope or watching a stupid escapist reality show on TV prevented Obama from sending the military to save our people in Libya.

But real patriots would have gladly irked their lives in that crisis.

 

of course, all you have are fairly tales

that's really pitiful

did you learn nothing from what happened in lebanon? reagan sure did learn a hard lesson

 

I've been asking that question since the first 9/11.

 

Reagan may have learned too late that Arabs are far to backward to ever be civilized.

That's a lesion we forgot in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Marine barracks was blown up in the blink of an eye.

But if the Marines has been under attack for hours as the onus late in Libya was Reagan would not have gone to bed while they were being slaughtered.

He would have sent help.

 

you don't seem to know much about the history of civilization

casper weinberger warned reagan not to move american servicemen into lebanon

reagan didn't listen


He said one of his greatest regrets was in failing to overcome the arguments that '"Marines don't cut and run,' and 'We can't leave because we're there'" before the devastating suicide attack on the lightly armed force.

"They had no mission but to sit at the airport, which is just like sitting in a bull's-eye," Weinberger said. "I begged the president at least to pull them back and put them back on their transports as a more defensible position."

At Reagan's Side: Insiders' Recollections from Sacramento to the White House

 

See what I mean?

If our illustrious Secretary of State at the time Hillary Clinton couldn't see an attack coming after all of the above incidents, then I think she couldn't find her own ass with both hands, a GPS, a road map and a tour by Huma. How can anyone trust her to do better as President is beyond me.

 

you could say the same thing about reagan

especially since reagan was given plenty of warning

 

You're comparing apples to oranges. An armed military peace keeping force to a Consulate staff and Ambassador. To compare the two is just ridiculous.

 

i'm comparing terrorist fighting operations in the middle east

it's perfectly valid

 

Again, it was a bad idea to send the Marines to Lebanon.

But if an Arab army were attacking our guys after hey were there Reagan would not have run away and hid like Obama did.

 

that's exactly what reagan did

 

No for the reason previously given. A U.S. Military peacekeeping force is the same as a Consulate staff and Ambassador HOW?

 

they were there in service to the country, fighting terrorism in the middle east

 

Comical oversimplification. So I'll try to help you out.

The Military are Army men and they carry guns and other weapons to attack and defend.

The Army Men have guns to attack or defend an area. The Ambassador is there as diplomatic official heading his or her country's permanent mission within another country. What they do is very different from each other. If I need to explain it further feel free to ask.

 

my characterization is correct

you'd do better trying to help yourself out instead of denying reality