Rape Charges against Trump moving forward!

Why do you believe that negates what trump did?

 

Keep on thinking that. It will help you in your fantasy world.

Here is a pic of how things in your world work. Enjoy them while they last

 

You do live in a fantasy of your own. Enjoy it

 

You don't use your common sense, do you?

 

Why do you believe that negates what Biden did? And I'll let you have a choice of which Biden... Joe OR Hunter...

 

I don't believe it does. Why do you believe that negates what trump did?

 

So you want to stick your nose in others conversation?
Why don't you show anything you think was inappropriate about this photo, in a conversation that you were not part of...Why do you believe that negates what trump did not do? This court of public opinion bull is getting old...

 

Why do you believe that negates what trump did?

 

Golly, the woman is sort of blond, there, he's guilty. is that you theory here?

 

See my last response to you, specifically in regards to intellectual dishonesty. Therein lies your answer.

 

Please tell us what Trump "did"...

 

My question was not about intellectual dishonesty. It was about whether or not you acknowledged that she has quite a bit of "skin in the game": Regardless of attorney fees or similar financial aspects, does she or does she not have "skin in the game"? And it's twice now you have refrained from answering. That can only mean that my first instinct (which is that your claim that she doesn't covered more than just the financial aspect) was correct.

 

I.D. is the very fiber of your being. It is nearly impossible to take you seriously. If there is a moment where you are not gaslighting, that simply means you are not on political chat at that moment.

I do not level this accusation regularly to anyone else. Just you. You are nothing, if not consistent. It is sort of funny, but not in a laugh-with-you kind of way.

 

Did you read the OP?

 

This thread is not about me. It's about Trump's rape victim. I asked a question to clarify your position because you accused me of taking it out of context. The answer to my question would make it clear once and for all whether I had or hadn't taken it out of context. Since this is the third time you refuse to answer, the only possible conclusion is that my interpretation did NOT take it out of context and what I said about your position WAS in fact an accurate response to your statement.

 

My reply is about you.

I do not take you or your gaslighting seriously. It is silly, and not worthy of a substantive reply.

 

Evidently you have been living in your own fantasy world and have not seen any TV, read any newspapers, or even listened to your own friends and neighbors. If that is the case, no one can make you see anything.

 

First of all, in his entire life, I don't think any woman is not his type. As long as she is female and young, he is all interest. I don't think his prick is choosy. That is my opinion. I mean, do you think that his wife Ivana was pretty? I certainly don't.

 

yea.... I need some help.... show me what Trump "did"... please provide credible sources.

 

E. Jean Carroll's attorney's have asked for Trump's DNA. She did keep the skirt she was using then the alleged rape occurred. She never washed it so if the DNA matches, it is Trump's ass that will suffer

https://twitter.com/MichaelArt123/s...^1582827311954812929|twgr^|twcon^s1_&ref_url=

 

Let start with the 7 Jan 6th hearings where all witnesses were people that worked for Trump and who clearly stated that Trump not only supported the insurrection but actually was involved in what happened. You can find each and every one of those broadcasts on you tube.

Then lets go with the raid on Trump's Mar-a-Lago home where they found 92 cases of classified documents that he has no right to have and lied about having them. That too can be found on Google and You Tube and all from credible sources.

Then let us go to all the Trump loyalists that he fired or that left him when he was president.

Then lets see his competence while in office in choosing people to be part of his team. He has a "record' for the most firings or leaving him of all presidents.

Then to finish it off, Lets talk about the fact that 23 months since the election and in spite of over 60 judgements from judges (most of them chosen by him), there has not been a shred of evidence that the election was stolen. Yet he refuses to acknowledge it even though all the people that worked for him, or still are on his side, have stated that the election was not stolen.

You want me to continue? Do you have the interest or the time to check all of this out. Or are you simply



and data, fact, and truths do not matter.

 

Jfyi, ironically, those who use the above photo of dad and daughter are the ones with the dirty minds.
Shame on them.

 

Civil case and a stupendously stupid one at that,

 

Trump has been charged with no criime.
It’s a civil trial and Trump will not be lawfully required to submit DNA because he is protected by fourth amendment rights.

 

Like Jean Carroll, some are tossing the usual partisan codswallop at the wall, hoping it sticks.