NJ: Man sues after officers allegedly shot, paralyzed him while he retrieved ice tea from car

NO it does not have to be a specific crime. It can be vague, yet criminal in nature; https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/reasonable suspicion

You should tell us all about what it was like when you were a police officer and arrested people, so we won't confuse you with some internet person who is full of opinions and no actual experience or knowledge of the law.

 

Stop making things up, it's looking quite silly.

 

Lol did you read what you posted?
an objectively justifiable suspicion that is based on specific facts or circumstances and that justifies stopping and sometimes searching (as by frisking) a person thought to be involved in criminal activity at the time

what specific facts or circumstances indicated he was involved in criminal activity?

 

Lol wtf is a general crime and how does not doing anything illegal indicate one?

 

Are you just not in the mood to read or do any legal research before asking hilarious questions?

TRENTON - A Burlington City man was shot four times by a police officer while trying to flee a traffic stop here, a court record claims.

The shooting occurred after a police detective broke the driver's-side window of a car driven by Jajuan Henderson, and the 29-year-old allegedly struck two cars while attempting to leave the scene, says an account based on video from an officer's body-worn camera.

Henderson previously had refused to cooperate with police and at one point allegedly reached under the seats of his vehicle, says the account, which is in a probable cause statement for charges against him.

The incident occurred around 12:10 a.m. Saturday when four detectives with the Street Crimes Unit stopped Henderson's vehicle on the 500 block of Centre Street.

The statement identifies the officers only by their initials.

Henderson, who was alone in his vehicle, appeared to be using a cell phone at the time of the traffic stop, the statement says.

At that point, another detective tried to break the driver's window, succeeding after numerous attempts, in an effort to place Henderson under arrest, the account continues.

"Henderson started the vehicle, placed it in drive, and attempted to flee the scene," the statement alleges. It says Henderson struck vehicles that were parked in front of and behind his car "while officers remained in close proximity."

The police received a call about suspicious activity, I'm really glad you're not a police officer because you clearly can't understand the law no matter who here quotes it to you.

 

Earlier accounts say there was no traffic stop and he was sitting in his car and someone claimed he was suspicious. I’ve said a dozen times if it was a traffic stop then that changes it.

 

There it is. The time to argue whether it was a good arrest or not needs to be made in court, not on the street. He did it to himself.

 

And that’s what he’s planning to do it sounds like. I still haven’t heard what crime they suspected him of to justify them demanding anything from him. Although for the 40th time, if he was driving that changes it.

 

You mean the guys who turned in their body cam footage that the report states?
Yeah, they are cops. lol

Thugs in black clothes and ski mask?
Cool story bro

Was that when the car magically started up, was put in gear, and rammed the police car behind him?

Let us know when you come back to planet earth.

 

And what part of you have no clue about what you're talking about is sinking in.
How many times have I shown you the DMV has proved your driving theory wrong yet you continue to babble the same ole garbage.

 

Geez again with the driving nonsense? Am I being trolled or are you having trouble following what I’m saying??

 

Cool story bro. Can you link us all their badge numbers / names?
Can you post this is normal police procedure when asking for an ID?
Can you source they asked for an ID?

You go and prove me wrong.

The assault by the thugs happened before that.
That's why everything that happened after that, is all their fault.

 

Just as soon as you can link us to your fake made up claim of ski masked thugs attacked the driver.

 

You're the one hung up on it

 

Lol because you keep going back to if he was driving. One page 1 it says he wasn’t, so that’s what I’m going by.

 

You're lying, again.

 

Really, I keep going back to the driving claim?

Now you don't even know what you posted?
Thats pretty funny

 

Lol ok it’s all me. I keep bringing it up. Does that mean we can stop now?

 

It's the victims claim that is not disputed with any evidence. You must be aware of that.
The thugs or so called cops and you are not able to dispute this for over a month.... and that's your problem right there and not mine.
And they could have done that with ease, since a cop would have taped it.
Which leaves me to believe that we're not dealing with cops, but thugs.

So it's safe to say the victim got it right with the masks.
While you're just wildly assuming whatever that fits a white cops narrative best on a black victim Jim Crow style.

 

Nobody claimed they were masked.
And the media already interviewed the detective who investigated the shooting and they have his affidavit.
You're just doing what you usually do.
Making s*** up

 

I don't know, can you?

 

Sure. Now can you tell me what reasonable suspicion of a crime they had to demand his ID while sitting in public?

 

You're still just making things up, why?

 

I can't wait for the body cam footage. Another "Sovereign Citizen" perhaps?

 

Some stories say a vehicle stop, others say he was just sitting. Not sure why that’s been unclear.