Re: Nist - nc star 1a

Discussion in '9/11' started by genericBob, Sep 4, 2014.

  1. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    From page 45 of NIST NCSTAR 1A

    Notice that the NIST uses the term "negligible support" in reference to steel structure that if it had supplied ANY support at all, would have prevented the falling bit from ever reaching free fall acceleration.

    The NIST either demonstrates gross incompetence or intent to commit fraud. Pick one.....

    Anybody who can manage to pull a "C" grade from a SCIENCE 101 class can get this. Why are people on the public payroll allowed to get away with this sort of thing?
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So it was 'gravitational acceleration' NOT free fall acceleration,eh?
     
  3. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What I quoted said FREE FALL, can you not read?
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What I read was part of the north face fell at that speed,NOT the whole structure
     
  5. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Correction, speed is NOT acceleration and even if you say that the North & West walls fell as simply a shell, the fact of free fall, clearly indicates that there was NO resistance at all under the falling bit, it has yet to be adequately explained as to just exactly how you get all of the support removed and all at the same time.
     
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I said nothing of the west face,and i posted SPEED,and meant it as such.

    And all the support from the FACE of a building?....Are you kidding?
     
  7. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you understand the difference between speed & acceleration?
    also note that the North & West walls are visible descending together as a unit, and no matter how thin you think that bit was, the fact is that the bit that is observed in motion, was a physical object that obeys the laws of physics. No resistance under the falling mass, means exactly that no resistance and to have ALL of the resistance removed for 8 floors and all at the same time, just exactly what magic produces that result?
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I understand the difference quite well,I said 'speed' because the mind can make the connection faster than with 'velocity'
     
  9. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,395
    Likes Received:
    249
    Trophy Points:
    83
    After watching this...

    9/11: NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel (extended)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SLIzSCt_cg

    ...and looking at this info,...

    September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
    (2:40:21 time mark)

    ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 911 TRUTH (full unreleased version)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo

    ...I'd say fraud.
     
  10. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You use the terms "speed" & "velocity" however do you understand that ACCELERATION is different from speed or velocity in that it describes a constantly increasing speed?
     
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Regarding the bold: Um, no it doesn't. Check your facts.
     
  12. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, please enlighten me as to what is wrong with what I posted(?)
     
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Acceleration, in physics, is the rate at which the velocity of an object changes over time.
     
  14. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    boils down to a semantics argument
    thank U very much.
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wrong. It boils down to an understanding of physics.
     
  16. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bottom line here, do you get it that WTC7 descended at a rate indistinguishable from the acceleration of gravity for 2.25 sec?

    You have repeatedly attempted to negate a scientific reality that has been agreed upon by both the NIST and the "truther" community. so in the face of experts who agree upon what is stated, what reason do you give in your disagreement?
     
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, it didn't. You have been shown why your statement above is false and yet you keep re-posting it.

    Why can't truthers just tell the truth?
     
  18. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    to see the total madness of this whole thing
    I invite the casual reader to look up the NIST report
    ( NIST NC STAR 1A ) and see for yourself, and also
    the material on WTC.net and http://911speakout.org/
    etc...... The fall, rate of fall, and the fact that the building
    or at least the part of it that is visible ( the North & West walls)
    keeps its shape during that 2.25 sec.
     

Share This Page