POLL: How to respond to the Tunisia and France terrorism?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-33287978

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-33284937

Two deadly Muslim Acts of Terror (MAT) today.

The Civilized World must not stand still and allow the Iranian Terrorists to develop nukes, cos just think what they would do with nukes?!

Also the Iranians finance and train Hamas, and we must not tolerate this either.

I propose a two pronged attack
1) take out the Iranian nukes
2) take out Hamas and Islamic State in Gaza

 

CIA? Holding all the aces but always with the penny-ante stakes. Sigh.

"If you're gonna play the game, boy,
You gotta learn to play it right."
- The Gambler​

 

This is an excellent thread. The OP post in particular is fantastic.

In sad times such as these, we must assess who the key Islamic Threats are.

Our number 1 threat and target is Iran and its nukes... we must also weaken Iranian Terror Influence (ITI) by killing off Hamas Terrorists and those Terrorist Lovers (TLs) who voted them in. Our best ally to achieve this is Israel. We should advise Israel to flatten Gaza in order to kill the terrorists, Whilst they do that, we the Americans can flatten Iranian Terrorists,

 

In Tunisia they are closing the mosques which don't accept to be controlled by authorities, in Italy our intelligence and anti terrorism control mosques and Islamic centers ...

This is the right strategy: to force Muslims to understand that we are no more "welcoming" ...

And if I have to think to a retaliation ... Hamas is still main personal main target.

 

how come none of the poll options actually address the ISIS terrorists in France and Tunisia?

folks in Iran and Gaza had nothing to do with these attacks and blaiming them is absurd and illogical.

especially since ISIS are Sunni radicals, who hate Shia and Iran is Shia. Iran is fighting ISIS in Iraq.

 

oh God!!!
ISIS which US made terrorist group (and it's ally like Saudi ) do terrorist attacks and Iran should accept responsibility!?!

 

Iran is fighting ISIS every day.

linking the two, is absurd and silly.

 

You're right, but Hamas is always Hamas! There would be a kind of historical satisfaction in breaking their asses ...

 

that's nice, but there is no link to Hamas and these attacks.

suggesting a link, is absurd.

as for a link with Iran? lolol!!!

Sunnis hate Shia

 

Excellent reply. Iran may not have done this particular IslamoTerror but my point is that they have Islamic Nukes Of Terror. We must finish the Iranian Terrorists off before they use their nukes.

 

Be patient ... the Ayatollahs are the second main target ...

 

You remind me Condoleezza Rice at the White House after 9/11, a part of the administration wanted to attack Iraq. She was among who commented ... "WTF? Why Iraq? We have to attack Al Qaeda in Afghanistan! Why Iraq?"

Would you vote Condy for President?

 

Condy was right, Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. And our invasion of Iraq created ISIS

 

I look forward to the day when Israel flattens Hamas and ISIS in Gaza and the USA flattens the Iranian IslamoNuke Terrorists.

The, and only then, will the world be a safer place.

Iranian Nuclear Terrorists will nuke the entire East and West Coast, making what the Tunisian IslamoTerrorist did to the Europeans seem like a wasp bite. We need to stop Iran, if necessary we should defend ourselves with our patriotic nuclear capability.

 

luckily we are too intelligent to fall for such fear-mongering, again.

Bush's lies about WMDs in Iraq, changed everything.

 

Iran is developing Nukes of Islamic Terror. (NITs). We must terminate those Iranians and their NITs.

 

even Israel says they aren't developing nukes.

its all just right-wing fear-mongering, similar to the lies about WMDs in Iraq.

 

So ... Condy for President!

 

* we let them deal with their own crap and focus on our own.

 

The attacks were done by ISIS, who are sunnis, yet you want to use that to go after iran, who are Shiite? You must be one of those like were in the Bush Admin, the ones who attacked those who were not doing the attacking, and then kissing the hand of those that financed it.

Unbelievable.

 

I would vote for condy, but I also would have voted for Colin Powell. I think Powell would have been a president along Eisenhower lines. Condy would be the next best thing.

 

Actually I think it is up to France and Tunisia as to what action they take for the attacks. I wouldn't be against supporting either France or Tunisia covertly if needed. But the face of any retaliation in my point of view has to be that of France and Tunisia. Not us.

 

She could be the "surprise" of next Republican primary elections, so far she has kept her decision not to run for the Presidency.

 

Iran is a problem which will solve itself. There is a strong resistance movement among the youth of Iran, and those under 30 comprise most of the population. The ayatollahs will be out of power this generation without doubt.

 

The Civilized World, led by the USA and Israel, needs to defend itself from Muslim Terrorists upping their attacks. The biggest threat are the Iranian Terrorists, since they have nukes. Iran directly supports Assad, who has chemicals and Hamas, who have Missiles of Islamic Destruction (MIDs). By taking out Iran, we will weaken Hamas, which is a bonus.

If we nuke Iran's nukes, collateral damage is likely to be very small. This is because most Iranians support their Terror Government so these Iranians will not count as collateral.

The USA and Israel will NOT allow Islamic Terror to be victorious.