Pedophile Principal Arrested

I have no problem with individuals discriminating. Its the governments discrimination in marriage which continues to exclude couples not permitted to marry while gay couples are free to do so.

We dont know which couples are fertile. We do know that all who are will exclusively be heterosexual couples. Encouraging heterosexual couples to marry reduces the number of single mothers on their own with absent or even unknown fathers, and increases the # of children with the benefit of both their mother and father in the home. Encouraging ANY other type of couple does not.

 

Tell that to the APA who tries to argue all the homosexual pedophiles arent homosexual but instead have a Pedophile sexual orientation. Neither homosexual or heterosexual, even though they are exclusively attracted to males.

 

that is where it appears to be heading. We see it in this subsection where it's argued that male/male sex is not homosexual sex if one of the males is a child.

I have never seen you or others state that male/female sex is anything but heterosexual sex

 

but I use your reasoning......and you shoot yourself in the foot.
Homosexuality is a matter of grooming and programming. Take a child and let it be reared as a lemming, and it learns to act like a lemming because it only has one given thought provided by the environment.
Gays deliberately target the young to encourage them to become perverse

 

And yet, NO definition of homosexuality has EVER contained this age limitation. It was only when confronted with the over representation of gays among child molesters that this age limitation is being added.

 

I think the Sambia tribe and others like them demonstrate that anybody can be groomed to be a homosexual.
http://lrivera0327.tripod.com/

 

This has been repeatedly debunked.

 

There is no rational or legal reason same sex couples shouldn't marry. That's why laws banning them keep getting struck down. Other types of marriage has no relevance in many way to the legal issue offstage sex marriage.

Procreation is irrelevant to who can marry

- - - Updated - - -

Provide a single scientific study that supports this retarded statement.

 

this thread is about a homosexual pedophile. Did you post about homosexual marriage in the wrong thread?

 

There is no over representation.

- - - Updated - - -

No it isn't.

I responded to someone else's post about same sex marriage and corrected him

 

He has to keep lying or he has nothing. Guess we'll have to post this again.

http://www.politicalforum.com/gay-lesbian-rights/352658-gays-threat-our-children.html

 

by the definition of the term???????I guess heterosexual has a new meaning now...what lib gay handbook did you pull that one out of?

 

umm

excerpt from the article

About 10 p.m. that day, Larkin entered the boy's room, began to rub his leg and put his hands down the boy's pants, the arrest report shows. The teen told Larkin he wanted him to stop, and Larkin left the room, according to the Sheriff's Office.

male on male is thus homosexual

 

Go ahead and tell me what percent of child molesters are homosexuals, and what percent of Americans as a whole are homosexual. Then get back with me. The math is simple. The numbers don't lie, but liberals sure do!

 

Nope

.......

 

Their sexual orientation would be either homo, hetero, or bisexual.

You think just because a man molested a boy he is homosexual. This is your willful ignorance, likely because you don't really grasp the concept of sexual orientation, worse you willfully reject knowledge to kling to your backward canards. I would venture this is some loyalty to a political affiliation.

Pedophiles don't necessarily molest children because they are attracted to them.

Sexual assault is not always motivated by arousal. You have a lot to learn.

You really ought to understand the basics of psychology before you blindly blunder through theories.

 

This has been done for you several times now. All the answers you need. Here it is again. Now read and try to comprehend what you read:

http://www.politicalforum.com/gay-lesbian-rights/352658-gays-threat-our-children.html

 

Tell that to the APA who tries to argue all the homosexual pedophiles arent homosexual but instead have a Pedophile sexual orientation.

No, I think if a man identifies himself as a homosexual, he is a homosexual, regardless of what the APA would rather classify him as in order to reduce the stigma of homosexuality.

 

http://lrivera0327.tripod.com/

 

Their sexual orientation would be either homo, hetero, or bisexual.

So you would tell the most accredited association who gets input from the most educated people in their field to cram it so you can increase the stigma on homosexuality?

Dixon I am sorry, but you are dead wrong about it. The APA studies human behavior, you don't seem to at all. You are just so desperate to label sex offenders as homosexual so you can keep painting homosexuals negatively.

If the argument is that the APA is wrong, show some credible sources that show that.

 

Yeah, every gay person in the United states was a member of that tribe.

We didn't raise children like that here yet they can still turn out gay. Explain it.

 

girly men within their circle of friends/family
momma's boys (being coddled)
pushed around by stronger kids
exposure to homosexuals
fondled by another male

there are many reasons and stimuli which would make one choose the homosexual lifestyle

 

I knew no "girly men" I was not at all coddled by my mother. I was always the tallest strongest boy in my class. I was never exposed to homosexuals. I was never fondled byanother male.

This hypothesis has been debunked. Why would you cling to it?

Prove any stimuli have any effect on it.

 

without being able to perform psychoanalysis on you and get to the bottom of why you chose the homosexual life, then it's speculation

Naturally, I would never be able to prove that you were "born homosexual" because there is no MEDICAL proof to that theory

 

Uneducated speculation.

Medicine wouldn't really be able to prove a genetic hypothesis (not really a theory).

Medicine is for healing sick people. Genealogy is for proving genetic causes of things.

Why would medicine prove a genetic hypothesis? That it's like astronomy proving a biological hypothesis.