Plane or No Plane?

Discussion in '9/11' started by Hunter Rose, Aug 15, 2011.

  1. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh come on now, you know I wasn't talking about the deceaseds family members.

    You Ozians are finding it harder and harder to derail, so you go off in some bizaar direction hoping to get some traction...sheesh.

    Maybe it's time for your handlers to bring in the "A" team:razz:
     
  3. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    8,330
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's what we were talking about.

    Who's the one trying to derail?
     
  4. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There may have been some people killed in the towers. The numbers have been greatly exaggerated though, in order to keep the propaganda rolling.

    No victioms on any planes - because there weren't any.

    NO PLANES at WTC
    NO PLANES at the Pentagon
    NO PLANES in Shanksville

    Thanks for completely derailing my thread. Debunkers are unable to even look at the basic facts.
     
  5. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NO, that is what you were trying to talk about, in an attempt to derail.
     
  6. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sorry dude, I wasn't trying to derail.

    I am not going to discount the possibility that something outside of high explosives knocked down those buildings, and the possibilty that someone or something altered the videos of that day.

    It just doesn't make any sense to watch those vidoes and disregard the aircraft strikes and not disregard other parts of the video.

    I think we can agree that those buildings were brought down intentionally, to me the question is who?

    We find out who, and we will know why.
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,924
    Likes Received:
    979
    Trophy Points:
    113

    NO FIRES EITHER!

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Exactly.
    NO PLANES.
    no need.
     
  9. chillyrooster

    chillyrooster New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i agree with the no plane theory because not one ground reporter or ground witness saw or even heard a plane only on a screen monitor or on the phone by an actor or tv employee
     
  10. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh lord.......
     
  11. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you seriously saying we do not have death certificates or any of those other things for victims of 9/11? Idiotic. Plainly idiotic and ridiculous.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_September_11_attacks#cite_note-52
    http://articles.cnn.com/2005-02-22/...technology-dna-testing-diane-horning?_s=PM:US

    There are hundreds of Workers' Compensation death claims in NY for 9/11, among 45,000 NY Workers' Compensation claims relating to death, injury, and cleanup-related occupational diseases from 9/11.
    http://www.workerscompinsider.com/archives/001116.html

    It is plainly moronic to say there aren't death certificates or other evidence of deaths from 9/11.
     
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,924
    Likes Received:
    979
    Trophy Points:
    113

    yup and hezerkoni has a gag order LOL
     
  13. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can you produce any of them? Your links are to TeeVee sights (already proven complicit) and to workman's comps for the cleanup.

    Let's make it easy. One live eyewitness who saw a plane strike the tower. Let him or her testify.

    I copied this paragraph from your link

    Which mean of 3000 supposed deaths, only around 1500 could be found or identified. Why is that? Sounds like infalting the numbers to me.
     
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As if 1500 weren't enough deaths for the lunatic'no planers'?
     
  15. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would appreciate if every one of your responses didn't include an insult.
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I insulted the idea of 'no planes', not you.
    And are you THAT thin skinned?......you have to KNOW the sort of reaction that would result from your views
     
  17. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Some of us would appreciate it if your theory wasn't such an insult to one's intelligence.

    It's about the dumbest 9/11 theory I've personally encountered, which, considering some of the competition it has, is saying something.
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Y'all got that right...
     
  19. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL... So you have no salient response, so you resort to attacks.

    Predictable insane nonsense from you as usual.
    They're a matter of public record, so yes, I can. But why should I do all the legwork for lazy 9/11 Deniers who've already shown me, over ten years, that they will not accept any actual evidence no matter how compelling, unless it confirms their delusion.
    Well, if you get NYS eCase access (to Workers' Comp claims system), I can give you the ECF numbers and you can review them yourself. Or, if you have Westlaw access.
    There are thousands of them recounting what they witnessed. Their accounts are all over the internet. People wrote freakin books about it.

    Again, as I've said... No matter what we provide, you will dismiss it, because you're not interested in truth, you're interested in maintaining your ridiculous delusion.
    Because a gigantic building fell on top of them. Duh.
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Agreed. I'm not shocked however that the regular 'truthers' are embracing this insanity.
     
  21. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I really hope the OP is just trolling with this particular theory, because it's so ridiculous that I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt..:lol:
     
  22. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nah...you're just comfortable this one won't get legs, but, just in case...you'll beat it down a little more.
     
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The 'no planes' argument is based on fantasy. Talk about disinformation.
     
  24. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The whole "official" BS story is weak fantasy, supported by the weak minded and the paid employees.
     
  25. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    8,330
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your story is the perfect illustration of the denial of reality. Your assertions are assumptions, not proven claims.

    When presented video of a plane crashing into a building you assume that the video was faked (somehow).

    When presented with testimony that conflicts with your view you assume the witness is lying.

    When presented with plane debris you assume that it was planted.

    When presented with family members that lost loved ones, you assume that they are lying.

    When presented with scientific data that conflicts with your view, you assume the scientists that generated it were lying.

    When presented with argument that conflicts with your view you assume the poster was paid.

    You're going to have to come to terms with this at some point in your life. If you don't you're going to get so paranoid that you lose touch with reality all together.
     

Share This Page