Keep in mind, in the general election the challenger's numbers typically go up as more people start paying attention. [video=youtube_share;Jp5bfxpchAY]http://youtu.be/Jp5bfxpchAY[/video]
I know a guy with a Neutered CAT that leads Obama by 10 pts. That doesn't mean he'll ever get inside the White House as President.
Paul does great in the polls unfortunately his supporters are lackluster when it comes to turning out to actually vote.
In cannot see Obama losing to anyone which is a shame as he is an ass. Does not who wins anyway as America will not change at all. Ron Paul has good foreign policy but is a bit of a Nazi otherwise.
Wow, the most pro-freedom candidate anyone will ever have the opportunity to vote for, and you think he's a nazi. Unbelievable.
Actually under Paul's vision you would become subject to whatever the State demanded. He would strip power from the Federal government. When asked if he'd allow a State to institute Jim Crow laws again he simply said, "No State would ever do that." He never said he'd intervene. For those of you without a strong background in history I will tell you this. Some States have a very poor record on respecting individual freedoms. But according to Paul that is the way it should work. I won't vote for him because he was one of only a few Congressmen that voted against the Amber Alert bill, which to date has saved the lives of over 500 children. They would be dead today if Paul had been President. He is a dangerous man.
The Rasmussen poll shows that in a general election matchup, Ron Paul edges out Obama by 1 percentage point, 44 to 43 percent. Ron Paul has been polling well against Obama consistently and the recent polls are indicative of the Obama campaign's weakness ahead of the general election. The poll also finds that this far into Obama’s first term, 40 percent of voters respond that they “strongly disapprove” and 27 percent “strongly approve” of his performance.
Meanwhile,the people you support put into place the NDAA and are doing whatever they can to pass an internet censorship bill. They are also the same people who have caused the death of tens of thousands of children in other places in the world, but, because they voted to put into place a sign system that could have just as easily been funded and operated by private non-profits, that makes them "good" people. The centralization of power in Washington, and the central planning of money, health, energy, and eventually anything else they can get full control of is dangerous for individual liberty. If Ron Paul is a dangerous man, it's only to those who believe in fascism and further centralization of power and imperial dominance over the world. To the rest of us, he's the only sane choice for president.
Now that Santorum has thrown in the towel, people can concentrate on the issue of Romney vs the guy with the horrible record.
How exactly is he "a bit of a Nazi?" He wants less government control than everyone else in the race on either side of the aisle? You get the most freedom with Ron Paul. That's what his whole appeal is. Is freedom nazism now? And I'm not even a Ron Paul fan. In fact, I think his foreign policy sucks precisely because it's too hands off.
They are all the same (whatever label you use) because they work for the same establishment aka elite ruling in top of system. Their focus is on the youth and military. They repeat everything since 9/11 that happened in European history over the past few thousands years, especially what happened in Germany (via terror, economics, psywar, youth, military they took over Germany, try the same again) They repeat the same history since 9/11 in the EU and USA. If the establishment's mass media aka MSM is baffled they cannot see clear who they want as their next president, they have left three options for the voter, Obama, Romney, Paul. They play their 'game' with the voter, the television watching masses. Three presidential candidates each for on the three largests ethnical groups, hispanics, whites and blacks. One one their professors have warned years ago that the USA could split up into three ethnical groups (this looks like foreknowledge), and in the other way they can choose to use 'multiculturalism' (or samenheid/sameness) They use 'race' to gain power over all ethnical groups. History show they have done this before (in Babylon and in the Roman empire, Germany was the opposite, monoculturalism, one ethnical group, germans) They do the same for thousands of years, and every time they succeed (ruling over masses of people, have their empire)
