One of Trump's last tweets before election might be the most disturbing?

For someone whining about wasting his time on me, you sure are replying to my posts over and over. I must be living rent free in your head today.

I live in a racially diverse neighborhood. I don't have a problem with people who don't look like me or my relations. They don't scare me like they obviously scare Trumpsters.

 

And Polosi said that it doesn't matter what the vote count is, Biden will be President. So explain to me what she means by that? Are the Democrats planning a coup? Isn't that treason?

Besides that, Biden is compromised by China, and wouldn't that be treason as well?

 

Only violence scares, especially when it's against your person, your family and against your business and job.

 

Didn't Obama do the same thing?

How can conservatives who want to retain the status quo be ideologues? Wouldn't that be an oxymoron?

The more representatives there are, the less say and power a representative's vote has, so it's only normal for the current representatives not to want to add more. If someone does, then it would be for their own political expediency.

 

Slander and calumny is never upsetting to those who have no moral values since it's part of their make up. But it is very upsetting to those with integrity. So much so, that at one time they were challenged to a dual for doing so. But that was during an era when virtue and honor was paramount.

 

If the Dems did do this, future Republicans would be able to appoint justices to the expanded court too. That's why this is ultimately a stupid idea. We'll still have the same debate over the Supreme Court in the future, it will just be for the increased number of seats on it. Lets say they expand it to 15(arbitrary number). We'll argue about who gets the majority 8 of those 15. They'll be the same arguments we're having now.

 

Ohh no no names .. got cha

 

Can you provide that quote in full context, please?

 

Agreed, so why is the right so focused on fearmongering in their messaging? Why does Trump keep going on and on about having "saved the suburbs?" That's one example from recent speeches.

 

Obama did what? Scalia died and Obama nominated a qualified (and very centrist) replacement, in February of an election year. McConnell flatly refused to give him a hearing because, he said, it was an election year. But now, while people are already voting, it's okay to ram through a judge who belings to a very far right religious cult? Sorry, your attempt at whataboutism is laughable.

 

It was Democrats who loaded Biden's team up with lawyers, etc and making these suggestions even possible. To then blame Trump for something that was perpetuated before hand, is absolutely laughable. If you really believed in the strength of the Republic, such talk would have been unheeded.

In four years, the 'resistance' has failed to show greater discipline, greater 'unity' or to even remotely adhere to the messages they proclaim. It's like listening to a preacher who drinks booze and sleeps with a billion women/men.

 

9 justices since 1869.

 

Hm, funny how we didn't have 9 in 2016 then, and we had plenty of GOP members telling us that there was nothing sacred about the number 9 and it was fine to have 8 instead.

 

Gangs and crazies armed with weapons of war

 

Where?

 

Gangs and crazy people are everywhere, are they not?

 

In your imagination

 

So where do you think they are?

 

Only to be sold back to the US for some huge favor. lol

 

O'Kreep is a CONVICTED FELON with ZERO credibility.

 

He’s undefeated in his court cases ,, I would be careful he sues everybody and wins, wins wins lol

 

Some homework for you (it took me three seconds to find this and a few more to browse it):

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/institution.aspx#:~:text=The number of Justices on,an average of 16 years.

"The number of Justices on the Supreme Court changed six times before settling at the present total of nine in 1869. Since the formation of the Court in 1790, there have been only 17 Chief Justices* and 103 Associate Justices, with Justices serving for an average of 16 years."

 

O'Kreep took a PLEA deal so that he didn't end up doing any jail time and with that on his RECORD it is UNLIKELY that he would win many lawsuits.

As far as court cases goes he is definitely a LOSER in some of those too.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/08/james-o-keefe-settlement-acorn

https://www.aft.org/press-release/f...-okeefes-attempt-dodge-accountability-illegal

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...es-frivolous-lawsuit-against-project-veritas/

Sorry

 

No where near a million dollars the rapist bill Clinton paid Paula