nukes and 9/11

Discussion in '9/11' started by sharik, Feb 12, 2018.

  1. sharik

    sharik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,543
    Likes Received:
    118
    Trophy Points:
    63
    read somewhere that workers they got to clean the debris have been later on taken ill with oncology related diseases; could it be nukes used to cause the towers collapse?
     
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    157
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The idea that there were nukes in the towers was probably started by a public-relations company paid by the government to try to discredit the truth movement.

    Here's a video with a disinfo agent misrepresenting the truth movement by assuming that truthers believe the no-plane theory and then showing the no-plane theory to be false.


    The trouble is that truthers already know it's false. Real truthers don't believe in the no-plane theory.


    Start watching this one at the 7:20 time mark.
    provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents



    Here's some serious investigation by real truthers.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...orted-9-11-terrorists.456423/#post-1066183060

    Neither the nukes theory nor the no-plane theory is mentioned anywhere.


    This explains the cancer cases.
    https://www.9news.com.au/9stories/2...d-rise-by-millions-due-to-toxic-asbestos-dust
    (excerpt)
    --------------------------------
    Hidden in the dust was more than 400,000 kilograms of asbestos, mercury, fibreglass and benzene.
    ---------------------------------
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The problem is the destruction of the twin towers was so unique that it invites all sorts of theories. Dr. Judy Wood calls it "dustification" and I'm hard pressed to dispute that description. In her case, she believes it was done using some new form of energy weapon. Others believe only nukes could have created such an effect. I personally have no idea what mechanism was used but sure as hell, planes, fire, damage or any combination could not possible turn the majority of those towers into fine particles that blanketed lower Manhattan.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    2,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The claims about asbestos are specious. Office fires burning, even with the damage caused by the airplanes, could not have caused all the damage observed. There is a reason the FEMA photographer Sonnenfeld was declared Persona non Grata. His pictures revealed that the official story is impossible.

    The nuclear theory is the only theory that explains all observed facts.
     
  5. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    157
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I'm no expert but wouldn't conventional explosives and thermite explain all observed facts? Show us a fact that could only be explained by nukes.


    Start watching this at the 2:40:21 time mark.

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)


    ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 911 TRUTH (full unreleased version)


    These analyses were done by sincere experts and they don't mention any nukes.
     
  6. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I assume meaning the complete destruction of the 3 towers, at least in the manner they were destroyed. That would be impossible,

    Before theorizing what could explain it, it would be best to first scientifically prove the NIST theories are impossible. Once that's a given, all plausible theories must be analyzed given the facts and known evidence. Then each has to be scientifically eliminated until only those remain that make sense. For me, there is only one possibility left if planes, damage and/or fire (natural) could not have been the cause, that is controlled demolition (man made). In other words, it's either a natural total destruction or it's not natural (i.e. man made) there is no third possibility.
     
  7. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    2,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IMO the damage done to hundreds of vehicles, the strangely burned conditions cannot be explained by thermite or conventional high explosives. Also, 90 days worth of molten iron could have been caused only by nuclear. So too the presence of many chemical substances that can be caused only by nuclear. And the radiation sickness prevalent in all the GZ workers. Not to mention the seismographic records. Hot spots visible from space for days or weeks. Air as noxious as the mouth of an industrial incinerator.
     
  8. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    2,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm just a country boy Bob, and I don't need some expert to tell me that what I saw at WTC, especially thanks to the photos taken by Sonnenfeld, was not natural.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  9. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed. However, I'm a big proponent of proving it scientifically. If it's settled peer reviewed science that the official claims are impossible, the only valid argument is that the investigation and its conclusion are worthless. Then it's up to the US government to show its true colors, as it usually does.

    I read other forums. The NIST/official narrative defenders are saying Dr. Hulsey failed to account for parts of WTC7. So without saying so, they're creating an excuse for rejecting Hulsey's study. The problem is Hulsey's work will be peer reviewed and if there is an issue, it will be exposed on peer review and up for correction. Everyone and anyone can participate over a 6 week period as far as I understand the agenda, even those at NIST who worked on the WTC7 project and even the NIST/official narrative defenders. All will get a chance to do what NIST didn't allow others to do on their project because key portions were closed to the public (e.g. the NIST models, critical data, etc.).
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  10. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    2,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nearly 17 years on, those still defending the official story are either utterly ignorant of the facts, or they have a stake somehow in defending the fantasy. They are not to be taken seriously IMO.
     
  11. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Those who spend nearly every single day defending the official narrative are not ignorant of the facts because they read the facts from those who dispute it. They just have a standard excuse for every single one of the hundreds of nearly impossible anomalies that all had to occur on the same day to make the narrative work. The rest (OCT supporters who post once in a while) knee jerk dismiss any question or contradiction as "conspiracy theory", even the science. Then once in a while there is the "I was there, you weren't" type who believes having been there somehow means the official story is correct. The problem is many who were there dispute the official narrative.
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2018
    Eleuthera likes this.
  12. saltydancin

    saltydancin Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2017
    Messages:
    704
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Why would the Federal Lynching churchstate of hate even consider they're in a one legged butt kicking contest with themselves that a new testament rewrite of the burning bush would be some "man is God" burning Bush's oilgarchy still killing Americans in school shootings program from all those immaculate drug conceptions in order to protect & serve Arab terrorists prior to 9/11.
     
  13. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,615
    Likes Received:
    2,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nice imagery and language, but whatever your message might be completely eluded me.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,165
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then it really isn't "nice", it's utterly confusing.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  15. saltydancin

    saltydancin Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2017
    Messages:
    704
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Looks as if the only 9/11 nuke has been the nuclear chain reaction where school shootings have replaced suicidal Islam airplane hijackers, but then again like the churchstate trained business of not stopping Arab terrorists that threatened POTUS & to nuke Temple Mount is utterly & uncanny in similarity to thieving US Constitution arsonists Rehnquist dismissed with an immaculate drug conception.
     

Share This Page