Obama signs order to further disarm Americans

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by Wolverine, Mar 17, 2014.

  1. Logician0311

    Logician0311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,677
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    And this is all Obama's fault for
    a) threatening to ban guns at some point (though I don't recall him saying that), and
    b) placing sanctions against Russia (which some conservatives are now saying we should nuke, despite having worshiped their leader as recently as a few weeks ago).

    How does this make sense?
     
  2. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,711
    Likes Received:
    3,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Regular Joe

    Regular Joe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I make no apologies for impatience now!
    WHO paraded children on MSM to plead the case for gun control?
    WHO brought in Eric Holder?
    Never mind. I'm sick in my soul about his lengthening list of infringements and acts of treason. If you don't know by now, you are incapable of learning.
     
  4. Logician0311

    Logician0311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,677
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    That's amusing. You're saying it's an "infringement" or "treason" for Obama to present the issue of children being killed as an emotional one, and ignore that the pro-gun side is using emotion to make people believe the government is coming for their guns... :roflol:
     
  5. Wolverine

    Wolverine New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    16,105
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, I do not.
     
  6. Regular Joe

    Regular Joe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I tire of this exchange.
    I hold that a rational, sober individual understands the principles that our society was founded upon, and bases a large part of his faith in mankind on his allegiance to those principles. To engage in this manner of ignorant meandering is not to my liking.
    It has taken civilization this long to advance to the point where we established our system of governance. It provides the social opportunities to further advance in the true purpose of earthly existence. That purpose is for every human being to attain spiritual maturity.
    I would like very much to believe that any man who aspires to the office of public service at any level would be engaged in a project that is similar to that which Benjamin Franklin set for himself, which is the disciplined pursuit of virtue. We have the means and the ability to guide our affairs in that manner.
    I say that I am sick in my soul because I see that this is not happening, and it is not even a consideration in our selection of the most powerful office on earth. There are many ways in which our President could influence the People of this Nation to keep our society moving in the direction to nurture every person to abide in our single purpose for being here. This is not happening, and this person who currently holds the office of President is reversing much of the progress that was made in the past.
    I will not pursue this discussion any further.
     
  7. Logician0311

    Logician0311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,677
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    That's because you have nothing rational to contribute.

    Careful, according to your previous post, emotional hyperbole is an "infringement" or "treason".:roflol:

    - - - Updated - - -

    Then you do not believe in the free market as it relates to the very basic concepts of supply and demand...
    Interesting.
     
  8. Injeun

    Injeun Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    13,016
    Likes Received:
    6,077
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Isn't this a ban on all Russian stuff?
     
  9. Wolverine

    Wolverine New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    16,105
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Find ten bricks of .22's, and we will go your way.
     
  10. LivingNDixie

    LivingNDixie New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2013
    Messages:
    3,688
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So the OP states this is disarming Americans, then states he knows it isn't true. Only truthful statement was about panic buying. That is true and a testament to activist gunners and their conspiracy theory political beliefs.

    The US free market doesn't mean you have an entitlement to ammo. If you want ammo buy, but don't act like it is entitlement when you don't like the prices.
     
  11. Small Town Guy

    Small Town Guy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    4,294
    Likes Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You made fine points and you are learning like everyone else about how the antis ignore facts. Good posts though and keep in mind that none of what the ignorant antis are arguing for has any merit with the majority.
     
  12. Regular Joe

    Regular Joe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Thank you, Small Town Guy.
    There is a limited cadre' of MEN here who would have paid to attend a full lecture by Ralph Waldo Emerson, and had half a clue what he was talking about.
    The world will do as it will, but this small list of individuals will retain their discernment between party line and timeless truth. We know who we are. You can't merely "believe" or suspect that you comprehend truth. You know, or you do not, and it is obvious which camp you inhabit.
     
  13. Logician0311

    Logician0311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,677
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    "The majority"?! That's amusing.
     
  14. Logician0311

    Logician0311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,677
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Well said.
     
  15. stjames1_53

    stjames1_53 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    12,736
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    0
    well, put. Funny how the American extremist anti-gunners at some point will advocate using guns to take ours away. Isn't that a bit contradictory. They are so close to calling for the slaughter of Americans just because they are so terrorized by the notion that a living gun is soooooooooo far away from them. Most of the time they are so silly, I copy and paste their replies and send them to my 2nd A buddies..
    They demonstrate their insanity by insisting my gun, which could be as far as a thousand miles away, will show up at their door to destroy the fabric of their unicorn world..............
     
  16. Logician0311

    Logician0311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,677
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Who did that?

    Based on what?

    ...says the guy who believes he needs a gun to protect himself from the mythical armed "bad guys" who are going to invade his home at any minute.
     

Share This Page