Hey, you are the one arguing with that which you call immaturity, I guess you are_______________ A. Insecure. B. Immature yourself. C. Completely oblivious to the fact that your "intelligent discourse" was already disproved. D. Blinded by bias. E. Lack the understanding of "drinking the Kool-Aid" F. A minion. G. A good and servile subject. H. A person who lacks knowledge. J. A subject with a singular point to make in a complex equation. Support immaturity.....errr no, reject ignorance heck yeah!
Z. All of the above. Anyone here reminded of the true religious zealot, who after hammering everyone with his religiosity, and find himself mocked and ignored by everyone, amazingly concludes that clearly he is simply more holy than everyone else.... but it couldn't possibly be that his conversational abilities are comparable to an ape.
Arguing with? Not so dear boy. I've been encouraging the fellow. It obviously makes no sense to be restricted to immature comment. Can pro-gunners make rational comment? Yes of course they can. Please stop pretending otherwise
Gentlemen, gentlemen, while he raises some good points, he is a one dimensional thinker. He lacks the imagination to extrapolate multiple conclusions for his theory. He is anything but a religious zealot, because he doesn't believe in souls since he cannot offer up a mathematical equation to define one. I am not mocking him for this, his theory just wont float. It is simple. One can build a boat out of paper clips. If it doesn't float, you just need more paper clips. He sounds dedicated, but he is still incorrect with his conclusion. A boat built out of paper clips just wont float. And if you engage him long enough, two things become very clear. One: He desires to make the whole world responsible for his own personal safety, something he needs to be responsible for, Two: It is all about him because he is terrified of a gun 4000 mi. away from his home.
Yes arguing...your posts provide quite the evidence. Pretending umm no. Class dismissed! - - - Updated - - - One dimensional, why I see shades of Daniel here eh?