Putin: if NATO ships do not leave the Black Sea within three days, they will be at the bottom!

CHINA CALLED THE CIVIL WAR IN SYRIA WITH DEATH BATTLE BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND NATO: THE EXERCISE IS CLOSER
14/06/2018 - 08:54
The Chinese edition of Jinji touchiao called the civil war in Syria a deadly battle between Russia and the NATO countries.
The war in Syria has been going on for seven years now. From the outside, it may seem like a civil war between Syrian government forces and opposition fighters, but in reality it is a deadly battle between Russia and the NATO countries.
Now the situation is becoming more and more heated. Syria is called the "heart of the Middle East" because of its unique physico-geographical and military-strategic position. The country is located at the intersection of five seas (the Persian Gulf, the Mediterranean, the Caspian, the Red and Black Seas). That is why Russia in order to keep Syria in its field of influence has placed its military base in this geopolitically significant region. Otherwise, the territory of Syria would be occupied in a single moment by the forces of other states or anti-government insurgents, and various extremist groups would rush to the south of Russia, posing a serious threat to the national security of the country.
Taking into account these considerations, since September 2014 Russia has been supporting the Syrian government forces with all its might and is spending billions of dollars on measures to implement it. In addition to the supply of weapons and dispatch of military specialists, Russia also sends troops to Syria, including the Air Force and special forces, who are fighting shoulder to shoulder with the Syrian army. The "militant nation" has a real power: from the moment the Russians entered the war, the situation took a favorable turn for the Syrian government troops, and the Syrian rebels suffered significant losses.
Russia's victory in Syria led the Americans to "loss of face." The US could not sit idly by and had to come into play personally. Not so long ago, the US armed forces, taking with them the British and French, again attacked Syria. In addition, the nuclear-powered USS Harry Truman aircraft recently entered the Mediterranean waters. It would seem that the purpose of this maneuver is to conduct a new air attack. However, in fact, the main goal is to block the road to Syria through the Black Sea (since Russia does not have a common land border with Syria, all military assistance is mainly carried out across the sea).
According to media reports, recently a whole group of NATO warships entered the Black Sea. The ships of the North Atlantic Alliance conducted large-scale military exercises. The purpose of this maneuver is obvious: they want to pressure Russia. Russia has long considered the Black Sea as its "inner sea". Such actions by NATO undoubtedly threaten the national security of the Russian Federation and provoke the Russian side to respond.
Putin took a tough stance and demanded that all NATO warships leave the Black Sea for three days, otherwise Russia will have to resort to harsh measures. At the same time, the Russian Armed Forces also did not stand aside and conducted large-scale military exercises in the Black Sea. According to reliable sources, NATO warships are under the sights of Russian missiles deployed in the Crimea, and the Russian Navy and the Air Force have already been brought to an advanced level of readiness.
Will NATO countries listen to Putin's words and dutifully withdraw their ships from the Black Sea water area or not? Time will tell.
http://mil.eastday.com/a/180608105953748-3.html

 

lol, 3 days? Dream on comrade

 

So, China called or some Chinese edition of Jinji touchiao? Or there is no difference between these two?

 

LOL, how come? You didnt even conquered the basin If that was ever a legit reason.

You Russians are both stupid and dangerous.

 

"They will be at the bottom"?....really? I thought he wanted a successful World Cup soccer, not a good way to start it, by starting WW3!?!

 

Putin: if NATO ships do not leave the Black Sea within three days, they will be at the bottom!

Vlad, don't make threats you won't back up.

 

I don't believe for a nanosecond that Putin is reckless and stupid; just the opposite, one of the smartest men alive.

 

More likely fake news. If that was the case, western MSM would burst with articles.

 

If putin attacks NATO ships, democrats will blame Trump.

 

That there was collusion to do this during the 2016 campaign.

 

Very serious situation! Russia does not make idle threats. Those Nato ships have no right to be in the Black Sea. There is a Treaty governing the entrance and exit of foreign ships. But then again, Washington has become a law unto itself.

This is scary because the World Cup is on in Russia, and Washington has a habit of starting wars or overthrowing governments during games. I guess because the games are meant to uphold peace, and that is after all the antithesis of what we stand for.

Seems like Nato wants to be prepared in the Black Sea and Mediterranean for the false flags attacks which are ready to unfold in Ukraine and Syria.

China's right, it is a war between Nato and Russia.

 

Yeah this has always been a proxy war. I feel horrible for the poor citizens in the middle.

 

I'm not understanding who you have beef with? NATO? Russia? The U.S.

Serious question not flaming.

 

If Putin controls Trump then why are we taking a part in threatening him?

Must not be very good control.

 

I just noticed that Russia's warning did not say leave in three days. It said leave for three days. There is a law governing the length of time guest ships are allowed to remain in the Black Sea, and Russia is determined that the law should be followed. Also I didn't read anything about the ships ending up at the bottom of the sea. If anything, Russia will do what it did to the SS Donald Cooke and block their aegis system - all legal of course.

 

Russia must think the Black Sea is a Russian sea.

 

Maybe they will annex it and at the next G-7 summit Trump will petition that Russia be let back in!

 

My beef is the criminality of my government with its lies and hypocrisy.

 

Syria has been in the Russian sphere for over half a century and is Russia's only foreign base, we have bases in over half the countries in the world. We should not involve in Syria and should get our ships out of the Black Sea.

 

Just like the Chinese think there's a 'South Chinese Sea'. Logistically, it's difficult because one doesn't want to get into a naval war with powers such as China/Russia, but one also wants to promote as Mattis said: Free and open space in INTL waters. Though I find myself conflicted since we could and once did embark on the same principle(Monroe Doctrine) to protect American sea-space. I still believe in the Monroe Doctrine and it'd be center to my foreign policy.

 

But your government isn't Putin's mob government.

 

You seem to have a comprehension problem. There is a treaty known as the Montreux Convention, which specifies what ships can enter the Black Sea and how long they are allowed to stay there. Be careful because when you overthrow existing laws without due process, it will always bite the ones who did it in the end. Never fails!

 

Tell me about it...………….

 

I hear what you are saying and I understand Russia's motive, but going soft on Russia will only result in getting bent over and raped, no lube.

 

You can always tell criminals by their labeling and usage of derogatory terms to cover up their crimes.