Rashida Tlaib’s Expletive-Laden Cry to Impeach Trump Upends Democrats’ Talking Points

Yep, just watch the infestation of islam change the US of A.....dontcha just luv rapid cultural change....

 

Hah, seems like a rational prediction based on a deep knowledge of American demographics.

 

Of course you support the low road.

 

The US president was sworn in on the bible, which implies allegiance to God and not his country.

The bible dictates that too. So she fits right in.


Overall.... judging a woman only based on her religion. lol
How far right and intolerant the west has become.
It won't be long before we're marching against the nazi's again.

 

No it hasn't. When immigrants came in the past, they assimilated. It has only been recently that immigrants have been encouraged to retain their cultural traditions all the while trashing our culture.

 

OMG. Here we go. We're all "Nazis' if we don't think like you. How predictable. By the way, its been a long, long time since a Christian beheaded someone for being gay, or belonging to another religion.

 

I judge her cause she's ugly, has a foul mouth, and because I know that she would love to see Sharia Law in the US. Is it ok if I verbalize the fact that she is ugly isn't it? I mean if she can stand in crowd of people and call Trump a mf, then I should be able to call her ugly?

 

Really? The West hasn't been quick to break down barriers of tradition for something like 600 years?

It's been one of our hallmarks.

First, who said anything about immigrants?

Second, no they haven't. I can trace my outlook and cultural heritage back to the Scots-Irish settlers who were nothing like northern puritans or southern slave lords.

The United States has never had a single culture to assimilate to.

No, it hasn't. From the settling of Massachusetts Bay on the United States has been culturally divided and even culturally warring.

 

My grandparents came from Ireland. I assure you they assimilated.

 

Sure, they assimilated to something. But it wasn't "American culture." It was a regional culture, originally founded by a wave of immigrants who didn't assimilate to any of the American cultures alreadyin place.

 

Historians say America was founded on Judo-Christian principles.

The U.S. Constitution is heavily based upon "Law of Nature" and somewhat on English Common Law.

But one is not required to take the oath of office on the Holy Bible but most people do.

Now it was reported, don't know if it was your usual MSM fake news or not that Rashida Tlaib took the oath of office using Thomas Jefferson's Koran.

Here are the facts.

Thomas Jefferson did acquire a copy of the Koran and read it.

Why would he do that ???

Know your enemy.

America's first war approved by Congress was against Muslims.

It's why the United States has a navy and Marine Corps today because they were established by Congress to fight America's first war, the Barbary Pirates War.

The Barbary pirates were Muslims who would capture American merchant ships and enslave American citizens (sailors) or hold them for ransom which is condoned in the Koran.

In 1805 President Jefferson sent U.S. Marines "to the shores of Tripoli."

In 2019 President Trump should send U.S. Marines to the front porch of Rashida Tlaib home.

Islam was America's first enemy as a young nation and continues today being America's enemy.

 

Complete and utter nonsense. We had a flash-in-the-pan run in with some North African pirates. Jefferson had a Qur'an long before we were even independent.

 

Your source is ?

 

Perhaps before long we will have democrats sworn in on the the Communist Manifesto or Das Capital?

 

It's well-knowm that he purchased it as a law student in the 60s.

 

The Jefferson Qur'an...-> http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/Public/focus/essay1009_jefferson.html

One of six excerpts:

The Barbary Wars
In 1786, while Jefferson was serving as the United States Ambassador to France, the issue of piracy in the Mediterranean became the most serious economic threat to the newly established United States. Independence from Great Britain had had economic consequences abroad. This was before international law had established protections for territorial waters, so if a ship sailed into range from a country with which the local government had no treaty, it was generally assumed to be hostile and therefore subject to attack. While America was still a group of colonies of the British Crown, its ships were protected because the Crown had such a treaty and paid an annual tribute to the government in Tripoli to protect its interests. But with the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. lost the protection of both the royal coffers and the royal navy, making travel and trade a precarious endeavor around the coast of the Maghreb. Pirates from the modern-day states of Algeria, Libya, and Tunisia attacked American merchant ships trading in the region with abandon.

Jefferson, together with his contemporary, John Adams, who was then serving as the Ambassador to England, met with the Ambassador from Tripoli, Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, in an attempt to understand why American ships were being attacked and Americans being taken hostage. In a report to the then Secretary of State John Jay, Jefferson cites the Ambassador as saying:

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.xv
Scholars recognize the ambassador's paraphrasing of the "Sword Verse" (Surah 9:5), as the Qur'anic passage sometimes used to justify jihad is popularly known. The document is an excellent summation of the pirate's motivations. It may also be read as an eerie foreshadowing of the rationale claimed by some terrorists today. But Jefferson's understanding of the Qur'an resulted in a very different outcome from today's Global War on Terror. The 1796 Treaty of Tripoli was Congress's response to the pirating of American ships in the Mediterranean. Drafted by Jefferson's friend and colleague, Joel Barlow, the treaty stated emphatically that "the government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility of Musselmen."xvi

Nearly two hundred years before the State Department found it necessary to delve into the Qur'an, Jefferson had already done so to great effect. Jefferson again engaged with the Barbary Pirates as President between 1801 and 1805, during the first of what would become known as the Barbary Wars. Politically, this would be one of his last diplomatic engagements with Islam where he utilized his knowledge of the Qur'an for the benefit of the United States. At the conclusion of the first Barbary War, with the United States procuring its first victory on foreign shores, a temporary peace was reached and Jefferson extended an invitation to the Tunisian Ambassador in Washington to attend dinner at the White House. The invitation happened to fall in the month of Ramadan, and so dinner was rescheduled and became the White House's first iftar. This iftar that marked the conclusion of 1805 and the treaty with at least one of the Barbary States was a symbolic conclusion to Jefferson's documented and known use of the Qur'an and his knowledge of Islam. Surely both Jefferson and his guest could appreciate the breaking of the Ramadan fast, a reward of nourishment after a day of reflection and struggle for personal betterment.

 

Like it.

 

@APACHERAT

From your quote:

Doesn't seem like early Americans share your belief that Islam was our first enemy... or even an enemy at all.

 

Using a religious book, that is also used to justify LYING to the non muslims, in order to carry forth the islamic agenda, just seems to be the wrong book to be sworn in on. Know what I mean?

The religious law against bearing false witness, doesn't seem to be contained in the Koran. All is fair in love and islam?

 

I have never read the Quran but I understand that it says, in so many words, that it is ok for Muslims to do anything--even break Islamic rules--if it furthers the cause of a world-wide caliphate. Sneaky little devils. I would prefer they conn old women out of the pension checks like the televangelists do. Least you know where they are coming from.

 

I have only read quotes from that book, that are used as evidence to indict this religion.

Do I think that all muslims do this? No. But if their books allow it, even promote it, well, that is enough for me.

The question is of course, just how seriously do muslims follow their religious books? And is there some great debate going on within islam today, to fashion it into something similar as we saw happen within christianity, long ago? Something that ended the practices, immoral acts, of the RCC, that has quite the recorded history of acting similar to what we see coming from islamic nations, like we see in the middle east. With saudi arabia being one of them?

It was once said that christianity was the world's most dangerous religion. They reformed, over time, and yet we have not seen such a reformation within islam, nor is there on on the horizon. And unless islam is reformed, with the radical, evil promoting, branches removed, this religion can never conform itself into decency, and be capable of existing in an increasing secular world, without the violence and murder that islam has become so well known for in more recent history.

Isn't it primarily this middle eastern sunni contingent, which outnumber the shia that is the problem? I don't recall the shia sect as being known for terrorism, against the West. We can see which sect is the problem, and it happens to be the sect we side with against the shia.

 

There are over a billion muslims. If they all want to kill you then you would be dead

 

It's not my idea what to think about the "undesirables".

 

You're judging her on her being a muslim, and than make up she would love to see Sharia law in the US.
You're just as racist as a person judging a somebody for being Jewish.

 

No, she called the president *********ker and this is what she’s being judged for. Had not she done that, her being moslem women and even erasing Israel from the map would not bring all that much attention or being scrutinized. Later on, perhaps; not on the very first day.

She’s a bigot, a racist and foul mouthed hater, and not a good person who should resign mmediately and apologie to her voters and to her family.