"Pro-lifers" claim Planned Parenthood & doctors are "in it for the money" on abortion

The only disconnect I'm seeing here is your inability to understand that there is a difference between working for a non-profit at $12 an hour and $400,000.00 a year. The hourly pay is much less profitable that the huge salary.

 

What is the difference between a for profit business owner who earns $400,000.00 salary per year and
an executive who works for a non-profit business who earns $400,000.00 salary per year?

Hint:

$400,000
-$400,000
=0

There is zero difference.

 

Wow! $400,000.00 !!!

GOOD!

I am so glad they're getting that much! They do a wonderful service and it's a great incentive to ignore the extremist droolers and keep on with the GOOD WORK!

 

Great. Democrats can get on with the job of aborting more black babies than are born in the City of New York.

So much for the idea "black lives matter".

 

Yes, DEMOCRATS will get on with the business of preserving women's rights, even black women's rights that Anti-Choice/Anti-Abortionist want to take away. Righties want to LIMIT BLACK WOMEN'S RIGHTS to meet some magical number so it doesn't go past another number....black women's lives do NOT matter to Anti-Choicer/Anti-Abortion righties....


Yes, black lives matter, too! Black women have as much right to have an abortion as any other color woman, their lives matter!!!!

 

That is one way to do away with the black race.

 

What is? Giving them equal rights? My, what a silly idea..... Please do tell black people that equal rights will do away with them.....most ridiculous argument against equal rights EVER!

 

Exterminating them. That's what'll do away with them. One abortion at a time. Ever notice when democrats talk about changing the demographics of America, it's always about adding brown people, not black people?

 

Nope, the only disconnect here is your inability to understand that wages regardless of the rate are not profit and have nothing to do with profit of an organization and are in fact an expenditure.

 

The difference is that NEITHER have anything to do with the profit of the organization, both are monies paid in return for services given and BOTH are, in fact, expenditure to the organization, where the difference comes is that the for-profit organization can distribute any monies in excess of expenditure to it's members a non-profit organization can not.


your attempt to equate salary to an organizations profit is absurd and 100% incorrect.

 

I disagree.

 

If Planned Parenthood were truly non-profit their executives would be paid $0 for their volunteer work.

 

fine, it is your right to disagree with all the proof that shows you are wrong .. just as it is the right of all those flat earth believers to believe the earth is flat despite the evidence to the contrary.

 

It seems you have little idea as to what non-profit means or is.

If the church were truly non-profit their clergy would be be paid $0 for their volunteer work, after all the church is also a non-profit organization receiving federal funding, same goes for crisis pregnancy centres, in fact ALL non-profit organizations who pay salaries and receive state funding should do the same if they are truly non-profit .. well that is according to your logic.

 

I don't think any group should get federal funding that doesn't belong to them. The money belongs to the taxpayers.

 

Nope it does not, once money has been taken via taxation that money belongs to the government, and even IF it did belong to the taxpayer there are taxpayers who are more than happy to fund PP, only 40% of Americans would support a law prohibiting health clinics that provide abortions from receiving any federal funds, so you are in the minority.

 

Okay then fine. Let's have a special tax on the 60% of people who feel that way.

 

And neither you nor anyone else has ever proven that black women were forced to get abortions by anyone...

 

I don't believe you.

Then don't respond.

 

This is one of the only truthful facts I first hand knowledge of. Most OBGyn's are not going to perform an abortion unless the Mother's like is endangered. They will 99% of the time tell the patient to go to a clinic that will perform the abortion. This happened to me. I ended up in the Hospital when the clinics Surgeon screwed it up. And then, my OB operated on me and completed the abortion. My embryo wasn't even 1 month old and that contributed to the botch up of the clinic physician who thought he perforated my uterus.

I can say these Clinic Doctors are in it for the money but they clearly don't value the life of a fetus as OBs do.

 

Or maybe clinic doctors just value the life of the woman more:

 

Of course the clinic doctors valued your life over the fetus, that's why they do abortions.......the OBGyn doctors valued the fetus's life over yours when they refused to do an abortion.!

 

Margaret Sanger is still popular among racists and eugenicist
Yes, and that's why they, the Anti-Choice/Anti-Women's Rights people, bring her up in abortion debates even though she has no relevance today. She's very popular with them, you are correct.

 

Woodrow Wilson, the father of Progressivism, is also very popular among the same racists.

The anti-choice people bring up Margaret Sanger because she was the mother of Planned Parenthood and the pro-choice movement. They use her racism and eugenicism as a weapon against the people you support in order to expose the racism of Progressives.

Margaret Sanger and Woodrow Wilson are very popular among modern Progressives. Progressivism is a vehicle of modern day racism designed to disempower African Americans and keep them down.

 

How could Margaret Sanger be the mother of the pro-choice movement when she herself was anti-choice?

How many black Republican congressmen, and how many black Democratic congressmen are there?