Read: Trump letter to Pelosi on impeachment

No I don't. It was a strictly partisan party line vote. And you lost three Democrats.

 

The truth seems to function as the political Left's Kryptonite as they have a massive allergic reaction to it; and especially when delivered by way of Trump. The funny thing is that they honestly seem to believe that the rest of the nation has not recognized this blatant trait in regards to them.

 

Trump has mis-spoken plenty, but it has never been sinister or underhanded, or amounted to anything, because it isn't really lying anyway. It's a bad habit, and that's about it. Liberals like to jump all over it because it's all they got versus, say, the Clintons' shockingly deplorable, demonic lies that should have landed them in prison a long time ago.

 

That sounds like just more speculation, on top of all the other previous speculations from your side.

No one, not even Trump cannot win in an environment where your enemies lack any factual evidence to support your guilt of their speculations about your inner most thoughts, motivations or intentions, but yet convict you of secretly trying to act upon these presumptions they hold of you.

No matter that Trump (the defendant) and Zenlensky (the victim) have stated that nothing like you accuse them of ever took place, and regardless of the fact that you still lack any evidence to support your charges. In other words nothing they can ever do will prove their innocence; how convenient. This is not justice, this is a lynch mob mentality, where you pronounced a person guilty as accused, unless they can disprove your belief in their guilt.

 

You are so wrong. This will go down in our history books as much worse, more lacking in factual evidence, and more politically partisan than the impeachment of Andrew Johnson

 

Record setting as a hyper partisan impeachment that is so bad that the dem clown show didn't include the investigation charges in the articles but instead included one opinion and the second because they were in such a hurry and could not follow process. Now the joke is on them as they contemplate not sending the article to the Senate. Hard to prosecute an impeachment with zero evidence.

 

Yep, and I just read two authoritative sources that insist that until the Senate receives the actual impeachment article in a formal process legally speaking no impeachment has occurred.

 

Just read the same and one came from one of the democrats professor witnesses.

 

Correct. Legally speaking, until Pelosi sends it to the Senate it is just meaningless political theater that means nothing.

 

Wrong!

The House PASSING Articles of Impeachment HAS occurred which is the definition of impeachment.

The Senate trial to REMOVE your IBLOTUS for those CRIMES is still pending.

 

Let’s both check back in 80 years. Put a pin in this one?

 

Keep telling yourself that, but until something like a warrant or indictment is actually served it is just a meaningless piece of paper; and Nancy is currently afraid to serve her paper. Thus . . . officially there has been no impeachment of Trump.

 

The House will move the articles of impeachment to the Senate by late January, early February. Trump is impeached. Nancy holding out to see what the process will be does not change that. Y’all are so excited over this one.

 

Thus she proves to the entire nation that the political Left's SHRIEKS of a 'dire national emergency' was just leftist game play. Sweet!

It is going to be so much fun watching voters at the end of 2020 punish the collective and ever increasingly radical Dem Party leadership for these scum-bucket level stunts. People get angry when either party uses the INTENT of the Constitution as their personal . . . dildo.

 

Addressing the presidents actions was indeed a dire emergency, but rushing through the process won’t undo anything. Nancy is within her right to tailor the process to her liking.
Something something Trumpette heads exploding.

 

You should take your own advice.

The entire world now considers your IBLOTUS to be impeached.

Denialism is not going to alter that FACT.

 

No need to, we already know how history will look back on this.

The dems in the house had three witnesses to the Republican's one witness.

The dems had given themselves veto power over the witnesses, denying witnesses that the Republicans tried to call.

The dems even halted Republicans from asking questions of witnesses, and at times told witnesses not to answer questions by Republicans.

During inquiry hearings, the dems refused to recognize Republicans for parliamentary inquires or points of order.

The votes on impeachment were completely one sided, with not one Republican every voting with the majority. The only bipartisanship was observed with the few Democrats who voted with the Republicans.

The Democrat controlled House had NO FACTUAL EVIDENCE to support their articles of impeachment nor any of their assumptions they made of Trump. They had no evidence to support what they presumed to know of Trump's inner most thoughts, intentions or motivations.

We do not need to wait eighty years before we comprehend that opinion and conjecture are not evidence.