No Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower on 911

You will NEVER explain again how no amateur or professional filmed a boeing with markings on 911 because it's not possible to explain. You work from a position of assumption, only. All the plane video recording of the event was laughably altered and rendered nothing but black blobs with missing wings and numerous other impossibilites.

BLACK BLOBS!!!!

It's no wonder why you can't exist outside of a few forums.

 

Dude! Seriously? You just showed us a United aircraft with a visible logo on the vertical stabilizer.

Go get some sleep and look at it again.

 

did he just debunk himself?...

 

you do know that there is a major news media video out there that you can hear not a jet but the sound of a missile approaching, (rocket propelled), and there is no crunch, just a double nearly simultaneous explosion.

when metal hits metal it goes CRUNCH, well unless its all hollywood then you never know how it will sound.,

its another one that missed the censors knife LOL

 

Got video with really good audeo of a two-car collision? Throw it up here with some of the 9/11 impact videos and soud waves graphs for comparison.

 

If you see him carryig a petard, find someplace else to be.

 

The best evidence for no plane (NO SOUND) approach is the guy looking up before the second tower. The goofy afro guy shot that.

 

"THEY, THEY BLEW THAT BUILDING UP". "AIN'T NOTHING HIT THAT BUILDING, NOTHING HIT THAT BUILDING". "IT BLEW UP JUST LIKE THAT".


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJSc83NwBx4

 

And yet no documentation of why they said that....typical troofer.

 

If he was recorded where that video was made, he would not have had a chance to hear or see the plane approaching.

You got squat, as usual.

 

another major fiziks (*)(*)(*)(*)up on yer part LMAO

Id say dont quit your day job but LOL

 

What are you talking about? Do you have some proof that the witness could see through buildings? Your last post can only be described as "delusional."

 

LANDING GEAR WAS PLANTED BY GOVERNMENT RETARDS

Was 9/11 landing gear hidden on purpose?

"The odds of it entering that space at exactly that angle that would permit it to squeeze in there ... it had to come in at almost precisely the right angle," a police spokesman told The New York Times. Investigators are considering the possibility that it was deliberately stuck in the spot, CNN reports.

"We are also looking into a possibility it was lowered by a rope," said NYPD commissioner Raymond Kelly, who noted that some rope seemed to be wrapped up in the landing gear.

 

Ther only people who would have had a motive to pant it would be someone who did not want the new Muslim community center built. That proves nothing about the attacks.

 

Flight 175 was a grey and blue plane. The first pic here looks blue at the top but is against a blue sky which matches the fake plane image. I think the fake image was supposed to be a photograph. It's visibly shorter than what it had to be, but the green building and blue sky prove that it had no markings or windows if one wants to believe it was a real plane, which any honest researcher would reject and accept as a poorly done fake. The right wing is angled way too far to the rear and the engines are clearly not aligned compared to real boeings. The left engine also sags.

 

Dude, you just keep debunking yourself. The logo is visible behind the right wing tip The left engine is where it is supposed to be, with the left wing down slightly. The windows are visible as a smudged dark line below as lighter line,

You are fooling yourself and nobody else.

 

You REALLY need to get your eyesight checked,seven....

Just saying...

 

so this is an attempt to do what another poster does?

remove all intelligence and default to dumb and dumber?

few people in the western world do not know what a auto collision sounds like.

not talking about your modified fakes, talking about originals that slipped through the censors and I have no intention of linking them.

 

Nothing is visible on the fake image. And you simply ignore that the parts of the fake plane don't match real boeings. And of course you cannot compare them side by side. You just lie and pretend they match when all people can see that they don't.

 

but the first news casts are usually pictorially the most accurate



as you can see its the invasion of the shadow people.

and the wings of their shadow craft are forward swept!

well when you can see them at all! LOL

 

Please make a gif file of this one. You know I did lots of work with these and jfk vids. I don't know who this is credited to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evuM2eZdkPA

 

its already up there, its a signature fake LOL

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ejse8w&s=5

 

When only the crazies remain, it's time to look elsewhere for real conversation. Enjoy the asylum, my friends.

h

 

quit whining,

there has been plenty of opportunity to seriously address issues but troughers choose to heckle instead.

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...-tower-collapse-new-demolition-euphemism.html

and

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/293132-5-videos-put-therm-te-argument-bed.html

now their scripts no longer work.

simple come up with new "believeable" scripts.

 

This is exactly the type of failed 911 stupidity that the common man will identify with. It moves right of the wires, left of the crane, and finally right of the wires again before it melds into the tower. Classic fakery right here that awaits the eyeballs of potential billions.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evuM2eZdkPA