MNBC Falls all over itself about the ability to attack Romney. This debate was all about as Chris Mathews said..Stopping Romney.\15 debates FIFTEEN DEBATES. Now Huntsman is great..Newt is great..Paul is Great..Santorum is Great. After.. Chris spins That Huntsman is some how great because he speaks Chinese...and worked with a President Obama as some sort of unifying quality. The GOV. of N. H handed Chris his BUTT in the after debate talk...It wasn't about Huntsman serving.. it was about his endorsing the Obama Policies. Jon Huntsman is on THE RECORD supporting certain policies that the Republican party stands against. Letting China continue its money manipulation and trade policies against THIS country without a response by either Obama or Huntsman to change that policy. The whole debate was led to to attack Romney .. The People of N.H and S.C. are smarter that letting a corrupt Newt and and phony Santorum be led to greatness by MNBC. The anti Republican station is reveling in causing FIGHTING within the party...MISSION ACCOMPLISHED .. DENY A ROMNEY VICTORY. ONLY the voters will decide ..not MNBC
The MSNBC debate was pretty God awful. It turned into a campaign debate about a campaign. 20 minutes on campaign ads in a political debate? MSNBC is retarded. We should probably just pretend it didn't even happen.
Most of the debates disentegrate into discussions over trivial matters. The media can always find holes in a candidate's arguments on unimportant details.
I think the MSNBC debate format clearly demonstrated that their buddies in the current administration, are more concerned about a Obama vs Romney match up, than the Dems want to admit. Watching the post debate commentary is like watching a pack of wolves attacking a rabbit. lol I can't believe there are people that think this is objective journalism.
I disagree. I don't feel like MSNBC was getting marching orders from the White House here. I think they're just simpleminded liberals easily distracted by shiny things and actually thought it was compelling. Chris Mathews was wildly impressed with it. Meanwhile the New Hampshire voters were rolling their eyes.
Ron Paul's last point was well thought out. Rather that stating "freedom of liberty", he should have stated "the rights and freedoms outlined by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights." He should have also utilized one of the three Constitutional arguments regarding gay marriage: the full faith and credit argument, the equal protection argument, or the 10th amendment argument.
Ron Paul has several good moments in each debate..and yet MNBC wants to focus on creating a division within the party. They know Paul already has created that ..so they are looking for the NEXT GREAT CONSERVATIVE to rise to the top. Hint..Paul is already there..HUNTSMAN is NOT. Santorum will be sanitized in N.H ..and the spin is already focusing on S.C . The best deal so far today was RAND PAUL saying if MITT ROMNEY sweeps the next 2 elections that maybe it will be the time to actually start to unify behind Romney. Rand not selling out his dad..but becoming a realist..and that realization is that A ROMNEY sweep means something. Palin..Christie..Rubio..Cain..Bachman..Trump have had their chance. It would be like me saying that the Lions losing to New Orleans shows that they are or were not capable of winning the whole deal..well the fact is the VIKINGS didn't do AS GOOD ..so how can we keep spinning the fact they deserved that chance to be there by NOT being among the best. This field and all the debates is light years ahead of any democratic examination Of Obama.Did Chris Matthews get a tinging feeling running up and down his leg over the Candidate Obama's previous career of creating jobs and military service ? Did he question over and over his religious ties ? Did they focus on the policies he supported before he was president ? Did he even have any ? Now the Dem. leader from Florida says Romney has no solid character ? Well know we can see how this will be going forward. The wrong Character v. No character. Nice debate points.
