Again: You just produced long-dead canards and memes that have long been disproved. I'm not misrepresenting anything, so keep your moronic accusations to yourself.
First you say this above.Then follow it with the following quote. So you are declaring things that I posted as NOT being lies then go on to say that you haven''t even SEEN the quotes? What gives Scott? It does huh? Is that maybe because the truthers took out the part where the east penthouse collapses into the building 6 to 7 seconds PRIOR to the scene in the video above? Try looking at a video of the ENTIRE collapse linked below. Then explain why truthers seem to want to leave the penthouse part out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc You're missing the point. All truthers who believe in demolition for WTC7 says that ALL the explosives went of SIMULTANEOUSLY to create ZERO RESISTANCE below. I am asking you a simple question. If, as you say above, explosives were detonated at the top to remove support, why didn't free fall commence IMMEDIATELY upon those detonations? Why are there data points of less than free fall in Chandler's chart? What caused those Scott?
Like I said, I took it as tongue in cheek. So you honestly think that that anyone would believe that a truther site actually said that? When I first read it, that's exactly what I thought. So again, if you think there is something malicious behind that post, you need to take it up with them. I don't think there was for the reason I just gave.
Let me help you with finding their quotes. Excerpts from some of their brochures: Hmmm... ALMOST symmetrical? Kind of changes the meaning of just plain "symmetrical" now doesn't it. What about the "completely broken up in 6.5 seconds" garbage? In the video I posted above that shows the east penthouse, how long to you get for the COMPLETE collapse. Misleading huh?
