pedophiles going public

So does appalling ignorance and arrogance.

 

To quote your own words again...only in your own head is that happening.

 

Your abject failure to actually comprehend the discussion is not the problem of "leftists".

 

Ironic given that you appear to be thoroughly confused about both the judicial branch and the term dictatorial.

 

Insanity?

No

But if I agree with even one ruling by the supreme court does that condemn the American people to absolute subservience to every crazy thing liberals think up

In the case of interracial marriiage there nothing physically different or unnatural to mixing different races

Whether you accept that God created humans or they evolved through dumb luck we all have a common origin

Clearly men and women need each other to reproduce and that is the purpose of the two sexes

But men having sex with men s unnatural and society does not have to alliw same sexes to marry

And would not except for the autocratic lib judges

 

Recall is better

 

Since, by your own admission, homosexuals can't reproduce then heterosexuals, like you and your ilk, should just stop having homosexual children, right?

So why do you keep on having homosexual children if you want to deny them the same rights that you enjoy?

Why do you and your ilk hate your own children so much, given by your admission above, that every homosexual must have had a heterosexual mother and father?

 

You mean the homosexual birth defect that has never been proven to exist

Homosexuals are messed up people by choice or circumstance

but that behavour should be discouraged rather than embraced

 

Sez you

The unelected lib judges are smug little dictators

 

now that is truly a twisted false view of reality.

I guess EQUAL RIGHTS are only for straight white folks like yourself. that is what the courts decided wrt to both homosexuality and same sex marriage. Did you miss the part where all laws of the land are tested against their constitutionality?

Pedophiles exploit VICTIMS and can cause long lasting damage to those victims. Can you spot the unequal rights in that? Granted its a tad nuanced for some.

 

So you and your ilk are entirely responsible for "messing up" people "by choice or circumstance" and then you and your ilk get to blame the victims and deny them the same rights that you enjoy even though you and your ilk were responsible for "messing them up" in the first place?

And then you blame judges for treating those people you and your ilk "messed up" as the equals of you and your ilk?

If anything is "messed up" it is that kind of thinking by you and your ilk.

 

No its a statement of exactly how I feel about perverts who prey on children. now if I caught somebody in the act and I had a gun, I wouldn't hesitate to put one in the back of their head. But, perverts don't usually act out in public, and I don't own a gun. I guess I'd have to settle with simply stomping on their nuts until they were the consistency and color of strawberry jam.

I am truly bigoted against pedophiles. I don't care about any of the "justifications" used by some as to the perverts motivations to act. I don't care if they were molested themselves or have a disease or have a "hardwire" problem. Removal from the gene pool is to me the optimum solution.

 

CAUSE AND EFFECT is not correlation and I dont give a crap if you don't want to read another study that clearly outlines the damage that NAMBLA types inflict on children.
.

As for your strawman, I suggest you shove that one where the sun don't shine.

 

Man that is some sick shyte.

 

Straight white folks?

What are you?

A homosexual black guy?

Bummer

And Inthink you missed the part about libral judges making up constitutional rights to give homisexuals something by decree that they did not have polular support for

 

There's a point in there that I made. It's that just because you believe something, doesn't make it fact.

 

WTH? That isn't flamebaiting. At all. Asking you what you consider a 'tough question' isn't flamebait. Cripes.

 

Pedophiles become known to the world when they act, not when they think. I'm not sure why your post is germane to my point, as my point used the characterization "often".

 

Of course I am using our morality to judge the past. People do it every day. That doesn't make it incorrect - or you wouldn't be able to claim that slavery was wrong, merely because it was an historical event.

Your example didn't qualify age at all. It painted with a broad brush, and in doing so, provides cover for pedophilia even by historical measure. Only now are you defining more exactly what you meant.

 

So sex for recreation is deviant. Got it.

All you're doing is providing additional examples of the weird conclusions that one can draw from being a moral relativist.

That's why I used the term 'right and wrong'. Morality means nothing if breezes can alter them, btw. Right and Wrong are absolute.

Disagreeing with that is the very definition of a Moral Relativist.

That's not the point I was making, and that's why MaquisCat was forced to provide context after I responded. There is a difference between what you're describing, and examples of pedophilia - even by historic context.

 

You've responded to nearly every post by saying nothing to contest the content. We already know you disagree, it isn't interesting to hear that you do 7 different ways.

What's useful is a substantive argument. Be useful.

 

Are you ready - now - to cede that the banned poster is a pedophile?

 

Again.

Forum readers, Derideo_Te cannot figure out that there are pro-pedo posts in this thread.

That depth of delusion can't be dented.

 

So you believe that equal rights are only granted thru popular support of a majority? You must have failed civics since its obvious you totally misunderstand your own consitution.

BTW, I was right wasn't I? you are a straight white guy.

 

Yes, you missed my post where I acknowledged I was wrong. although infrequent, I am ALWAYS willing to admit when I'm wrong. Not of opinion, but of fact and this is one of those cases.