Pa. Dems lose a state senator: John Yudichak of Luzerne County declares himself independent...

Zero Republicans and two Democrats voted against the impeachment inquisition, making the impeachment inquisition partisan.

 

Democrats and independents voted for the investigation.
I can post the definition of bipartisan if it would help you?

 

Republicans control both houses of the state legislature which has far too many members and are grossly overpaid for doing nothing but run the state into the ground.They do nothing to attract new industry to the state or put our state highways into the 21st. century,most are antiquated country roads that are rotting in place along with our bridges.

 

Hopefully they (The democrats) lose more seats so we can restore order back to the United States government. Our country would be better off today with a government working closely together to solve issues of the American people instead of ripping it apart with fake investigations and Russian Hoax nonsense.

 

Independents? One independent voted for the inquisition.

Two Democrats voted with Republicans in voting "no" for the inquisition.

 

Correct, two parties voted for the investigation to proceed.
Making it a bipartisan one.

You should take your own advice.

 

The impeachment inquisition is a political partisan hack job.

 

False, at minimum it is a bipartisan one — that just fact — the rest is just your opinion.
Congress will get to decide on both impeachment as well as removal; then the public will get to vote on if they agree with the decisions made.

 

False. The only bipartisan movement we have seen was democrats voting against impeachment.

 

Exactly.

 

So the Independent Party is no longer recognized by trump supporters?

Sorry, I have trouble navigating all the shifting goal posts.

 

Nice spin but you failed again.

 

Yet you are unable to answer a simple question. Here is another you can dodge; if a member from two separate parties vote on legislation, is that legislation considered bipartisan?

Simple yes/no question since the previous one was too tricky.

 

False, the impeachment inquisition is a political partisan hack job.

 

You are straying off topic once again.

The impeachment process is not bipartisan, it is a Democrat politically motivated hit job on the POTUS.

 

Did the Independent vote for or against?
Is that member part of a second party (not a Democrat)?

Y’all are literally arguing against the definition of a word.

 

I accept your concession that it is a bipartisan investigation.
Cheers

 

Love it. Political parties are evil. All of them are bad for America.

 

Which means you just lost because you never backed up your allegation with any facts. lol

 

A-****ing-men

Our founders said that political party would be what destroys this nation.
I wish they would have set more safeguards to prevent them.

 

me too. There would be no democrats in office trying to destroy the country. Like they tried when they started the Civil War.

and lost.... lol

 

I personally don’t think they should be able to give any candidate money or any financial support. I don’t mind fundraising, but I also think there should be a cap on how much you’re allowed to spend any race say like 300,000. Right there are you eliminate special interest from dominating politics.

I’m curious when did all the southern slave owning Democrats move to New York and California?

 

They did?

 

Which fact would you like me to back up, there are three in this instance.

First, we have the definition of the word bipartisan relating to, or involving members of two parties [source]
Second, we have the fact that the one can be a registered independent [see op for an example]
Third, we have that a member of the aforementioned voted for the investigation alongside another party [source]

Let me know which one you are struggling with and we can dive deeper!

 

Well that’s the large portion of the party you claim started the civil war.