News ABC TV’s Four Corners reveals abuse of Cairns boy

Sarcasm... It is a real problem and a real sickness. It is evil and those who do this thing to children should be killed!

 

Agreed. Just be rid of them as they rear their ugly heads.

Hope the kid gets the help he needs. Crying shame to see a child put through this.

 

I know people that went through this and many are (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up for life.

 

I can only imagine....thankfully.

 

You can advocate for pedophiles and child molesters all you want.

I condemn all pedophiles, including those who molest little girls.

 

"Russia is supposedly a big hub for the illegal underage sex trade."

That is what I had heard- and lookey lookey

Reports of Russian women and children subjected to sex
trafficking both in Russia and abroad continued in 2012.
Russian citizens are reportedly victims of sex trafficking in
many countries, including in Northeast Asia, Europe, Central
Asia, and the Middle East. There were also reports of citizens of
European, African, and Central Asian countries being forced
into prostitution in Russia.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/210741.pdf

Russia is considered to be a Tier 3 country also- as you point out- the lowest ranking.

TIER 3

Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so.


If you can show how I lied about Russia, feel free to do so- otherwise I would appreciate a retraction.

 

In my opinion, there are posters who do not see any difference, morally or ethically between two adults having consensual sex- if they happen to be the same gender- and a man raping a child.

I see a very clear difference.

To me- 2 men or 2 women having consensual sex with each other is no different morally or ethically or legally with a man and a woman having consensual sex with each other.

To me- 1 man raping a 2 year old girl or a 2 year old boy is not the same morally or ethically as a man and a woman having consensual sex with each other.

Someone arguing that they would support endorse a man raping a child if the law is changed to allow it is morally and ethically wrong.

And anyone making such an argument clearly is unable to differentiate between consensual sex and rape.

Finally- I condemn all pedophilia- the very terrible case in the OP- and all other cases of child molestation- and I also include girls- who are the majority of victims.

 

I've yet to see one poster here who thinks pedophilia is OK.

I have seen a few posters try and wiggle away from homosexual pedophilia when it is homosexual pedophilia.

If the APA does in fact move toward claiming that pedophiles is yet another "orientation" then it must be given the same latitude as those who have chosen the homosexual lifestyle. Who are we to condemn an orientation. To do so would simply be orientationaphobic

 

Don't really understand your point

In my opinion, there are posters who do not see any difference, morally or ethically between two adults having consensual sex- if they happen to be the same gender- and a man raping a child.

I see a very clear difference.

To me- 2 men or 2 women having consensual sex with each other is no different morally or ethically or legally with a man and a woman having consensual sex with each other.

To me- 1 man raping a 2 year old girl or a 2 year old boy is not the same morally or ethically as a man and a woman having consensual sex with each other.

Someone arguing that they would support endorse a man raping a child if the law is changed to allow it is morally and ethically wrong.

And anyone making such an argument clearly is unable to differentiate between consensual sex and rape.

Finally- I condemn all pedophilia- the very terrible case in the OP- and all other cases of child molestation- and I also include girls- who are the majority of victims.

I think it is just sad that there are those who do not understand the difference between consensual sex and rape.

 

O, my... Again... It's tier 2, not 3 as in your dreams. Not good, but far from the top.

 

really, kindly point to a post in this thread. Now, i agree that there are a few who want to downplay and divert from the topic of homosexuals who ran a homosexual pedophilia ring, but they are agenda driven who wish to deny that homosexual sex is homosexual sex regardless of age.

Yes, intercourse by force is rape, and the action can be either homo or heterosexual, but it's still rape.

I've seen spin and attempts at derailing the thread about 2 sick, twisted and perverse homosexual men who have screwed up a little boy for the rest of his life.

 

It makes you think: How the hell does this happen? Who or what is attracted to freaking children? They're barely of adolescent age and the development speaks to that. I mean, I don't know about them pervs but I prefer it big and juicy, and that means age 18++ for me.

 

RUSSIA (Tier 3*)
Russia is a source, transit, and destination country for men,
women, and children who are subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking.

Once again- I look forward to your retraction.


Go here for the 2013 report
http://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2013/

That takes you to here
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/210741.pdf

 

I think you do not understand the difference between consensual intercourse and rape. Intercourse by force is rape. But any sex without consent is rape. Children cannot provide consent.


In my opinion, there are posters who do not see any difference, morally or ethically between two adults having consensual intercourse- if they happen to be the same gender- and a man raping a child.

I see a very clear difference.

To me- 2 men or 2 women having consensual sex with each other is no different morally or ethically or legally with a man and a woman having consensual sex with each other.

To me- 1 man raping a 2 year old girl or a 2 year old boy is not the same morally or ethically as a man and a woman having consensual intercourse with each other.

Someone arguing that they would support endorse a man raping a child if the law is changed to allow it is morally and ethically wrong.

And anyone making such an argument clearly is unable to differentiate between consensual sex and rape.

Finally- I condemn all pedophilia- the very terrible case in the OP- and all other cases of child molestation- and I also include girls- who are the majority of victims.

I think it is just sad that there are those who do not understand the difference between consensual sex and rape.

 

hmm, I believe I have said that. In any event, the topic is about 2 vile, sick and demented homosexual perverts who bought a little boy for their sexual pleasure. Please feel free to discuss the topic

 

I have repeatedly- you keep veering off into other topics.

I condemn these monsters along with all child molesters- I also condemn child molesters who molest girls, who make up the majority of child sex abuse victims.

 

awesome. I wonder why we've heard nothing from friends and family? How could they not have suspected anything? Or, are they complicit in this homosexual pedophilia ring?

 

I would speculate that the family that ended up with custody of the boy is not saying anything to protect the boy. And I would suspect that the rest don't want to be associated with these American pedophiles.

 

He has banned gays from adopting - like these two subhuman wastes did in the OP article. But I'm sure it will still be Putin's fault anyway.

 

How does that stop child predators?

 

You are right, I apologize. It looks like I was looking on previous report. Interesting anyway.

 

I just thought of Russia because I had heard of something fairly recently- I do not in anyway believe that Russia is the only bad example out there.

 

Homophobes love to exploit pedophilia, as if there weren't already enough lowlife exploitation, both hetero- and homo-, there already.

 

Of course this has nothing to do with this thread- but certainly I believe that is true. In my opinion, it is very clear that there are those who are opposed to homosexuality who use the issue of pedophilia as a tool to encourage discrimination against homosexuals.

I am convinced of this just by looking at the threads started here at PF- virtually every thread about some horrible child molestation case that is started here on PF is about boys who were molested by men. I am convinced that these threads are started simply so the posters can use the expression "homosexual pedophile" with a wink and a nod.

Meanwhile- even though girls are the majority of child molestation victims- virtually no threads are started because a girl is molested by a man. I rarely start threads, but I believe I may be the only one who has started any threads regarding the child molesters who abuse girls. The abuse of girls is ignored because that doesn't further the anti-homosexual agenda.

Again this of course has nothing to do with this thread- I am just responding to your general comment.

 

What an ironic statement of non-fact considering the following comment from the SAME author in the SAME post which plainly states that to have been adopted by a heterosexual couple instead of a homosexual couple, the child would have had NO risk of parental sexual abuse.