No-planers: I challenge you to explain how all the videos and photos....

Explain it then!!! He tried thinking I would just believe it because there was a machine that appeared to make metal disappear. Explain it. Stop pretending physics is some mystical thing I would not understand.

 

Apples and oranges. Most plane crashes happen at slower speeds, usually during landing or in the case of the Egypt flight which was already blown apart where parts would fall more at terminal speed rather than top speed.

An aircraft coming in at landing speed will be going much slower than one going full bore into a building. The force is not linear. For instance, an aircraft crashing at 500 mph will exert 4 times more force than one crashing at 250.

 

That doesn't explain the process it took for titanium, aluminum and steel to disintegrate.

 

Then explain why you are not incredulous because in the links you provided also show burnt/disintegrated aluminum?

 

So you can't then, okay Hoosier. That just it, my pictures show the material burnt, melted, charred and in existence. Not just gone like Shanksville or the Pentagon.

 

Really? You can still see the roof in this picture. Your personal incredulity does not negate simple physics no matter how hard you try.

 

If you can't explain how the planes disappeared into what looked like a couple garbage bags ripped open and set on fire or how a whole plane fit into a small hole the size of one of the engine's then you need not waste anymore of my time because you have been exposed.

 

That would take a few things. First actual facts instead of bizarre opinions. Second, an understanding of physics. Third, and understanding of aircraft design and capabilities. Without any of that you will never understand or accept anything other than what your imagination tells you.

 

prove it then!!!!!!!!! Stop pretending to know some mystical information. Prove I won't understand. You know why you won't because you can't!! Otherwise it is just your opinions

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2316922/Plane-crashes-near-LA-Pilot-killed-3-injured-mid-air-collision-small-airplanes.html

http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&source=android-browser&hl=en-US&q=jet+crashes+into+mountains#imgrc=saw_dZIce-pmLM%3A

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2015/10/31/Egypt-air-traffic-control-loses-contact-with-plane-.html

http://onpoint.wbur.org/2015/03/30/germanwings-crash-pilot-mental-health-flight-safety-alps

 

Proving something to someone that has no understanding of those things would be like trying to explain an iPhone to a caveman. They won't understand even when you do prove it.

 

There is a world of difference between soil types in Pennsylvania coal country and the swamps of the everglades. I know that, and my bet is that you do too.

 

You can get closer to something more realistic with the Germanwings crash. Yet that was on an incline at a slower speed and no fire compared to the head on crashes at much greater speeds and more fuel load.

 

No need to understand airplanes and aviation as long as you have a government press release to explain it to you. LOL

 

You have been exposed for the agent you are. Give the queen my regards!

 

No need to understand airplanes and aviation as long as you have conspiracy fantasies to explain it to you. LOL

 

Dude you are fake and have been exposed attacking my character only proves how bad you lost. Try bowing out with some dignity.

 

Typical dismissal of anything relevant to your questions which is par for the course for conspiracy theorists. Facts are not important. One cannot have a rational discussion with an irrational conspiracy theorist.

 

You haven't produced a fact. You can't even explain how the plane disintegrated. Produce some "facts" then that should be easy for you since the "government defines facts" you should have millions of them that proves the planes disintegrated.

Trying to turn around your defeat on me is useless, your failure to produce any factual evidence has been proven by your posts over the last few pages of the thread. Your delusions of proving anything are just that. Delusions. It is common among the programmed people. They often have these delusions of actually doing something because they could call someone a conspiracy theorist. You and I will always know the truth though won't we?

 

Sorry you have no background in physics or aircraft but it shows.

 

typical response from someone that can't explain the "facts" just keep proving your ignorance for the rest of the p.f. posters

 

Yep, the rest don't agree with you so it never occurs to you that you are wrong. BTW, you should try and provide some 'facts' other than personal incredulity. So far you have been fact free.

 

Nice red herring,I didn't Cpmpare the two sites to each other,just noted the results of the crash were the same

 

*beating head on desktop* Are you for real?saying the plane 'disintegrated',is just a figure of speech,NOT the process used

 

Here is what facts look like for those that pretend to know what they are talking about. This is why they continue to refuse to explain the exact process it took to make two planes disintegrate in to dust. Because it is physically impossible under the condition's those planes were in. The bones they supposedly identified the DNA from was reduced to ash at a mere 1292°F. DNA testing 2001 barely had the capability of identifying criminals but government agents would have you believe they could do the impossible.