Oregon teacher tells colleagues they'll be fired if they don't 'come to the light' and become 'anti-

And given the fact that black males are so incredibly prolific with their violent crime, they should be racially profiled anyway.

If we can institute policy that is explicitly discriminatory against whites... explain to me why we can’t institute a policy that is explicitly discriminatory against blacks to address their absurdly high rate of violent crime.

Either it is acceptable to discriminate against someone based upon race or it is not. Which is it?

 

and you, by your own words, base it on the color of skin.

 

Yet another FEEBLE attempt to justify the odious RACIST behaviour of the cops.

How many VIDEOS have been posted of white Karen's making FALSE REPORTS against blacks?

FACTS matter!

 

That’s correct but please let’s not pretend that my concerns are not justified by a cornucopia of statistical fact that supports my position. Moreover let’s not pretend that the lefts entire platform is not predicated upon fighting “white privilege”.

As I’ve said before I have no problem with equality. I also don’t have a problem with inequality. But if you think that inequality is just going to be allowed to be placed on the necks of white people and no one else, you’re going to get push back from me.

 

Facts do matter. So tell me, what are the statistical facts for how many false reports against blacks there are a year?

 

Judging an entire race is never justified.

 

So whites aren’t to blame for slavery then? And whites today are not to blame for discrimination and racism that occurred and they had nothing to do with it? More importantly whites and blacks should be treated EXACTLY the same under government policy?

Be careful on that last one because you and I both know you don’t believe that.

 

No, whites are not to blame for slavery, all races kept slaves over time. God even condoned it in the Bible.
And no, whites today are not to blame for discrimination and racism that occurred and they had nothing.
And everyone should be treated EXACTLY the same under government policy.

 

Really? So then let’s do this one more time.

Is it okay to have a government policy where you give money to one group of people and exclude another group of people from those funds based solely on the color of their skin?

 

When there is overwhelming proof that one group was discriminated against by the government, yes.

As long as the government does it for any group with overwhelming proof they discriminated against by the government, then everyone is being treated the same.

 

Bingo. Our nation was founded around the concept of equality.

 

are you saying black people are not allowed to name their kids Jake or Scott?

 

I am saying that when a fast majority of pupils who are black / colored people don't identify themselves with typical white Christian names used in the curriculum than teachers should adjust the curriculum.

And probably to this extend, the teacher in the OP want other teachers fired if they refuse to comply and stick to their old views.
I do admit, it's hard to find an example what this teacher must mean with "old views" when we're not part of that school and do not know what is going on.
But when this the direction of what it is....I do fail to see a problem in this.

 

No they’re not LOL that’s absurd. According to your argument the government could make a policy that says anyone who hires a white person when there is a black person available to hire even if they’re not as qualified will be fined $100,000 per day the white man is employed.

And that’s not discrimination? You are advocating for discrimination to fix discrimination. So now white people can come back and show they were EXPLICITLY discriminated against based on the color of their skin.

You’re not against discrimination based upon race. You’re against discrimination based upon race when it doesn’t fit your ideological perspective. Which makes you JUST AS MUCH of a racist as the people whom you claim to despise so much.

 

who is 'they', there are bad white people and bad black people, neither represents all of a race

we call em out when we see them regardless of race

 

Not at all. This has nothing to do with any business or anything outside of the Government. In my opinion any private business should be free to discriminate all the like.

It is not discrimination. Once again, if a company says "we have been paying women under 5'2" less than everyone else so we are going to give all women under 5'2" $10,000" that is not discrimination against everyone else.

So, this week I sent my son $2500 to replaces stolen tools and climbing equipment. I did not send my daughter any money, did I discriminate against my daughter?

No matter how many times you repeat this, it will still be a lie.

 

But that’s not the same thing and you KNOW it.

A more appropriate comparison would be the company stating, “yes we know that our pay now is equal, but because we discriminated against women 60 years ago, now we’re going to pay all women an extra $10,000 more a year than all the men.”

Even though those women didn’t face that discrimination and those men, who now make $10,000 less than all the women because of their sex, didn’t have anything to do with it.

 

talking about the white teachers not being able to change their melanin was wrong of her, she lost me at that point

it would be just as wrong of a white teacher to say this to black teachers, I would call both out

 

A more appropriate comparison would be the company stating, “yes we know that our pay now is equal, but because we discriminated against women 20 years ago, now we’re going to give all women an extra $10,000 one time bonus".

 

Wrong these programs have no expiration. There is nothing which says they’re going to end. In fact, they keep GROWING in funding.

But even if it didn’t the definition of discrimination is the prejudicial treatment of individuals based upon a collective concept such as race or sex. And no matter how you want to attempt to justify it, giving a group of women something they didn’t earn and they didn’t suffer through while not providing that same benefit to men who didn’t cause the original suffering is the very epitome of the definition of discrimination.

And giving a group of blacks, who didn’t experience the discrimination, money while excluding whites, who had nothing to do with the original prejudice, IS the epitome of discrimination based upon race.

You’re just attempting to couch it in verbiage which you think justifies that discrimination.

 

Well, **** I guess I did discriminate against my daughter then! I hope she can forgive me.

I should also point out that none of the money the government is handing out to the farmers did they "earn" anymore than any other recipient of wealth distribution earn.

 

That’s correct. None of them earned it and in fact none of them deserve it. However, if you’re going to give it to one group you cannot exclude another group based solely on their race and claim you’re not discriminating. That’s preposterous

 

Huh? The teacher got a problem with old views. You need to read the article in the OP again.

 

Everybody gets 99% of what is being given, that 1% is being given to correct past illegal behavior I am not going to have an issue with no matter how many times you make these claims.

I have no problem with the government correcting past illegal behavior

 

that is not what I got from it, if there is a teacher being racist, that needs to be addressed, but she mentioned them not being able to change their white skin color to black, that is not appropriate