Occupier: "I wouldn't give a **** if 9/11 happend 911 more times"

Hopefully they'd all be his family members since he probably has around 2.5 million cousins anyways.

 

Are you really suggesting that people who refuse to work pay INCOME taxes? That is the stat you are trying to quote 47% of the folks out there pay no income taxes, isn't it? You do realize one would need to work to pay income taxes?

Them babies and bed bound seniors are a bunch of leeches you're right.

Oh and just in the interests of disclosure I am also a member of the 53% who pay income taxes.

 

How does that excuse their behavior?

And that poll I cited is the only poll ever done on the Flea Party so we have nothing else to go on but their own words and actions.

The difference is for every instance of violence by a tea party member which I can count on one hand there are nearly 100 acts of violence by the Flea Party. They aren't even close to being comparable.

No just far exceeds any other group when it comes to protesting.

Yes there are crazy people in every movement. The difference is how many more are in the movements on your side. Literally hundreds more. It cannot be a comparison when the ratio is at least 100:1 and I'm being very generous with those numbers when you compare the Flea Party to the Tea Party.

 

No, 47% of Americans pay no, Zero, Nada, Zilch federal income tax.

 

But they work, and that's kinda the point. If people don't work of course they pay ZERO income tax no one should be indignant about that, they had 0 income so of course they have 0 income tax liability.

 

Psst... what they pay in, they get back.

So the answer is still ZERO!

Just to clarify, I do realize a part of that 47% work, but very few to none of the flea baggers work

 

So what exactly is your female dog? People that don't work should not and do not pay income taxes. People that make very little income over the course of a year do not pay income taxes, is that your beef you think those making under 100 dollars in a year should pay? If not under 100, what about under 1000? Under 10K? Should the amount they pay be a token amount so as not to unnecessarily burden someone that is already poor? Demanding all the 47% pay at a certain point is just spiteful, as some of those folks are blood from a stone poor. Not to mention that EVERYONE who earns income already pays payroll taxes, while the very wealthy pay a less and less percentage of pay roll taxes with every dollar they earn above 110K (give/take for single). As long as we're really being sincere in talking fairness in taxation.

 

...LOL...a 1% defending liberal politics?!?!?...



Kabuki Joe

 

No no, he serves the 1%'er his coffee.