What a vapid response. Did it not occur to you that your point is asinine when you typed it? Faked? There is no point discussing the subject with an argument of such stunted logic, but here goes 1). Prove the evidence was faked, you have the burden here as it is you who claims it was faked. Where is your evidence? 2). There is no 'lack' of physical evidence, there is a plethora of physical evidence that you choose to ignore. This is called 'cherry-picking' and it is logically fallacious. 3). There is plenty of proof that the hijackers existed. Only crank sites state otherwise and their arguments have been disproved repeatedly. The ball is in your court truther. Show me some actual evidence for your claims, not just specious maths.